Trumps pick for HHS secretary was a good move as he will bring some common sense and logic to the problem of progressive criminal activity to this troubled government department that's tasked to help the disadvantaged.
The problem is, disadvantaged people are at risk of becoming even more disadvantaged when they put the faith in a program that is trotted out as serving those that need it the most. That's where the problem begins.
The reality with the progressive democrats is that it's the democrats see themselves as the needy, they need more power and money, and therefore use the disadvantaged as tools to be used and abused to further the 'needs' of democrat elected and unelected officials. Driving states and local communities to do the bidding of bureaucrats from Washington only brings more problems and therefore chaos and conflict trying to administer programs.
Democrat campaign coffers are always in need of more money and what better way to get then making sure the voters have no choice but to vote for them to continue the money flowing into programs and local officials greasing the ways for the money going out to selected state and federal officials. It's worked this way for decades, and not only in HHS.
Little wonder the progressives liberal democrats are boycotting the inauguration, 68 so far. They see their easy money grave train coming into the station and it the end of the line for them.
HHS Pick Tom Price Pledges to Meet ‘Needs of All’ After Obamacare Repeal
Melissa Quinn / @MelissaQuinn97 /
Rep. Tom Price, who is President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, countered Democrats’ claims about the consequences of repealing Obamacare, telling senators that “nobody’s interested in pulling the rug out from under anybody.”
|Democrats puzzled on common sense answers - What's that?|
As secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, Price would be responsible for overseeing repeal of the health care law and implementing its replacement—a plan congressional Republicans have yet to unveil. Congress took a crucial step toward repealing Obamacare last week, but Democrats and some Republicans raised concerns about the repeal process, especially regarding Americans who gained health coverage under the law.
Watch the video : Reconciliation - https://youtu.be/AewM8I8_19s
Price, a former chairman of the House Budget Committee, signaled to committee Chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., that the law would be repealed piece by piece, but stressed he didn’t want to pull “the rug out from under anybody.” “I think there’s been a lot of talk about individuals losing health coverage,” Price told the committee. “That is not our goal, nor is it our desire nor is it our plan.”
Among concerns expressed by Senate Democrats was whether Americans with pre-existing conditions would be able to purchase coverage once Obamacare is repealed. Price offered few details on the replacement plan the Trump administration will put forth. But his own proposal requires insurers to provide coverage to consumers with pre-existing conditions if the individual has had coverage for at least 18 months. Price’s proposal also calls for creation of high-risk pools, designed to help those with pre-existing conditions find affordable insurance. The Georgia Republican reiterated his support for that before the Senate panel.
Trump, in an interview published Sunday, told The Washington Post his replacement plan would provide “insurance for everybody.” The president-elect walked back his comment, however, in an interview Tuesday with Axios. When asked about Trump’s comments, Price said he shared the president-elect’s goal of providing “insurance for everybody,” but focused specifically on expanding access. “What I’m committed to is making sure every single American has access to coverage they want and making sure Americans can purchase that coverage,” he said.
Price also fielded questions from Democrats about his stock trades involving health care companies over the past four years. Senate Democrats, some of whom also own health care stock, alleged that Price unethically traded certain stocks. Price maintained that he had no knowledge of the stocks purchased, since a broker manages his investment portfolio.