Saturday, July 22, 2017

Democrats Create Reality : Russians Control The World?

It's really all about what is reality and what is the truth. Never mix the two as it become very confusing to the average person, so look away from the truth and live in reality. It's really all about the Washington 'two step' that politicians use to create an alternate reality.

'Russia is here and running the show'. Democrats and their friends in the media know how the system works. Democrats want us to believe America has become a Russian gulag run by Trump and his family. But in the new reality, the democrats are Russians right hand useful idiots to make it work as a reality.

It's called the Washington 'two step' - look over there while we steal you blind.

Progressive Left Agenda Threatens America : Democrats Abanden Restraint

'There is nothing new under the sun'. Socialism has always believed personal freedom to chose was at fault for all human suffering, even though socialist societies have tortured and murdered millions in the name of advancing their socialist ideology

Russia, China, Cuba and many Latin American countries that have implemented strict socialist agendas have failed dramatically. How about Venezuelan and what has transpired there. 

On the other hand where every people are free to chose their own destinies they thrive and prosper. Little wonder people are flocking to America, land of the free and home of the brave. I wonder as well why hordes of refugees are not headed to Cuba? Russia or China for that matter.

The Left Is a Greater Threat to America Than Putin
Dennis Prager / /  

Last week, I tweeted, “The news media in the West pose a far greater danger to Western civilization than Russia does.” To my surprise, the tweet went viral. And while there were more likes than dislikes, 99 percent of the written reactions were negative.


Typical reactions were: –“F— you.” –“Move to Russia.” –“Your very full diapers pose a very great danger, please change them.” That received 1,880 likes. –“I’ve wiped s— off my shoes more trustworthy and patriotic than your sorry a–.” That received 606 likes. You get the idea.

But it wasn’t the ad hominem insults that I found troubling. What was troubling was the low state of logical thinking that so many responses reflected. This was exemplified by their reminding me how important a free press is to democracy (as if attacking the behavior of the media were the same as denying the need for a free press); their asking how many nukes the media have compared with Russia (as if a threat to lives were the same as a threat to a civilization); and their thinking that my tweet was about President Donald Trump (he was never mentioned, and the words were just as true when Barack Obama was president).

My tweet was about the Western left undoing Western civilization. My one regret is that I did not mention universities along with the media. The tweet had nothing to do with the existence of a free press. Attacking what the media is doing is not the same as attacking the existence of the media—any more than attacking Trump is attacking the existence of the presidency.

With regard to Russia having more nukes than the media, those who noted this fact so missed the entire point of the tweet that it is almost breathtaking. When one speaks about dangers to a civilization, one is speaking ideologically, not physically. Of course, if Russia were to unleash its nuclear weapons against the West, it would kill vast numbers of Westerners. However, that would no more mean the end of Western civilization than the Holocaust meant the end of Jewish civilization. Civilization connotes a body of ideas and a value system.

Furthermore, a Russian nuclear attack threatening the West’s physical existence is an utterly remote possibility. Russian leaders, just as Soviet leaders before them, fear what is known as MAD (mutually assured destruction).

The real nuclear threat comes from North Korea and, above all, Iran, which constantly announces its intent to exterminate Israel. But while The New York Times cannot stop writing about the threat Russian President Vladimir Putin poses, it accuses Trump of “demonizing” Iran.

The real threat to Western civilization is Western civilization ceasing to believe in itself. And, in that regard, Russia poses no danger, while the left-wing-dominated media and universities pose an existential threat. That’s why the most depressing of the negative reactions were those from people calling themselves conservatives. If conservatism isn’t about conserving Western civilization first and foremost, what is it about?

Students in college have voted the American flag off their campus. Where did these students learn their unprecedented contempt for America and patriotism, if not from their schools and the media?
European countries continue to welcome in millions of Muslims, adding to the tens of millions of Muslims already in Europe—many of whom, if not most, have no interest in adopting Europe’s values.

Do the critics of my tweet conclude nothing about the left’s role—meaning the role of Western media and academia—in promoting multiculturalism, the doctrine that holds that no cultural, religious, or value system is superior to any other? At the University of Pennsylvania, its left-wing English department has removed its long-standing portrait of Shakespeare because he was white and male. Is that not a direct hit on Western civilization?

The left-wing prime minister of Canada has proudly announced, “There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada,” and that Canada is “the first postnational state.” What produced him? Putin?
Is it Putin who is removing American flags from American campuses? Is Putin destroying the notion of male and female?

Has Putin convinced half of America’s millennials that socialism is preferable to capitalism?
Did Putin convince Pope Francis that Islamic terrorists are no more of a threat to Europe than baptized Catholics who kill their girlfriends? Is Putin the reason Oxford University students voted that Israel is a greater threat to peace than Hamas?

Putin is indeed a murderous quasi dictator. But all this contempt for Western civilization comes from the Western media and the Western universities.

The smoking gun was provided just two weeks ago in the media’s reactions to Trump’s speech in Warsaw, Poland, in which he called for protecting Western civilization.

Virtually the entire Western media said it was a call to protect white racism—because the media deem Western civilization to be nothing more than a euphemism for white supremacy.
That’s what my tweet was about.

What If Hillary Told The Truth : Rivers Reverse Course?

Hillary and the democrats live a charmed life. No matter what they do or say, it is understood it is unfaultable and protected by ethical law. But the problem comes when those that are reporting on the democrats are unethical, immoral and criminally contemptuous of the American people, things begin to look suspiciously only just more democrat ideological debauchery.

Never vote for a democrat ever again.

What would happen if Hillary and the democrats actually told the truth?

Socialism Verses Capitalism : Democrats Verses Reality

To me this is obvious and yet for millions living large in our fantastic country they have no idea how they are able to live that way. And sadly they never will as they are progressive socialist liberal democrats that hate this country and capitalism.

Oh, and if you look at how the progressive democrats live in this ugly and racists country, they are living large, enjoying all of the fruits of your labors all the while they are sucking on the federal taxpayer tit!!!!!

Never vote for another democrat - ever!

It's about ignorance, it's about hate, it's being a progressive democrat.

Louisiana Democrats Destroying History : The 'New Normal' Is Here

What these progressive socialist liberal democrats are doing can be seen as just more of the on going disintegration of ethical and moral bases of a national party, which now must be understood to be refereed to as a ''socialist collective''.

Remember, the terrorists ISIS are using the same tactic in the middle east as they destroy ancient  historical monuments that will erase the history of the people and then replace it with a new history that more reflects their personal ideology to 'transform' the region.

The democrats, and the 'new normal' progressive liberal democrat collective are convinced they are the wave of the future, and so must do what is necessary to cement that new ideology by destroying history that the general population knows and understand as their heritage.

Still, one has to wonder who voted for these people and are they unaware of what the democrats intend for their way of life?

To rule with ultimate power over the people, the people's history, and therefore their pride must be changed to more reflect the 'new normal'. To implement a new way of life the old must be destroyed.

Louisiana Democrats Purge Thomas Jefferson, the Man Who Acquired Louisiana
Jarrett Stepman / /    

The latest in what has become an all too common crusade to wipe great American historical figures from places of honor and memory, the Louisiana Democratic Party has announced that it will change the name of its annual “Jefferson-Jackson” dinner to the bland and unremarkable True Blue Gala.

Louisiana Democrats joined many other state parties that have changed the name of the dinner, which was originally intended to celebrate two key figures in their party’s history—Presidents Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. In the words of the Louisiana Democratic Party chairwoman, removing Jefferson and Jackson was done “to reflect the progress of the party and the changing times.”

Of course, both men were slaveholders, and therefore unacceptable to modern progressives despite whatever else they may have accomplished. Yet they were both, in their own way, great Americans who made invaluable contributions to our country.

This is not the first time these two men have come under fire from activists who want them purged. Jefferson has been attacked as unacceptable at the university he founded, and efforts have been made to remove Jackson’s towering statue in New Orleans.

A Blessing for ‘Unborn Millions of Men’
What is particularly astonishing about this historical slap in the face is the fact that no two men were more responsible for the state of Louisiana’s existence than Jefferson and Jackson. It’s easy to forget that the United States—an unparalleled superpower extending from sea to shining sea—was not long ago a sparsely-populated backwater confined to the East Coast. It was the vision and statesmanship of early American leaders that led to the extension of the country westward.

Under the umbrella of the Constitution, the New World would, in the words of Jefferson, become a great “empire of liberty.”

In one of his most consequential acts as president, Jefferson took advantage of Napoleon’s need for money in his European wars to purchase just over 800,000 square miles of territory in the American West. This nearly doubled the size of the U.S. Jefferson said that the Louisiana Purchase would be “replete with blessings to unborn millions of men.” And so it was.

This masterstroke has paid dividends for over two centuries. By pushing out Old World empires and creating a haven for teeming hordes of self-governing people, America could rightfully claim to be truly the land of opportunity for the common man. But treaties and lofty ideas are often lost in an international environment of predatory powers unless backed up with real strength.

Jefferson may have acquired the Louisiana territory, but Jackson was the blade who secured it.

‘Almost a Miracle’
Jackson once remarked that our liberties would indeed be in trouble if we only employed lawyers to defend the Constitution. Gen. Andrew Jackson, a ferocious patriot and unrelenting believer in America’s destiny as the world’s greatest country, played an instrumental part in saving Louisiana and the country from conquest.

The British never recognized the American purchase of the Louisiana territory, and in the War of 1812 made serious efforts to invade and tear it away from the fragile young republic. It was truly a second war for independence. The war culminated in the Battle of New Orleans, one of the most significant military victories in the history of the United States. While the battle took place shortly after a peace treaty was signed, a defeat for American arms might have had terrible consequences.

Given the fact that they never recognized the American purchase, the British may have simply held the city that was the vital economic hub of the region. Also, Congress and Parliament had not ratified the treaty, so the British could have conceivably kept the war going.

But most importantly of all, the victory, which one newspaper called “almost a miracle,” gave pride to Americans who had often fared poorly against one of the world’s great military powers. America was not just a proposition, but resolute in its future as a free and independent country.

Jackson, and his diverse band of regular soldiers, militia, former pirates, and freed slaves, showed the world that they could defeat and annihilate a professional army from Europe. The courage and leadership he displayed at the battle ultimately led Jackson to the White House.

The End of History
It is sad and perhaps telling that Democrats no longer find it acceptable to pay tribute to these two important men. Both were once seen as champions of the common man, who through their strength and ideas defined and protected the seeds of American liberty. Democrats once made room for men like Jefferson and Jackson in their pantheon and championed their virtues while sometimes glossing over their faults. But no longer.
Why Cities Shouldn’t Take Down Confederate Statues

While it is reasonable to debate whether Americans should continue to maintain prominent memorials to Confederate leaders, the move against Jefferson and Jackson shows how this movement to create a more politically correct history makes little distinction between the men who broke up the union and those who fought to create and save it.

In that Civil War, which nearly ended the American experiment in liberty, it was those who embraced Jefferson’s immortal Declaration of Independence and Jackson’s militant unionism that saved the country and brought an end to the stain of slavery for good.

Though times and mores often change for better or worse, there is something deeply nihilistic about wiping from memory those who came before and meant so much. Jefferson and Jackson deserve better in Louisiana. Frankly, every American owes them a debt of gratitude.

Trump's Voter Fraud Commission : Interrity Is Important

In some states, voter fraud is a way of life and to take a different course to stop the corruption in the system is a 'bridge too far'. And if history is a sign post for all to see when it comes to the gathering of votes that will ultimately bring power and wealth to a select few who believe they have a divine right to rule, it will be a fight to the bitter end.

The progressives will never relent to the rule of law.

Then it becomes very clear, we have been forewarned that the opposing forces, mostly progressive liberal democrats, to stonewall voter integrity efforts of this new panel on voter fraud, will be an on-going fight with progressives into the foreseeable future.

As the saying goes, 'power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely'. The democrats have been increasingly corrupted over the decades, and now their reach for absolute power is absolute.

Meet the Elected Democrat Who Wants to Fight Voter Fraud
Fred Lucas / /    

Mark Rhodes, the Wood County, West Virginia, clerk, has seen both sides of the argument over enhancing voter access and enhancing election security, first when he was found to be deceased, and later when he won an election.

Rhodes, now a Democratic member of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, wasn’t really dead. But he was concerned he wouldn’t be able to vote when the precinct he showed up at told him he was listed as deceased in the 2000 election at the polling place. He still voted with a provisional ballot. Then in 2014, he won a county clerk election by five votes out of more than 25,000 cast.

“There are things that do happen,” he said, regarding the systems. “In 2014, in my first election as county clerk, I won by five votes out of more than 25,000 cast. So, it’s one of those things we need to have fair, clean and honest elections. There should be no doubt about those five votes.”

He was among the 12 total commissioners, seven Republicans and five Democrats, that met for the first time Wednesday. Instead of arguing whether voter fraud was real, the commissioners focused on how to prevent voter fraud, verifying the voter rolls to ensure only eligible voters are registered and voting, increasing funding for new voting machines, and ways to increase voter participation.

“I was struck by how bipartisan it was, which is a contrast with all of the criticism going on in other places. It’s clear the commissioners want to get to the truth,” J. Christian Adams, a commission member who is president of the Public Interest Legal Foundation, an organization that investigates voter fraud, told The Daily Signal after the more-than-three-hour meeting concluded. “A lot of critics are kind of flat earthers,” Adams, a former Justice Department lawyer, continued. “We’ve seen this before. A group of people have a vested interest in the status quo… have a special interest in maintaining the status quo, in this instance [that] there’s no voter fraud. They raise money from that, they have salaries, they have jobs, to tell us there is no voter fraud. So, this commission is an existential threat.”

Vice President Mike Pence is the chairman and Kansas Republican Secretary of State Kris Kobach is the vice chairman of the commission. “This commission, let me be clear—this commission has no preconceived notions or preordained results,” Pence said. “We’re fact-finders, and in the days ahead, we will gather the relevant facts and data, and at the conclusion of our work, we will present the president with a report of our findings.”

President Donald Trump, who created the commission with an executive order in May, opened the meeting with remarks before departing, and criticized some of the states that are not cooperating by providing the public information. “Every time voter fraud occurs; it cancels out the vote of a lawful citizen and undermines democracy. Can’t let that happen,” Trump said. “Any form of illegal or fraudulent voting, whether by noncitizens or the deceased, and any form of voter suppression or intimidation must be stopped.”
He added:
I’m pleased that more than 30 states have already agreed to share the information with the commission and the other states. That information will be forthcoming. If any state does not want to share this information, one has to wonder what they’re worried about. And I asked the vice president, I asked the commission: What are they worried about? There’s something. There always is.
Commission member Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, defended the mission of the panel, accusing some opponents of making defamatory statements with claims it was about voter suppression.

In an interview after the commission meeting, von Spakovsky told The Daily Signal the information some states are withholding is already a matter of public record that campaigns can obtain. “The refusal of some states to not cooperate is purely partisan,” he said. “This is public information, much of it is already out there.”

Kobach wrote a June letter to state election officials asking for voter registration data, criminal conviction data, cases where voters might be registered in more than one precinct and, if public, the last four digits of Social Security numbers.

Still, during the meeting, Democrat and former Arkansas state Rep. David Dunn expressed concerns about the letter to states asking for information about voter data. “I hope we can ensure the privacy of voting public,” Dunn said. “The letter to states still raises concerns. Any data should be held in our trust and safeguarded from any political misuse.”

Friday, July 21, 2017

Haitia Witness Against Clintons Dead : The Media Says - Nothing

It appears that the media is bringing out the long guns to refute the story that a witness against the Clintons committed suicide or was murdered and made it look like suicide. Just the fact that on Google the first item in the list is a Snopes (fact check?) pointing out that the story is false.
Just the fact that Snopes says it's false brings in the well worn tid-bit from Hillary herself, 'we must suspend disbelief' if we are to believe Snopes, an organization that has a history of protecting democrats with their fact-check malfeasance.
Still, it's up to the reader to believe or disbelieve as to what actually happened in the suicide death, murder of Eberwein, and given there are so many competing people and organizations involved here that have an axe to grid against the Clintons and those that want to protect them at any cost, there is much to believe there is something here that always tags the Clintons with corruption on a massive scale.
What I find interesting here is this does have the same smell as the suicide? of Vincent Foster, a close confident and associate of the Clintons.
The mainstream media’s silence over Klaus Eberwein’s death is deafening.
Eberwein was a former Haitian government official who was expected to expose the extent of Clinton Foundation corruption and malpractice next week.
He has been found dead in Miami at the age of 50.
The circumstances surrounding Eberwein’s death are also nothing less than unpalatable. According to Miami-Dade’s medical examiner records supervisor, the official cause of death is “gunshot to the head.“ Eberwein’s death has been registered as “suicide” by the government. But not long before his death, he acknowledged that his life was in danger because he was outspoken on the criminal activities of the Clinton Foundation. 
Eberwein was a fierce critic of the Clinton Foundation’s activities in the Caribbean island, where he served as director general of the government’s economic development agency, Fonds d’assistance économique et social, for three years. “The Clinton Foundation, they are criminals, they are thieves, they are liars, they are a disgrace,” Eberwein said at a protest outside the Clinton Foundation headquarters in Manhattan last year. Eberwein was due to appear on Tuesday before the Haitian Senate Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission where he was widely expected to testify that the Clinton Foundation misappropriated Haiti earthquake donations from international donors. But this “suicide” gets even more disturbing…
Eberwein was only 50-years-old and reportedly told acquaintances he feared for his life because of his fierce criticism of the Clinton Foundation.  His close friends and business partners were taken aback by the idea he may have committed suicide. “It’s really shocking,” said friend Gilbert Bailly. “We grew up together; he was like family.”
During and after his government tenure, Eberwein faced allegations of fraud and corruption on how the agency he headed administered funds. Among the issues was FAES’ oversight of the shoddy construction of several schools built after Haiti’s devastating Jan. 12, 2010, earthquake.  But, according to Eberwein, it was the Clinton Foundation who was deeply in the wrong – and he intended to testify and prove it on Tuesday.
According to Eberwein, a paltry 0.6 percent of donations granted by international donors to the Clinton Foundation with the express purpose of directly assisting Haitians actually ended up in the hands of Haitian organizations. A further 9.6 percent ended up with the Haitian government. The remaining 89.8 percent – or $5.4 billion – was funneled to non-Haitian organizations. –WND
Eberwein was expected to testify against the Clinton Foundation in court and ends up committing suicide shortly before.  Where have we heard this before?
Untimely deaths seem to follow the Clinton’s around, and this one especially is probably something – considering since the mainstream media is silent about this death.

Thursday, July 20, 2017

White House Panel On Voter Fraud : Democrats Run for The Exits

The hollowing from the progressive liberal democrats on even the thought that there might be investigation into voter fraud in our system of elections in America is incredibly loud and long, and rightly so I think, given that most of their vote getting power is founded in misinformation, rule deception and or criminal voter fraud.

If it isn't legal and illegal immigrants by the millions voting in many if not all states, but especially California where all you need to vote is a drivers license which all immigrants have, it's criminal felons in Virginia by the thousands casting ballots for democrats, even some from prison. Dead people, others voting many times or voting in several states at once, are just a few of the problem in our system. And voter ID? Democrats run for the exits!

Oh, let's not forget Barack telling states they had better not clean up their voter rolls and if they did he would come after them. WOW, now lets see, what party was Barack associated with? hmmmmm Was Barack a progressive democrat, maybe not, his religious affiliation was progressive, not just democrat but still a subversive jihad for change. He surly was still in favor of distorting the election process to his advantage.

White House Panel on Voter Fraud Begins Work
Fred Lucas / /    

A presidential commission to examine voter fraud and the soundness of election systems across the country has a big job ahead as it convenes Wednesday for the first time. Not only is the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity charged with investigating what to do about voter fraud cases and establishing best practices, it must do so despite meeting with resistance from some state election officials.

The initial meeting, set for 11 a.m. in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, will be livestreamed on One tool at the commission’s disposal is a database from The Heritage Foundation that compiles 1,071 cases of proven instances of voter fraud across the United States, the bulk of them prosecuted since 2000.

Most of those cases, 938, ended in a criminal conviction. Another 43 ended in civil penalties. A judge directed the defendant into a pretrial diversion program in 74 cases, and 16 ended in judicial or official findings.

The cases of proven fraud took place in 47 states, according to the database.

“A big advantage of the database is that it shows all the different ways that fraud can be committed,” commission member Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal. “It demonstrates, for example, you don’t only have to worry about vote-buying. A lot of cases involved that, but you also have to worry about what are the rules governing absentee ballots, since there are a lot of cases in the database of people casting absentee ballots.”
The Daily Signal is Heritage’s multimedia news organization.

President Donald Trump created the bipartisan commission through an executive order in May. He named Vice President Mike Pence as chairman and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, also a Republican, as co-chairman. The 12-member commission includes three current or former Democratic officeholders: New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner, Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap, and former Arkansas state Rep. David Dunn. The agenda for the first meeting appears broad, not focused on specific issues of ensuring clean elections.

Trump has complained of 3 million to 5 million fraudulent votes in the 2016 presidential election that lifted Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s vote tally. Critics of the commission, including California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, a Democrat who oversees elections in that state, have said the panel is only trying to prove Trump actually won the popular vote as well as the Electoral College. But von Spakovsky says that is not the goal.

“The whole purpose of the commission is to take a look at the entire American election process, from the voter registration system, to the casting of ballots, to counting of ballots, to the security—including cybersecurity—that surrounds all of this,” said von Spakovsky, previously both a Justice Department lawyer and member of the Federal Election Commission. “We’re not only trying to look at what problems exist, but also [determine] have people taken advantage of those problems.”

Despite resistance from some states in providing information to the commission, White House press secretary Sean Spicer said he believes most state election data will be obtainable—and without buying it, as political campaigns and private companies do. “Most of this information is available,” Spicer told The Daily Signal. “All that those companies are doing is buying it from the states. So I don’t think there would be any reason to go to a private vendor. I think we should be able to do this utilizing official resources that exist within a state. “
He added:
Again, I think there’s been some miscommunication on what they’re seeking. The commission has asked that each state provide that information that is public, that they share. And because that varies from state to state, what they’re willing to give out, the commission was illustrative in its letter [to state election officials] in trying to describe what it was looking for. But I think we’re going to move forward very well.
Liberal groups such as the Brennan Center for Justice and the League of Women Voters, which have opposed voter ID laws and other voter integrity measures, sued Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson, a Republican commission member, because she’s providing the information.

Voter ID laws require voters to first show photo identification, such as a driver’s license or a special voter ID card, to demonstrate they are who they say they are and live where they say they do.
“The commission cannot bypass state rules designed to protect sensitive voter information,” said Myrna Pérez, deputy director of the Brennan Center’s Democracy Program, in a public statement. “Lawson might be a member of this panel, but her first duty is to the Hoosiers who trusted her with personal information so that they could participate in fair and free elections in the state. She must proceed carefully and with legally mandated procedures before sharing voter data.”

Pence is the former governor of Indiana, which he also represented in the U.S. House.
The panel likely will push best practices among states, such as voter ID and updating voter registration rolls, said Jason Snead, a legal policy analyst with The Heritage Foundation, who studies voter fraud and helps maintain the think tank’s database on voter fraud.
Snead noted a Pew Research Center study that found 1.8 million dead people were listed as voters, 12 million records with incorrect data, and 2.75 million persons registered in more than one state.

Debbie ''Blabbermouth'' Schultz Under Investiation : Police Take Her Computer

The question that remains is, who in the hell is in charge here? This topic is not new as I and many  others have written on several occasion about the absolute criminal  incompetence on the part of Debbie ''Blabbermouth'' Schultz who knowingly and willingly allowed the subversives in her employ to reek havoc on her and her staff as well as other progressive liberal democrats in congress.

Nancy Pelosi was unaware of domestic terrorist working as democrat IT guys? Well, maybe. It does make some sense given when every waking minute of everyday is hate for Republicans and Trump, how much time can be left for national security?

'Subversion? ' says Schultz, 'What are you talking about? Our computer system have been compromised by foreign agents is nonsense. There is nothing to see here and nothing to investigate. The police that stole my computer' says Blabbermouth 'is a criminal act and I want it back. I have sensitive information that must not be released to the public as it might look like I am guilty of subversion myself.'

Debbie who was point man for the destruction of Bernie Sanders. But guilty of subversion? Say it 'aint so!

What? Maybe guilty? Debbie is a ultra-left progressive democrat. She has to be guilty of at least being stupid and willingly being used for a foreign terrorists dupe.

These House Democrats Heard They May Have Been Hacked but Don’t Seem to Care
Luke Rosiak / /    

House Democrats professing moral outrage over the hacking of the Democratic National Committee have apparently remained indifferent to the likely penetration of their congressional computer systems, declining to distance themselves from five Pakistani House server administrators who are the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation.

House authorities banned the five administrators from the congressional information technology network in February as part of a Capitol Police criminal investigation in what Politico described as “serious, potentially illegal, violations on the House IT network.”
Imran, Abid, and Jamal Awan; Hina Alvi; Natalia Sova; and Rao Abbas set up the email accounts and computer systems for dozens of members of Congress and their staffs, and they could read all emails and files on those systems.

A fellow congressional IT aide told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group that potentially sensitive information was being transmitted to an off-site server.

Capitol Police seized a laptop computer tied to Florida Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz—who resigned in July 2016 as DNC chairman following the committee’s hacking—during the investigation. The laptop was tied to Imran, her top IT person since 2005 who is under criminal investigation.

But instead of praising the Capitol Police for stopping a security breach, the Florida Democrat demanded they return the laptop to her even though it could be evidence needed to build the case. She threatened the police chief with “consequences” if it wasn’t returned.

Democrats have claimed they deplore hacking and view cyberattacks as a dangerous frontier. Wasserman Schultz introduced an amendment Thursday aimed at blocking a “security clearance for any individual in a position in the Executive Office of the President, who is under a criminal investigation by a federal law enforcement agency for aiding a foreign government.” Yet the lawmaker has refused to fire Imran even after House law enforcement banned him from the network.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said she wasn’t familiar with the issue. “I haven’t followed that very closely,” she said. She shrugged at Wasserman Schultz’s continued employment of Imran, saying, “There are plenty of people who are under investigation who still have their jobs.”
Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., wrote a letter accusing President Donald Trump of jeopardizing national security by not taking cyber protections seriously. He noted that he had majored in computer science in college.

Lieu gave Abid server access when the latter had a criminal record, a recent bankruptcy, a public lawsuit involving allegations of fraud in a car dealership he was running while supposedly also working on the Hill, and there were widespread rumors that Abid’s numerous relatives on the House payroll were running a fraudulent scheme. The lawsuit also disclosed that Abid’s business received $100,000 from an Iraqi politician who is a fugitive from the Department of Justice.

Lieu did not fire Abid until March 10, more than a month after being informed of the Capitol Police investigation and after media reports that the Pakistani’s stepmother alleged in Fairfax County court that he had used high-tech devices to wiretap and extort her.

Lieu spokesman Jack D’Annibale did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment—both after the congressman was informed of the criminal probe and after the letter to Trump. The Daily Caller News Foundation asked what Lieu has done to determine if any of his congressional emails or files had been compromised and what was done to prevent a recurrence.
“I hear two sides of the story, some people say it’s because he’s Muslim that he’s being railroaded, other people say he made some bad decisions. I don’t know enough about it,” Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo., said.

Cleaver told The Daily Caller’s Kerry Picket that it didn’t occur to him that crimes involving his IT guy could pose a risk to the security of his data. “Emails? This is the first I’ve heard about that … You mean the one from the election?” Cleaver said. “This is the first I’ve heard of that. Talk to me tomorrow because I don’t know enough about it to be intelligent.”

DNC spokeswoman Adrienne Watson has said, “Russians attacked the DNC in an effort to disrupt our election,” and Trump “has shown zero interest in protecting our country from future attacks.”
The deputy chairman of the DNC, Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., told The Daily Caller, “I’m at a massive disadvantage because I don’t really know the issue at all.”

But either the Minnesota Democrat or his staff did not seem particularly interested to find out as The Daily Caller News Foundation had emailed both Brett Morrow, a spokesman for Ellison’s congressional office, and Eric Walker, a DNC spokesman, weeks prior with information and questions. Those emails went unreturned, and did not result in a briefing on the Capitol Police investigation.

Despite four of the Awans being paid unusually high salaries — averaging around $160,000 and cumulatively totaling $4 million between 2009 and 2016 — other congressional IT aides have told The Daily Caller News Foundation they believe many of the suspects were “ghost employees.”
Abbas, for example, lived in the basement of a house that Imran owned and worked at McDonald’s until he was fired from that job. He was home all day, his housemate said.

A member of Congress’ signature is required on a form giving an IT aide administrative access, raising questions about why members would give server access to someone with questionable credentials and keep paying someone who they may have never seen.

“Who? I don’t even know him,” Cleaver said, adding that his chief of staff put Abbas on the payroll.
Reps. Ted Deutch and Charlie Crist, both Florida Democrats, and Nevada Democratic Rep. Jacky Rosen also employed Abbas and refused to say if they had ever seen the IT aide they were paying. Cleaver employed five out of the six suspects at various times, and Deutch employed three.
Hilarie Chambers, Michigan Democratic Rep. Sander Levin’s chief of staff, said, “After being notified by the House Administration Committee, [Abid] was removed from our payroll. We are confident that everything in our office is secure.”

Chambers did not explain why she was confident Levin’s office is secure, given that there would be no record of IT aides making copies of data.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email

Slavery Is Unique to America? : Walter E. Williams Says, Nonsense!

I still wonder just where these people come from, and where do they live given how hateful they are for the country that has give them everything, especially those that are tasked to educate the next generation.

That a educator would actually teach that the United States was unique in it's approval and use of slavery, one needs to ''suspend disbelief'' to comprehend such staggering ideological hatred for our country and it's true history that is based and fundamental to individual freedom and liberty

I believe the progressive liberal ideology that is prevalent in education system today, at all levels, even elementary and before, is to change our country from a free civil society based on the rule of law as stated in our Constitution, to a country that is based on the central authority of a few elites, whose power it will be to set rules and regulations for the population.

Again, as I have stated many times here, describing the progressive liberal rules for power,  the foundational law is and always has been, ''From each according to one's abilities and To each according to one's needs"".

And any opposition to the central authority's rule will seen as a crime against the state. The punishment for those crimes will be sever as the state cannot and will not allow individual thought or the freedom to chose.

Never forget, as the ''transformation'' of our country is unfolding now as our universities are falling to chaos nd conflict and our central government is paralyzed by the same hateful parties that are destroying our educational systems, we are, by any definition of the word, actually and literally at war for the heart and soul of our country.

The Key Facts About Slavery That the Left Conveniently Ignores
Walter E. Williams /

Too many people believe that slavery is a “peculiar institution.” That’s what Kenneth Stampp called slavery in his book, “Peculiar Institution: Slavery in the Ante-Bellum South.” But slavery is by no means peculiar, odd, or unusual. It was common among ancient peoples such as the Egyptians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Hittites, Greeks, Persians, Armenians, and many others.

Large numbers of Christians were enslaved during the Ottoman wars in Europe. White slaves were common in Europe from the Dark Ages to the Middle Ages. It was only after A.D. 1600 that Europeans joined with Arabs and Africans and started the Atlantic slave trade.

As David P. Forsythe wrote in his book, “The Globalist,” “The fact remained that at the beginning of the 19th century an estimated three-quarters of all people alive were trapped in bondage against their will either in some form of slavery or serfdom.” While slavery constitutes one of the grossest encroachments on human liberty, it is by no means unique or restricted to the Western world or United States, as many liberal academics would have us believe.

Much of their indoctrination of our young people, at all levels of education, paints our nation’s Founders as racist adherents to slavery, but the story is not so simple.

At the time of the 1787 Constitutional Convention, slaves were about 40 percent of the population of the Southern colonies. Apportionment in the House of Representatives and the number of electoral votes each state would have in presidential elections would be based upon population.
Southern delegates to the convention wanted slaves to be counted as one person. Northern delegates to the convention, and those opposed to slavery, wanted only free persons of each state to be counted for the purposes of apportionment in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College.

The compromise reached was that each slave would be counted as only three-fifths of a person.
Many criticize this compromise as proof of racism. My question to these grossly uninformed critics is whether they would have found it more preferable for slaves to be counted as whole persons. Slaves counted as whole persons would have given slaveholding Southern states much more political power.
Or, would the critics of the Founders prefer that the Northern delegates not compromise and not allow slaves to be counted at all. If they hadn’t, it is likely that the Constitution would have not been ratified.

Thus, the question that emerges is whether blacks would be better off with Northern states having gone their way and Southern states having gone theirs, resulting in no U.S. Constitution and no Union?

Unlike today’s pseudointellectuals, black abolitionist Frederick Douglass understood the compromise, saying that the three-fifths clause was “a downright disability laid upon the slaveholding states” that deprived them of “two-fifths of their natural basis of representation.”
Douglass’ vision was shared by Patrick Henry and others. Henry said, expressing the reality of the three-fifths compromise, “As much as I deplore slavery, I see that prudence forbids its abolition.”
With this union, Congress at least had the power to abolish slave trade by 1808. According to Delegate James Wilson, many believed the anti-slave trade clause laid “the foundation for banishing slavery out of this country.” Many of the Founders abhorred slavery. Their statements can be read on my website,

The most unique aspect of slavery in the Western world was the moral outrage against it, which began to emerge in the 18th century and led to massive elimination efforts. It was Britain’s military sea power that put an end to the slave trade. And our country fought a costly war that brought an end to slavery.

Unfortunately, these facts about slavery are not in the lessons taught in our schools and colleges. Instead, there is gross misrepresentation and suggestion that slavery was a uniquely American practice.