One has to wonder why Chris Wallace makes the decision to take sides in a debate that has such consequences for everyone. It would be reasonable to believe that Wallace, as a reporter for FOX would have some sort of common sense not to attack the president with demands that are unreasonable and obviously biased against him.
But the truth seems clear from the last debate, Wallace took advantage of is position as moderator to demand answers about a past argument where the answers from the president were not clear enough to satisfy the mains stream media and other progressive socialist democraaats.
The question is why did he do this? Why did Wallace if it necessary to take sides in this debate?
No comments:
Post a Comment