Sunday, June 08, 2014

Progressive Socialist Senator Harry Reid Investigated for Ethics Violations - Who Knew?


Harry Reid Loses Mental Capacity for Truth Telling
I wonder why it has taken so long to investigate Mr Reid for not just for his ethics but for his inability to recognize even the most basic law of common decency.

 Harry Reid is not a responsible individual, but a mentally deficient person that needs to treated by some professional in the medical field.

But then under such scrutiny there are many on the progressive left that appear to have the same failings that so vividly show up in Reid.

It's just that Mr Reid has no qualms about telling the world just how he lacks any sense of morally when lies bold face on national television or in print while the others in the democrat party hide their true intentions to subvert the rule of law to advance their personal and parties agenda.

Again, progressive liberal socialism is a genetic defect, a disease that infects ones mental capacity to recognize reality as a moral trait to be a responsible citizen or leader. It appears Mr Reid has no concept of right or wrong but forges ahead with one irresponsible statement after another that he believes will cause his agenda to succeed where others that have tried unsuccessfully to legitimately advance their liberal socialist agenda.

Moral law or the law of ethics means nothing Mr Reid. Little wonder he and others are front and center for ethics and possible criminal violations.

Ethics Complaint Targets Harry Reid for Abuse of Power
Josh Siegel /           

Tea Party Patriots filed an ethics complaint against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., alleging he has abused his power in a campaign to smear conservative donors.

The complaint, filed Monday with the Senate Select Committee on Ethics, alleges Reid has purposely tried to damage the names of Charles and David Koch, prominent conservative donors whom Reid has publicly criticized for running advertisements attacking Democrats. It also cites Reid’s partisan campaign activities, which allegedly violate Senate rules and federal law.

Tea Party Patriots filed a separate complaint against Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., for his alleged role in influencing the Internal Revenue Service to scrutinize conservative nonprofit groups.
“Whitehouse exerted pressure on federal agencies to target tea party non-profits and to criminally prosecute groups such as ours,” the complaint reads.Whitehouse was the main sponsor of the DISCLOSE Act, legislation that would have forced nonprofits who make campaign donations to disclose their donors.

Cleta Mitchell, an attorney representing the Tea Party Patriots, says the complaints were timed to coincide with a Senate Judiciary Committee meeting Tuesday, where congressional leaders, including Reid, clashed over a proposed constitutional amendment to curb political spending.
“We are tired of Reid, Democratic senators, and the White House bullying conservatives and conservative donors,” Mitchell said. “They do not respect the First Amendment rights of citizens and we are sick of it, so we are fighting back.”

Speaking at the Senate Judiciary Committee meeting, Reid defended the proposed amendment, a plan that Democrats plan to vote on this year. “I support this constitutional amendment,” Reid said. “Our involvement in government should not be dependent on bank account balances. It’s bad for America. What the nation needs is to bring sanity back to campaigns.”

Upon receiving a complaint, the Senate Select Committee on Ethics, chaired by Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., will initiate a preliminary inquiry to review the case. If the committee finds substantial evidence, it can issue a public or private letter of admonition, or initiate an adjudicatory review. It can then recommend the Senate take disciplinary action.

In another, unrelated complaint filed Tuesday with the Senate Select Committee on Ethics, the Center for Competitive Politics, another conservative nonprofit, charges nine Democratic senators with “interfering with the administrative proceedings of the IRS.”

.

No comments: