It makes sense that Schumer would propose a permanent subside for green energy expansion all based on climate change.
Even for those among us that are mentally damaged understand climate change is hocks, a fraud, a scam to steal tax dollars that benefit a small elite group of people.
And that Schumer is leading the charge for this insanity speaks volumes about his abilities to form coherent ideas on anything of substance. After all he is a progressive socialist liberal democrat which explains everything relating to the qualities for rational thought.
And being a New York political lunatic as well tells still another story about politicians from that great state. Bill de Blasio? Andrew Cuomo? Does it seem New York has more then it share of the unhinged? Who voted for these people and why?
Even for those among us that are mentally damaged understand climate change is hocks, a fraud, a scam to steal tax dollars that benefit a small elite group of people.
And that Schumer is leading the charge for this insanity speaks volumes about his abilities to form coherent ideas on anything of substance. After all he is a progressive socialist liberal democrat which explains everything relating to the qualities for rational thought.
And being a New York political lunatic as well tells still another story about politicians from that great state. Bill de Blasio? Andrew Cuomo? Does it seem New York has more then it share of the unhinged? Who voted for these people and why?
Schumer’s Green Energy Subsidies Cost Much More Than Trump’s Wall
The government is shut down over border wall funding, but only a month ago Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer asked President Donald Trump to support billions in green energy subsidies.
Schumer, a New York Democrat, in early December asked Trump to support “permanent tax incentives for domestic production of clean electricity and storage, energy efficient homes and commercial buildings, electric vehicles, and modernizing the electric grid.”
“If left unchecked, the damage caused by climate change will cause untold human suffering and significant damage to the U.S. economy,” Schumer wrote to Trump on Dec. 6.
Extending tax subsidy provisions primarily benefiting wind and solar power would cost nearly $32 billion over the next four years, according to Joint Committee on Taxation estimates. Permanently extending these tax subsidies could add billions more to the tab. The committee estimates solar and wind tax subsidies will cost more than $7 billion in 2019.
Based on committee estimates, continuing solar and wind tax subsidies is nearly six times the $5.7 billion Trump is asking from Congress for a border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.
The total cost of a wall to cover the nearly 2,000-mile southern border could be as high as $25 billion, according to the White House, though other estimates have put the cost of a border wall as high as $60 billion based on the projected per-mile cost.
The battle over border wall funding forced Congress to sideline its year-end debate over “tax extenders,” which includes 11 green energy-related tax benefits that would cost roughly $53 billion over 10 years if they were made permanent, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. Extending these tax credits just one year is estimated to cost roughly $5 billion.
These energy tax subsidies expired at the end of 2017, the costliest of which are tax incentives for biodiesel, alternative fuels, and residential energy efficiency. If made permanent, those programs would cost more than nine times what Trump asked from Congress in border wall funding.
The two costliest green subsidies, the production tax credit and investment tax credit, primarily benefit wind turbines and solar panels, respectively. Many Republicans and conservative groups have called for eliminating green tax subsidies.
Both the production tax credit and investment tax credit are set to expire at the end of 2021. However, given the White House’s opposition to some green energy tax subsidies, some conservatives suggest ending those and put the funds toward a border wall.
“This only makes sense, and with the additional funds we could paint it green,” Dan Kish, a senior distinguished fellow at the free-market Institute for Energy Research, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “It’s a win-win.”
But could a deal like this ever be cut? Dan Whitten, vice president of public affairs for the Solar Energy Industries Association, doesn’t think so. “Given its strong bipartisan support, this seems like a nonstarter,” Whitten told The Daily Caller News Foundation.
“As for the notion of terminating the existing ITC (investment tax credit), that is something we would strenuously oppose,” Whitten said. “It is one of the most successful energy incentives to date, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and tens of billions of dollars in economic activity.”
The Solar Energy Industries Association has not asked Congress to extend the investment tax credit, which is set to sunset at the end of 2021. However, there is a permanent 10 percent investment tax credit for solar and geothermal installations.
The American Wind Energy Association did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
Sixteen days after Schumer sent his letter, Trump refused to sign legislation to keep the federal government open without $5.7 billion in border wall funding. Congressional Democrats refused and the government shutdown began.
The ongoing shutdown tied with the 1995-1996 shutdown during the Clinton administration, which lasted for 21 days. On Saturday, the current shutdown will become the longest in U.S. history if no deal to reopen the government is made.
Schumer’s office did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment