Mr Objma believes Ms Wright will serve with distinction as a federal judge in Minnesota and I believe as well she will do just that. And by distinction, of course, Mr Objma means she will toe the ideological line of the progressive socialist liberal democrats just as Loretta Lynch is doing now and Eric Holder did before her as Attorney General of the United States.
Know this, these two lawyers would not be where they are today if the powers in the progressive socialist democrat headquarters didn't believe, beyond a doubt, they will continue the legacy of progressive socialist justice in America.
And never fear the Republicans will confirm her without reservation. Just imagine if the progressive democrats had the majority in the senate, and a confirmed Conservative nominee came before the committee for confirmation what the outcome would be.
Remember how the democrats treated Bork, Alito and Roberts among others. The vitriol was so bad in the hearings by the democrats it drove the wife of one of the nominee out of the room in tears. There was any apologizes from the democrats for the vicious attacks, they loved it!! It's who they are.
Believe me, the confirmation hearing for a Conservative wouldn't be proper for the entire family to watch.
Obama Judicial Nominee Who Accused Reagan of ‘Bigotry’ Faces Confirmation Vote
Philip Wegmann / @PhilipWegmann
President Obama’s nominee for a federal judgeship in Minnesota accused the Reagan administration of “bigotry” in her writing for the prestigious UCLA Law Review in 1989.
Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Wilhelmina Wright, who is expected to win Senate confirmation to federal District Court in her state next Tuesday, wrote the accusation shortly before graduating Harvard Law School. Wright accused Chief Justice William Rehnquist and President Reagan of aiding “white people [who] are running and hiding” from desegregated public schools. While a third year law student, Wright wrote about the demographic shift of white families leaving cities for the suburbs:
Their mad scramble is aided by a Chief Justice who owned racially restrictive property and a Presidential administration that believes bigotry, poverty, and poor educational opportunities for most public school students are the unavoidable fruits of a ‘thriving’ free market economy.
Later in the same law review, but while addressing a different topic, Wright wrote that “the sanctity of property and the belief in the hierarchy of races” undergirds racism in America. Property rights, she continued, are “firmly protected by the words and action of the Constitution.” When questioned by the Senate Judiciary Committee about these remarks on property rights, Wright said her words require additional context.
Stressing her inexperience at the time, Wright said the writing was “inartful” and made without “all of the training and experience that I have now.” Wright said she was “owning that I did write those words,” but explained that she was addressing racist housing customs in white neighborhoods known as “racially restrictive covenants.” The justice adamantly insisted she supports property rights as espoused in the Constitution. Wright’s nomination advanced out of the Judiciary Committee by a voice vote and awaits confirmation on the Senate floor.
Sens. Al Franken and Amy Klobuchar, both D-Minn., have shepherded Wright through the Senate process after recommending her nomination to President Obama last February. “This is more than anything the pivotal moment,” Klobuchar told the Minneapolis Star Tribune in December. “All expectations are that she will pass.”
If confirmed, Wright would become the first black judge to sit on the District Court in Minnesota.
Relatively young at 52, Wright is seen as a possible addition to the Democratic short list for nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. She has served as a judge at every level of the Minnesota state court system and has more than 25 years of experience.
Although ahead by one year, first lady Michelle Obama attended Harvard Law School at the same time as Wright. “I am proud to nominate Justice Wilhelmina Marie Wright to serve on the United States District Court bench,” Obama said in nominating her last April. “She has a long and distinguished record of service, and I am confident she will serve on the federal bench with distinction.”
Know this, these two lawyers would not be where they are today if the powers in the progressive socialist democrat headquarters didn't believe, beyond a doubt, they will continue the legacy of progressive socialist justice in America.
And never fear the Republicans will confirm her without reservation. Just imagine if the progressive democrats had the majority in the senate, and a confirmed Conservative nominee came before the committee for confirmation what the outcome would be.
Remember how the democrats treated Bork, Alito and Roberts among others. The vitriol was so bad in the hearings by the democrats it drove the wife of one of the nominee out of the room in tears. There was any apologizes from the democrats for the vicious attacks, they loved it!! It's who they are.
Believe me, the confirmation hearing for a Conservative wouldn't be proper for the entire family to watch.
Obama Judicial Nominee Who Accused Reagan of ‘Bigotry’ Faces Confirmation Vote
Philip Wegmann / @PhilipWegmann
President Obama’s nominee for a federal judgeship in Minnesota accused the Reagan administration of “bigotry” in her writing for the prestigious UCLA Law Review in 1989.
Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Wilhelmina Wright, who is expected to win Senate confirmation to federal District Court in her state next Tuesday, wrote the accusation shortly before graduating Harvard Law School. Wright accused Chief Justice William Rehnquist and President Reagan of aiding “white people [who] are running and hiding” from desegregated public schools. While a third year law student, Wright wrote about the demographic shift of white families leaving cities for the suburbs:
Their mad scramble is aided by a Chief Justice who owned racially restrictive property and a Presidential administration that believes bigotry, poverty, and poor educational opportunities for most public school students are the unavoidable fruits of a ‘thriving’ free market economy.
Later in the same law review, but while addressing a different topic, Wright wrote that “the sanctity of property and the belief in the hierarchy of races” undergirds racism in America. Property rights, she continued, are “firmly protected by the words and action of the Constitution.” When questioned by the Senate Judiciary Committee about these remarks on property rights, Wright said her words require additional context.
Stressing her inexperience at the time, Wright said the writing was “inartful” and made without “all of the training and experience that I have now.” Wright said she was “owning that I did write those words,” but explained that she was addressing racist housing customs in white neighborhoods known as “racially restrictive covenants.” The justice adamantly insisted she supports property rights as espoused in the Constitution. Wright’s nomination advanced out of the Judiciary Committee by a voice vote and awaits confirmation on the Senate floor.
Sens. Al Franken and Amy Klobuchar, both D-Minn., have shepherded Wright through the Senate process after recommending her nomination to President Obama last February. “This is more than anything the pivotal moment,” Klobuchar told the Minneapolis Star Tribune in December. “All expectations are that she will pass.”
If confirmed, Wright would become the first black judge to sit on the District Court in Minnesota.
Relatively young at 52, Wright is seen as a possible addition to the Democratic short list for nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. She has served as a judge at every level of the Minnesota state court system and has more than 25 years of experience.
Although ahead by one year, first lady Michelle Obama attended Harvard Law School at the same time as Wright. “I am proud to nominate Justice Wilhelmina Marie Wright to serve on the United States District Court bench,” Obama said in nominating her last April. “She has a long and distinguished record of service, and I am confident she will serve on the federal bench with distinction.”
No comments:
Post a Comment