Coal Is Bad for You : ObamaCare is Good For You

'Oh wait, I know what we should do, get rid of coal - who needs it - lets live in cardboard boxes and eat dirt - if you want hot water, just wait until the wind blows then wait in lime at the public showers, maybe next week the weather man says wind might begin to blow, or if the sun come out this spring the solar panels might be enough to give a few hours of fun, that is if the batteries are fully charged, then things will be great (that is if you don't freeze to death).

 'But wait - ah, this isn't for us, you live in a cardboard box, not me,  I live in Washington in a fine house with electricity all day long, and as your commander and chief I have needs for better things as I have to lead you - hehe - know what I mean - ' - -

Energy: One Lump or Two?

Steven Hayward

Groundhog Day is just a few weeks off, which means it’s time for another post about . . . energy.
What did environmentalists get in their Christmas stockings from Santa?  A big lump of coal.  More than one lump in fact.  If the world’s energy mix were analogized to getting a cup of coffee at Starbucks, we’d see everyone getting two lumps in their latte.
There’s no doubt that the unexpected abundance of cheap natural gas combined with the EPA’s lawless drive to exterminate coal—still the leading source of electric power in the US—is taking a fearsome toll on America’s coal industry.  But if you draw back a bit and take a look around the world, what you find is that the fastest growing source of energy continues to be: Coal.
Reuters reports the other day:

China approved the construction of more than 100 million tonnes of new coal production capacity in 2013 – six times more than a year earlier and equal to 10 percent of U.S. annual usage – flying in the face of plans to tackle choking air pollution.
The scale of the increase, which only includes major mines, reflects Beijing’s aim to put 860 million tonnes of new coal production capacity into operation over the five years to 2015, more than the entire annual output of India.

Here’s what the chart of China’s projected coal use from the International Energy Agency looks like:

Well, okay, that’s China, a still-developing country that wants to get rich before it cleans up.  Surely no advanced, enlightened country, like, say solar- and wind-loving Germany, would do such a thing.  Oops.  The story isn’t working out so well.
First, some windless and cloudy days last month rendered Germany almost entirely dependent on old-fashioned fossil fuels and nuclear to provide their electricity, as Die Welt reports (as translated by the GWPF):

Germany’s wind and solar power production came to an almost complete standstill in early December. More than 23,000 wind turbines stood still. One million photovoltaic systems stopped work nearly completely. For a whole week coal, nuclear and gas power plants had to generate an estimated 95 percent of Germany’s electricity supply.

But what will happen when Germany shuts down all its nukes because they fear a tsunami from the North Sea? They’re going to build more coal plants:

Germany’s energy transition has also been a transition to coal: Despite multi-billion subsidies for renewable energy sources, power generation from brown coal (lignite) has climbed to its highest level in Germany since 1990. It is especially coal-fired power plants that are replacing the eight nuclear power plants that were shut down, while less CO2-intensive, but more expensive gas-fired power plants are currently barely competitive. Energy expert Patrick Graichen speaks of Germany’s “energy transition paradox”: the development of solar and wind farms, yet rising carbon dioxide-emissions.

Here’s the chart:
This story isn’t just limited to Germany.  From Bloomberg:

Europe’s appetite for cheaper electricity is reviving mines that produce the dirtiest type of coal, threatening to boost pollution and raze villages that have survived since medieval times.
Across the continent’s mining belt, from Germany to Poland and the Czech Republic, utilities such as Vattenfall AB, CEZ AS and PGE SA are expanding open-pit mines that produce lignite. The moist, brown form of the fossil fuel packs less energy and more carbon than more frequently burned hard coal.
The projects go against the grain of European Union rules limiting emissions and pushing cleaner energy. Alarmed at power prices about double U.S. levels, policy makers are allowing the expansion of coal mines that were scaled back in the past two decades, stirring a backlash in the targeted communities.

Then, too, the Wall Street Journal reported last week:

Coal remains the biggest source of fuel for generating electricity in the U.S. and coal exports are growing fast. Demand is being stoked by the rise of power-hungry middle classes in emerging economies, led by China and India. By the end of this decade, coal is expected to surpass oil as the world’s dominant fuel source, according to a recent study by consultant Wood Mackenzie.

This is what happens reality intrudes on green dreams.  The greens better get used to taking their (coal) lumps.