Given the results of Mr Obama's administration efforts to create jobs, three stimulus plans costing trillions of dollars and with more spending to come, it doesn't take much imagination to see the progressive socialist liberal ideology is a complete failure. On several occasions Mr Obama actually admitted as much. Mr Obama believes we just didn't spend enough, that's why the stimulus failed.
Why this is lost on so many among us is truly amazing. How can so many look at the findings of nearly every agency that collects this information and with the results being posted everywhere, these people still believe we are on the right path to recovery. Something is very wrong here.
America's Underemployment Issue
Source: Wendell Cox, "Underemployment in America," New Geography, October 29, 2013.
November 20, 2013
The nation's lackluster economic performance continues to be a concern. This is evident in stubbornly high unemployment rates, which continue to be well above historic norms. There is another indicator, which may be even more important -- underemployment, says Wendell Cox, an adjunct scholar with the National Center for Policy Analysis and principal of the consulting firm Demographia.
Both rates are reported by the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The national underemployment rate is far higher than the unemployment rate.
The inability of state and local governments to fund their government employee pension programs could lead, in the worst case, to much higher taxes or severe service cutbacks.Yet things could get worse. The soon to be implemented "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" has built-in incentives for employers to shift workers to part-time status. The law exempts them from providing health insurance for employees who work part-time and so some establishments are shifting full-time employees to part-time status.
All of this points to an important policy implication: The necessity of focusing on the underemployment measure, the improvement of which is so crucial to maintaining and improving the standard of living and reducing poverty (by reducing the productivity gap).
Both rates are reported by the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The national underemployment rate is far higher than the unemployment rate.
- The 2012 underemployment rate was 14.7 percent, compared to the unemployment rate of 8.1 percent.
- The total unemployed population was 12.5 million in 2012, while the total underemployed population was 23.1 million.
- Researchers at Gallup estimated the nation's underemployment rate at 17.4 percent in August, well above the BLS August figure of 14.7 percent. The Gallup estimate would place underemployed workers at more than 27 million.
- Underemployment in the states is highest in some Western and Midwestern states. For the 12 months ended June 30, Nevada had the highest underemployment rate, at 20.3 percent. California was second, at 19.3 percent, while Oregon had the third highest underemployment rate, at 16.9 percent. Michigan and Illinois were tied for fourth highest, at 16.1 percent.
The inability of state and local governments to fund their government employee pension programs could lead, in the worst case, to much higher taxes or severe service cutbacks.Yet things could get worse. The soon to be implemented "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" has built-in incentives for employers to shift workers to part-time status. The law exempts them from providing health insurance for employees who work part-time and so some establishments are shifting full-time employees to part-time status.
All of this points to an important policy implication: The necessity of focusing on the underemployment measure, the improvement of which is so crucial to maintaining and improving the standard of living and reducing poverty (by reducing the productivity gap).
No comments:
Post a Comment