Thursday, October 11, 2012

Wind Power : Comes from Nowhere - Goes Nowhere

This is not rocket science - wind electrical generation is limited in so many ways that it does not even reach the bottom limits of coal, natural gas or nuclear.

Question, who will pay for the maintenance of these monsters with the subsides stop? And what about the eco-fascists that are killing coal fire plants by the dozens, where will the power come from with no back up generation capacity, storage or transmission lines?

This is insane! But no one every claimed that an environmentalist was sane, just mentally deranged progressive socialists.

The Limits of Wind Power
Source: William J. Korchinski and Julian Morris, "The Limits of Wind Power," Reason Foundation, October 4, 2012.

October 11, 2012
Environmentalists advocate wind power as one of the main alternatives to fossil fuels, claiming that it is both cost effective and low in carbon emissions. A new study by William J. Korchinski and Julian Morris of the Reason Foundation seeks to evaluate these claims.

•Existing estimates of the life-cycle emissions from wind turbines range from 5 to 100 grams (g) of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent per kilowatt hour (kWh) of electricity produced.
•This very wide range is explained by differences in what was included in each analysis, and the proportion of electricity generated by wind.

Wind blows at speeds that vary considerably, leading to wide variations in power output. To address this variability, power supply companies must install backup capacity, which kicks in when demand exceeds supply from the wind turbines. The need for this backup capacity significantly increases the cost of producing power from wind. Since backup power in most cases comes from fossil fuel generators, this effectively limits the carbon-reducing potential of new wind capacity.

The extent to which CO2 emissions can be reduced by using wind power ultimately depends on the specific characteristics of an existing power grid and the amount of additional wind-induced variability risk the grid operator will tolerate.

•A conservative grid operator can achieve CO2 emissions reduction via increased wind power of approximately 18g of CO2 equivalent/kWh, or about 3.6 percent of total emissions from electricity generation.
•The analysis reported in this study indicates that 20 percent would be the extreme upper limit for wind penetration.
•At this level the CO2 emissions reduction is 90g of CO2 equivalent/kWh, or about 18 percent of total emissions from electricity generation.
•Using wind to reduce CO2 to this level costs $150 per metric ton (i.e. 1,000 kilograms, or 2,200 lbs) of CO2 reduced.

Very high wind penetrations are not achievable in practice due to the increased need for power storage, the decrease in grid reliability and the increased operating costs. Given these constraints, this study concludes that a more practical upper limit for wind penetration is 10 percent. At 10 percent wind penetration, the CO2 emissions reduction due to wind is approximately 45g CO2 equivalent/kWh, or about 9 percent of total.



1 comment:

Michael Goggin said...

If you read the Reason Foundation's report, it actually says that wind energy can provide a large share of our electricity (at least 50%) and that wind's benefits are roughly as large as expected (9% reductions in pollution when we get 10% of our electricity from wind, 18% reductions at 20% wind, and 54% reductions at 50% wind). That's even after the report uses a seriously flawed methodology that overstates the challenges of integrating wind onto the grid and understates wind's benefits. For more, read the explanation here:
http://www.awea.org/blog/index.cfm?customel_dataPageID_1699=18996

Michael Goggin,
American Wind Energy Association