Tuesday, December 13, 2016

You Tube Moves Against Free Speech Videos : Videos Display Progressives Ideology

Who knew?? It seems every day more and more individuals and organizations that were once hidden are now coming out of the shadows to proclaim their distain and condemnation for any opposition to their agenda and ideology that guides them in making decisions.

That You Tube would make such a obviously ideologically biased decision regarding one of the most important aspects of our nation, the Constitutional right to free speech, whether written or spoken, is telling.

Still it's amazing and perplexing to understand that there are so many people that are willing to ignore other peoples right to express their opinion when it conflicts with their own view point. But it's dangerous to our nations as a rule of law when an organization like You Tube takes upon it's self to police others even when no rule or company ordnance is broken.

It's just that the opinion, and in this case videos that bring to light situations depicting how deceitful and immoral and if not dangerous to national security those depicted in the videos, let alone those in these videos seem to be capitulant with You Tube's ideology.

Be forewarned, now we know who is in charge of You Tube and what they intend.

YouTube Restricts PragerU Video of British Muslim Speaking About Anti-Semitism
Rachel del Guidice / /

YouTube is yet again restricting educational videos from a well-known conservative advocacy organization, PragerU. The latest video under restriction, “Born to Hate Jews,” was removed from YouTube Monday night but then later restored and placed under YouTube’s “restricted mode” after PragerU filed an official complaint. “YouTube has entirely removed PragerU’s new video with Kasim Hafeez, a British Muslim who is a pro-Israel activist,” PragerU announced Monday on its website.

The restricting of PragerU videos is no new development from YouTube, however.
In October, YouTube restricted 21 of PragerU’s educational videos. Some of the videos under restriction in October included “Are The Police Racist?,” “Why Don’t Feminists Fight for Muslim Women?,” “Why Did America Fight the Korean War?,” “Who’s More Pro-Choice: Europe or America?,” and “What ISIS Wants.”

 Watch the 21 PragerU Videos That YouTube Is Censoring

According to PragerU’s website, YouTube is now restricting 18 of its videos, which amounts to over 10 percent of its content. But the pro-Israel video was entirely removed.

In “Born to Hate Jews,” Hafeez discusses how he was indoctrinated with anti-Semitic views and raised to hate the Jewish people. “Within hours of the video’s release Monday morning, YouTube flagged it for ‘hate speech’ and took it down. PragerU is disputing YouTube’s removal of the video,” said an announcement on PragerU’s website. PragerU then filed a “formal complaint” to YouTube and Google. YouTube has since removed the “hate speech” flag and now lists the video under YouTube’s “restricted mode,” according to PragerU’s website.

Videos that fall under the “restricted” category, according to YouTube, contain vulgar language, violence and disturbing imagery, nudity and sexually suggestive content, and portrayal of harmful or dangerous activities. These age-restricted videos “are not visible to users who are logged out, are under 18 years of age, or have restricted mode enabled,” according to YouTube.

PragerU is asking viewers to sign a petition so that YouTube will restore access privileges to viewers as it says its content is neither inappropriate or offensive to minors or children. “Many families enable restricted mode in order to keep inappropriate and objectionable adult and sexual content away from their children—not to prevent them from watching animated, age-appropriate, educational videos,” according to PragerU’s website.

The Daily Signal contacted YouTube about the restrictions on “Born to Hate Jews” and YouTube responded saying that restricted videos are based on feedback from viewers and that sometimes videos are mistakenly flagged as restricted.

YouTube, however, did not wish to be directly quoted.

No comments: