Little wonder the bureaucrats spend a lot of sleepless nights trying to figure out how to get these expenditures coming back to Washington without the public knowing so they can steal as much of these monies as they can from the start, and then waste the rest on boondoggle projects in their respective state, all the while getting more money in the form of 'kick backs' from constituents.
This may be a little outside the envelope of reality, but given how our leaders have lied to us about everything else they do, why not about how our tax dollars are wasted? Who wouldn't believe they are stealing everything that isn't nailed down in Washington?
A Brief History of Tax Expenditures
Source: William McBride, "A Brief History of Tax Expenditures," Tax Foundation, August 22, 2013.
August 29, 2013
The concept of "tax expenditures" began in the 1960s when Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Stanley Surrey noted that many tax preferences resemble spending. Congress mandated in 1974 that these tax expenditures be recorded annually as part of the federal budget. Since the birth of the concept, tax expenditures have been defined as the deductions, credits, exclusions, exemptions and other tax preferences that represent departures from a "normal" tax code, says William McBride, chief economist at the Tax Foundation.
Attempts to reduce tax expenditures have not been met with great success.
As noted, tax expenditures represent departures from a "normal" tax code. Of course, therein lies the rub, since people disagree on what is normal. According to Treasury and the Joint Committee on Taxation, which are tasked with tracking tax expenditures each year, "normal" means the Haig-Simons comprehensive income tax, which taxes consumption plus changes in net wealth in a given time period.
In effect, the "normal" tax code is largely the tax code that existed in 1974, when the tax expenditure estimates were first mandated by Congress, but with an inconsistently broader tax base. While this is hardly a principled basis, these tax expenditure estimates have become the most widely accepted catalogue of "loopholes," mainly because the methodology has remained roughly the same since 1974 and it does capture many questionable items.
Attempts to reduce tax expenditures have not been met with great success.
- The Tax Reform Act of 1986 did not significantly reduce the number of tax expenditures, though it did reduce their real dollar value by about one-third.
- However, beginning in the mid- to late-1990s, numerous tax expenditures were added, expanded, or otherwise allowed to grow.
- Today, the tax expenditure budget is $1.2 trillion, which represents real dollar growth of 44 percent since 1986 and 96 percent growth since 1991 when tax expenditures were at their lowest.
As noted, tax expenditures represent departures from a "normal" tax code. Of course, therein lies the rub, since people disagree on what is normal. According to Treasury and the Joint Committee on Taxation, which are tasked with tracking tax expenditures each year, "normal" means the Haig-Simons comprehensive income tax, which taxes consumption plus changes in net wealth in a given time period.
In effect, the "normal" tax code is largely the tax code that existed in 1974, when the tax expenditure estimates were first mandated by Congress, but with an inconsistently broader tax base. While this is hardly a principled basis, these tax expenditure estimates have become the most widely accepted catalogue of "loopholes," mainly because the methodology has remained roughly the same since 1974 and it does capture many questionable items.
No comments:
Post a Comment