Secrets have Power

it's it something to watch the Society of Socialists Democrats deny that they took credit for the 'no' vote on the extension of the Patriot Act.

Harry Reid said in front of the Democratic caucus after the vote that " we killed the Patriot Act" and those assembled cheered.

Schumer said that they did not harm to the Patriot Act, they only got rid of some of the more offensive sections. He wants to make sure that he can not be held accountable for his action when we get hit again and thousands die because he didn't like some of the provisions in the bill.

Of course there are many that will keep tabs on him and others that voted to kill this safe guard of national security. It isn't like the old days when no matter what you said one day, it was gone or changed the next by the hacks in the lame-stream-media. There are literally thousands of people watching and listening to their every word, and then storing them away for later use.

Jamie Gorelick is a good example of how things that you say one day come back to haunt you when you lest expect or want them to. Gorelick, as deputy attorney general, supported a bill that installed an information wall between security agencies so they couldn't exchange information with one another. This is one of provisions that will die on January one, 2006, and the one that Schumer does not want to take responsibility for.

It was this wall that prevented our security people from knowing that terrorists were plotting to attack us. The CIA had information on several of the hijackers that flew the air liners into the Twin Towers but couldn't' give it to the FBI because they were bond by the law not to do so.

The Army had information as well on several members of Islamic terrorists groups that were related to the hijackers, and some of the actual hijackers, but couldn't tell anyone because of this wall that Gorelick put in place. The Army's program was called Abledanger, if you recall, which is even now being sorted out.

Gorelick's original intent was to prevent civil liberties from being abused by police agencies, but most authorities believe it does nothing but hinder law enforcement. Maybe that's what the Democrats had in mind.

I have read where some believe the wall was erected to prevent law enforcement agencies from tracing illegal campaign funds that were coming into the coffers of Bill Clinton from over seas and else where. That can't be proved as yet, but there is new information along these lines that is coming out soon about Slick Willy's turns and twists while in office.

I believe some of this new information has to do with Clinton's illegal use of the IRS, which fits his MO. Believe it or not, it is being blocked by members of congress. Democrats, of course. heh 'We don't want anything that will make our boy look bad or worse then he already does. It's not good for the party.'

Jamie was also involved in this scam that the socialists Democrats are trying to pull now with the NSA intercepts. Gorelick testified in congress, as deputy attorney general for Bubba, Bill Clinton, in 1994 where she stated that it was the desire of President, to investigate threats to our country, to have the ability to wire tap and kick in doors, on American citizens, without a court order. It was granted and Clinton used it hundreds of times. The FISA? No way! Right.

And who is front and center today on this rant that George Bush is abusing the powers of the Presidency spying on American citizens? The Democrats. Reid, Schumer, Boxer, Pelosi and the whole gang of cut throats on the left side of the aisle.

It's in the fourth amendment of the constitution of the United States. " Unjustified search and secure." This is justified by president. Bush also told the leaders of both parties what he was going to do shortly after 9/11 and they all agreed. He since then has notified them twelve more times that he was using this tactic to trace calls from the United States to hostel foreign countries. The Democrats said nothing. The all agreed.

The story that hit the streets was released by that poor, back sliding, misdirected Marxist rag, the New York Times. Remember the whore for the Democrat National committee? This time she has really stepped in it -

The Times sat on this story for a year, knowing that it was classified information and that it is illegal to publish under any circumstances. How they got it is a mystery. It seems that it is just one more top secret that has been leaked to the Times from someone in congress or some top security agency. But this time, there will be an investigation. The attorney general is getting together a team, hopefully a grand jury, to bring in the reporters and management of the New York Times to testify as to their sources.

Another reason that the Times is releasing this story now is a reporter, Risen, that works for the paper, has a book coming out on this subject shortly. They knowing risk national security just to get some political advantage. Again, the Democrats will use any tool at their command to gain power.

It's always amazing that when a Democrat using the power of Presidency to investigate citizens of this country, it is never a problem. It doesn't seem possible that Bill Clinton used this information gathering technique to stop foreign agents from attacking our country. Bill Clinton never did anything to stop terrorists from attack us. So who did he investigate?

Hmmmmmm !