More information on the ''Deep State'' and what they all intend for us. First it was the FBI and the DOJ, and to some extent the Department of State, now it's the CIA as well that has joined in on the attack on our President and our Constitution.
Never believe that this is only the leaders of our intel community, this is from the top down, the system is riddled with willing warriors ready to take power when called on to do so.
Remember Eric Holder at the DOJ for 8 years? Barrrack's ''Wingman" in all things criminal? Imagine how many people he installed through out the government to bring to bear the implementation of the ''Fundamental change'' to civil society that Barrrack promised back in 2008?
The attack on President Trump is for real now and out in the open for all to see. No more hiding in the shadows and being called a ''Shadow Government'' but a real second unelected bunch of criminals in nearly all agencies and government departments that seek total power for personal reasons.
The war is on and these people are serious and focused. To deny this on our part as law abiding citizens will find ourselves kneeing.
The question that still remains now is has the intel community really become enemies of the people?
This Week’s Media Take — “The CIA Democrats” Drive the Impeachment Bus
You’ve seen the headlines about impeachment proceedings against President Trump. You’ve probably not seen how the hand of the so-called “Deep State” made it happen.
The “Deep State” is not some sort of conspiracy theory, by the way. Nor is it an invention of Donald Trump. It’s a shorthand name for the permanent bureaucracy that inhabits the D.C. swamp, especially in the realm of intelligence and national security. Former Congressional aide Mike Lofgren used the term in a 2011 essay at the Truthout website and expanded on it in his 2016 book, The Deep State: The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government.
Anyway, the impeachment bus has been slow-moving — until now. Democrats have latched onto “Ukraine-gate” in the expectation it will catch on in a way Russiagate never did. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, reluctant for most of this year to pursue impeachment, is now “all in.”
Gerald Seib, executive Washington editor at The Wall Street Journal, says everything changed less than 72 hours ago.
The dam of resistance to impeachment appeared to break fully and finally Monday night with the online publication of an op-ed in the Washington Post by seven House Democratic freshman members calling for an impeachment process to begin. All seven of the authors formerly served in the military or national-security agencies. All are political moderates. All come from swing districts; indeed, Mr. Trump won the vote in four of the seven districts in the 2016 presidential campaign. [Emphasis mine]
This group of seven freshman congress members belongs to a group that writer Patrick Martin labels “the CIA Democrats.”
Martin first noticed this group coming up through the ranks during primary season in 2018.
In a thoroughly-researched series of articles for the World Socialist Web Site — you never know where you’ll find quality news analysis! — Martin noticed an unusually high number of Democrats with military or intelligence backgrounds running for the U.S. House in competitive districts.
By his count, such candidates ran in 46 toss-up districts. Thirty of them won their primary contests. Eleven of them won in the general election that gave Democrats control of the House. And seven signed their names to the Washington Post Op-Ed on Monday — a critical mass without which impeachment would still be a topic confined to the Democratic Party’s fringes.
Martin is scrupulous about not jumping to conclusions. Nowhere does he allege the “Deep State” purposely orchestrated a campaign of ex-spooks and soldiers pursuing House seats in swing districts with an eye toward impeachment. But the phenomenon is nonetheless striking, as he wrote in a follow-up article after the November election.
The influx of new members of Congress with recent experience in the CIA or military or civilian national security positions is unprecedented for the Democratic Party in the more than four decades since the Vietnam War era. The 11 include seven military veterans, all but one an officer—two each from the Army, Navy and Marines, one from the Air Force—two former CIA agents, and two who worked as civilian decision-makers in the State Department and National Security Council.
Five of the 11 are women, including the two who are ex-CIA. Both of them — Michigan’s Elissa Slotkin and Virginia’s Abigail Spanberger — signed the Op-Ed. Both have been revered in Big Media articles as the “badass women” of the freshman class.
These Deep State insiders don’t get as much press as “the Squad” — the hard-left faction led by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — but they’re the ones exercising outsized influence as the D.C. swamp careens toward impeachment.
With that, let’s turn it over to Alan with a top-to-bottom review of the open positions in the Profit Wire portfolio.
In pursuit of the real story,
Never believe that this is only the leaders of our intel community, this is from the top down, the system is riddled with willing warriors ready to take power when called on to do so.
Remember Eric Holder at the DOJ for 8 years? Barrrack's ''Wingman" in all things criminal? Imagine how many people he installed through out the government to bring to bear the implementation of the ''Fundamental change'' to civil society that Barrrack promised back in 2008?
The attack on President Trump is for real now and out in the open for all to see. No more hiding in the shadows and being called a ''Shadow Government'' but a real second unelected bunch of criminals in nearly all agencies and government departments that seek total power for personal reasons.
The war is on and these people are serious and focused. To deny this on our part as law abiding citizens will find ourselves kneeing.
The question that still remains now is has the intel community really become enemies of the people?
This Week’s Media Take — “The CIA Democrats” Drive the Impeachment Bus
You’ve seen the headlines about impeachment proceedings against President Trump. You’ve probably not seen how the hand of the so-called “Deep State” made it happen.
The “Deep State” is not some sort of conspiracy theory, by the way. Nor is it an invention of Donald Trump. It’s a shorthand name for the permanent bureaucracy that inhabits the D.C. swamp, especially in the realm of intelligence and national security. Former Congressional aide Mike Lofgren used the term in a 2011 essay at the Truthout website and expanded on it in his 2016 book, The Deep State: The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government.
Anyway, the impeachment bus has been slow-moving — until now. Democrats have latched onto “Ukraine-gate” in the expectation it will catch on in a way Russiagate never did. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, reluctant for most of this year to pursue impeachment, is now “all in.”
Gerald Seib, executive Washington editor at The Wall Street Journal, says everything changed less than 72 hours ago.
The dam of resistance to impeachment appeared to break fully and finally Monday night with the online publication of an op-ed in the Washington Post by seven House Democratic freshman members calling for an impeachment process to begin. All seven of the authors formerly served in the military or national-security agencies. All are political moderates. All come from swing districts; indeed, Mr. Trump won the vote in four of the seven districts in the 2016 presidential campaign. [Emphasis mine]
This group of seven freshman congress members belongs to a group that writer Patrick Martin labels “the CIA Democrats.”
Martin first noticed this group coming up through the ranks during primary season in 2018.
In a thoroughly-researched series of articles for the World Socialist Web Site — you never know where you’ll find quality news analysis! — Martin noticed an unusually high number of Democrats with military or intelligence backgrounds running for the U.S. House in competitive districts.
By his count, such candidates ran in 46 toss-up districts. Thirty of them won their primary contests. Eleven of them won in the general election that gave Democrats control of the House. And seven signed their names to the Washington Post Op-Ed on Monday — a critical mass without which impeachment would still be a topic confined to the Democratic Party’s fringes.
Martin is scrupulous about not jumping to conclusions. Nowhere does he allege the “Deep State” purposely orchestrated a campaign of ex-spooks and soldiers pursuing House seats in swing districts with an eye toward impeachment. But the phenomenon is nonetheless striking, as he wrote in a follow-up article after the November election.
The influx of new members of Congress with recent experience in the CIA or military or civilian national security positions is unprecedented for the Democratic Party in the more than four decades since the Vietnam War era. The 11 include seven military veterans, all but one an officer—two each from the Army, Navy and Marines, one from the Air Force—two former CIA agents, and two who worked as civilian decision-makers in the State Department and National Security Council.
Five of the 11 are women, including the two who are ex-CIA. Both of them — Michigan’s Elissa Slotkin and Virginia’s Abigail Spanberger — signed the Op-Ed. Both have been revered in Big Media articles as the “badass women” of the freshman class.
These Deep State insiders don’t get as much press as “the Squad” — the hard-left faction led by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — but they’re the ones exercising outsized influence as the D.C. swamp careens toward impeachment.
With that, let’s turn it over to Alan with a top-to-bottom review of the open positions in the Profit Wire portfolio.
In pursuit of the real story,
No comments:
Post a Comment