Thursday, March 10, 2016

Progressive's Fuel Standards Costs Consumers : Regulate To Destruction

As more and more government regulations demanding more from all industry to accommodate the 'changes', the result of course will be more technology to meet the over regulation, as a result of the insane few that believes climate change will kill us all if we don't stop the increase of CO2, especially from the burning of gasoline.

The Left’s Fuel Economy Regulations Could Cost You $3,800
David Kreutzer / / Salim Furth / /     

As Michigan voters head to the polls on Tuesday, they should ask candidates whether they will leave in place costly regulations that have added thousands to the price of new cars and depressed sales for the state’s iconic industry.
fuelstandards

Federal regulations that force ever-increasing automobile fuel economy standards cost consumers thousands of dollars more than what they save on using less gas. These burdensome regulations also reduce new car purchases and, therefore, auto worker employment. 
To Read the Full Heritage Foundation Report, Fuel Economy Standards Are a Costly Mistake.

How much more expensive are the gas mileage gains?
Scholars estimated that the new standards would add at least $3,800 to the cost of a car in 2016 and at least $7,200 in 2025. This cost includes the gasoline savings. Empirical Heritage Foundation research supports those estimates. You get only what you pay for, and you have to pay for what you get.
Getting cars to meet the tighter efficiency standards means deploying expensive technology instead of using cost-effective engineering. High prices are bad for consumers and bad for auto workers. At higher prices, consumers demand fewer vehicles, and automakers hire fewer workers.

Thus, fewer U.S. auto workers are employed now than in 2007 despite a drop in wages. Although the regulations may not hurt many corporations as much (because they can lay off workers and pass higher costs on to consumers), consumers and auto workers have been the lab rats of this failed environmentalist experiment.

No comments: