Global Warmers Demand Consensus Is Enough : Science Is Not Consensus!

The bottom line in scientific research is there cannot be any consensus in science, only facts that can be proven by collected data and analysis. If the facts in a case are just 'belief or theory' based on computer models that have been proven wrong, then the case in question can only be judged as speculation, and speculation is not science.

Global warming due to the influence of man-made interference with mother nature is hyperbole with the intent to install fear in people that are not paying attention, and there fore easy marks to gain an advantage and access to tax revenues for more 'research'.

Believe, money is the 'mothers milk' of politics and research. Some research is founded on legitimate  claims for the public good and can show positive results, but in many cases like global warming or man-made climate change, their basis for demanding support is based on fear and intimidation.

Need more evidence? How many decades have the 'warmers' demanded if we don't pay for more research we will all be dead by end of the decade? Why aren't we all dead and why hasn't anything changed from the way it was 30 years ago?

Is There Really a 97 Percent Consensus on Global Warming?
Source: Michael Stroup, "The Big Lie of the "Consensus View" on Global Warming," Energy and Environment: Clearing the Air Blog, National Center for Policy Analysis, July 30, 2014.

August 1, 2014

Climate change proponents routinely cite the "scientific consensus" that surrounds anthropogenic (human-caused) global warming. But NCPA Senior Fellow Michael Stroup explains where that "scientific consensus" comes from and why the numbers are unreliable.

In 2013, a group of scientists published a study in Environmental Research Letters entitled, "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature." The study reviewed the abstracts of 11,944 scientific papers dealing with global warming and climate change. According to climate change activists, the study is proof that 97 percent of scientists in the climate research community agree that global warming is human-caused.

Except, explains Stroup, that the study did not make that conclusion. In fact:

• The study examined more than 11,944 peer-reviewed articles published from 1991 to 2011.
• The researchers tracked which studies stated an opinion on human-caused global warming and which did not. Of those that did state an opinion, the researchers determined whether the reports supported, rejected or were uncertain about the cause of global warming.
• Of the studies examined, 66.4 percent of the abstracts expressed no position whatsoever on human-caused global warming.
• Of the abstracts that did express an opinion on human-caused warming, 97.1 percent endorsed the notion that it was human-caused.

Stroup likens the 97 percent claim to a survey of 10,000 ice cream lovers. Imagine a survey that asked respondents what their preferred ice cream brand was, but more than half of those surveyed do not respond to the question. If 97 percent of those who did respond to the question report that their favorite ice cream is Haagen Dazs, asks Stroup, is that proof that all ice cream lovers support the consensus view that Haagen Dazs is the best ice cream?

Stroup cautions policymakers to engage in logical analysis when crafting environmental policies, not spin misleading statistics.