Global warming or climate change alarmists are not about the weather and how the changes in temperature effect our all our lives, it about the money and the power to control outcomes by an elite few. Do they really believe global warming is based on science or is it a religion based only on faith. Worse, are they just clever and ambitious criminals.
The truth is, the alarmists have proven to be con-men, leaving a trail of misinformation and out right lies on man- made temperature changes that have not occurred but non-the-less still demand more tax dollars to prove an increasingly skeptical public that it is really happening.
This is insane - in the face of over whelming evidence to the contrary, the insane deny reality. The indisputable evidence over the last several decades proves them wrong, yet the beat goes on unabated. Witness the lunatics in the senate on last Tuesday night, bloviating for hours on the coming catastrophe.
What happened to common sense? What happened to reality? Who are these people? Where do they come from? Who voted for them?
Stop Basing Climate Policy on Invalid Models
Source: Paul Ballonoff, "A Fresh Look at Climate Change," Cato Institute, Winter 2014.
March 11, 2014
It is time to stop basing national policy on climate models that have proven themselves wrong again and again, says Paul Ballonoff, an independent consultant in international energy development.
Our current climate policy is based on models that produce global warming forecasts. Unfortunately, those forecasts have been wildly incorrect from what we have actually observed. If those forecasts are not accurate, we need to reconsider the policies that were based on them.
If humans can find ways to regulate the global temperature, he says, that would be quite advancement. But those in the climate change community have only created mistrust for the use of science in making policy determinations. Models, forecasts and predictions are only valuable or worthwhile if they actually work. Models alone are not science, and they are wildly deceptive foundations on which to base energy policy.
By failing to compare their forecasts to subsequent actual events, the climate science community has simply produced false predictions and abused "science" for political purposes.
Our current climate policy is based on models that produce global warming forecasts. Unfortunately, those forecasts have been wildly incorrect from what we have actually observed. If those forecasts are not accurate, we need to reconsider the policies that were based on them.
- After 25 years of cooling after World War II, temperatures increased at a strong rate in the quarter century ending in 1997.
- That same year, the United Nations issued its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change analysis, on which most of our climate policy today is based, despite that it was the last year in which a global average temperature rise occurred.
If humans can find ways to regulate the global temperature, he says, that would be quite advancement. But those in the climate change community have only created mistrust for the use of science in making policy determinations. Models, forecasts and predictions are only valuable or worthwhile if they actually work. Models alone are not science, and they are wildly deceptive foundations on which to base energy policy.
By failing to compare their forecasts to subsequent actual events, the climate science community has simply produced false predictions and abused "science" for political purposes.
No comments:
Post a Comment