The fact that there is no 'man-made global warming' is of little interest, what is important is making the case for 'man-made warming' so billions of tax dollars can be drained from the national treasury into the pockets of the warmers, and thereby gain power and control over the population with continued reports of disaster if the money stops coming in for more research.
The worst part of all this is a majority of the world population is to slow or stupid to see the lie even in the face of researchers that were shown to have falsified their graphs and findings to make their point.
Remember the 'Hockey Stick' graph that started the whole mess? A lie! Researchers in England changed the figures to match their desired outcomes. Remember the emails between the researchers that were posted for all to see how they could make the facts match their claims so they decided to change the figures to match outcomes?
Remember Dan Rather reporting on George Bush's National Guard service? Case in point - He knew it wasn't true but he believed it 'should be', so he went ahead and reported it as true. He, like all of his colleagues in the main stream press, believe it's the 'seriousness of the charge' that is most important, not the facts that make the headlines and change peoples thinking.
It always worked well in the past to change the story line momentum to meet the progressive socialist Democrat agenda, but the Internet brought new light to progressive tactics of story telling.
And so it has also for the global warmers and the climate changers.
The Benefits of Climate Change
Source: Matt Ridley, "Why Climate Change Is Good for the World," The Spectator (U.K.), October 19, 2013.
October 25, 2013
Climate change has done more good than harm so far and is likely to continue doing so for most of this century. This is not a right-wing fantasy; it is the consensus of expert opinion. Yet almost nobody seems to know this, says British scientist and journalist Matt Ridley.
Even polar bears are thriving so far. It's worth noting that the three years with the lowest polar bear cub survival in the western Hudson Bay (1974, 1984 and 1992) were the years when the sea ice was too thick for ringed seals to appear in good numbers in spring. Bears need broken ice.
Building wind turbines, growing biofuels and substituting wood for coal in power stations -- all policies designed explicitly to fight climate change -- have had negligible effects on carbon dioxide emissions. But they have driven people into fuel poverty, made industries uncompetitive, driven up food prices, accelerated the destruction of forests, killed rare birds of prey, and divided communities.
So we are doing real harm now to impede a change that will produce net benefits for 70 years.
- The chief benefits of global warming include: fewer winter deaths; lower energy costs; better agricultural yields; probably fewer droughts; maybe richer biodiversity.
- It is a little-known fact that winter deaths exceed summer deaths.
- Overall, Tol finds that climate change in the past century improved human welfare.
- He calculates the improvement has been 1.4 percent of global economic output, rising to 1.5 percent by 2025.
- For some people, this means the difference between survival and starvation.
Even polar bears are thriving so far. It's worth noting that the three years with the lowest polar bear cub survival in the western Hudson Bay (1974, 1984 and 1992) were the years when the sea ice was too thick for ringed seals to appear in good numbers in spring. Bears need broken ice.
Building wind turbines, growing biofuels and substituting wood for coal in power stations -- all policies designed explicitly to fight climate change -- have had negligible effects on carbon dioxide emissions. But they have driven people into fuel poverty, made industries uncompetitive, driven up food prices, accelerated the destruction of forests, killed rare birds of prey, and divided communities.
So we are doing real harm now to impede a change that will produce net benefits for 70 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment