Government Corruption Is Total? Who Will Stand Up?

I believe most of us knew the government was a mess, but to the extent that we find it now, given all of the criminal activity among appointees and others, comes as an eye opener. With this dawning of reality comes fear and anger that we can not trust any member of the establishment to do the job that is required of them in a Democratic, law based government.

Our present officials that are in control of all aspects of our lives, mostly unelected officials but many elected as well, has shown themselves to be corrupt, forcing the citizens of this great country to become enemies of the state.

What comes next remains to be seen. Will the people step up and say enough is enough, or will they find this too difficult and acquiesce, I fear the latter.

(The American Thinker)
Bipartisan Tango and Lawless Justice
By Clarice Feldman


Two things caught my attention this week: first, the ridiculous way Democrat partisans, erroneously appointed by President George W. Bush to government positions from which they exercised their power, to undercut Republicans are by reason of the Bush appointment tagged "bipartisan" by the media.
Secondly, the widespread ignorance of the Bill of Rights and their obligations by oath to obey the Constitution by government lawyers in Washington and at the state level.

Bipartisan Tango
Two "bipartisan" exemplars are James Comey, whom President Obama nominated this week to head the FBI and Douglas Shulman, whom Bush had appointed to head the IRS and under whom that agency began a partisan attack on Obama opponents.
James Comey, as you may recall, came to Washington from the U.S. Attorney's office in New York, where he made his name by successfully prosecuting Martha Stewart. His selection is praised this week by the New York Times as proof of Obama's bipartisanship. Those of us who, like Thomas Maguire, have a better sense of history, remember Comey otherwise as a fiercely partisan anti-Cheney force.

The Times reminded readers that Comey refused to authorize warrantless wiretaps.
The Washington Post also referred readers to the hospital room confrontation pitting White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales and Andrew Card, Bush's chief of staff, against Comey over waterboarding. It also reminded readers of Comey's role in selecting his former colleague Patrick Fitzgerald to conduct a special investigation into who leaked the name of CIA officer Valerie Plame, which led to the conviction of Vice-President Cheney's aide, Scooter Libby (not for the leak but for remembering something different than perhaps Tim Russert did.)
Like Thomas Maguire, I remember Comey's role as more partisan than heroic:

Which leads to my perspective -- a Republican group was pushing back on a number of fronts against Dick Cheney's aggressive view of Executive power and the best way to fight the war on terror. Warrantless surveillance and enhanced interrogation were two disputed areas. The Plame "investigation" was never a serious attempt to find out who may have leaked information about Valerie Plame (hence the cursory non-investigation of Armitage and Powell at State and the utter pass given to NBC's Russert, Mitchell and Gregory) -- the focus was on bringing down Scooter Libby and Dick Cheney.

Just to review the timing -- Jack Goldsmith took over the Office of Legal Counsel in October 2003 and promptly raised questions about enhanced interrogation and warrantless wiretapping. He tried without success during the fall of 2003 to get James Comey, then a Deputy AG, read into the surveillance program. On Dec 30, 2003 Ashcroft recuses himself from the Plame investigation and Comey appoints Special Counsel Fitzgerald. A month later, Comey was read into the surveillance program, and by March we had the famous hospital showdown.
Cheney had made a lot of enemies, not all of whom were on Team Blue.

The Commissioner is In (the White) House
Much is made of the fact that former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman, now at Brookings, a Democratic think tank, was also a Bush appointment and therefore, it is supposed, readers should ignore the outrageous partisan activities of the agency instituted under his watch. Shulman not only had been a Democratic political contributor, but his wife is a senior program advisor for Public Campaign, which describes itself as an "organization dedicated to sweeping campaign reform that aims to reduce the role of big special interest money in American politics."
In case you've been sleeping or your name is John McCain, "special interests" are not defined in the press or "public interest" world as unions, George Soros, or the Rockefeller Foundation -- they are farmers, small businessmen, anti-abortion groups, and the NRA. In other words, just as Shulman turned the IRS into an arm of the Democratic Party, his wife was plowing the same field from outside the government.

How bipartisan could Shulman have been when he spent somewhere in excess of 150 days visiting the White House during his term?
And how hand in glove was the harassment aimed at the conservative grassroots, and why is Comey's appointment of concern? Because the IRS obviously coordinated it with other government agencies.
This matryoshka doll of a scandal just keeps on opening up. How many figures will be scattered around when it's all over?


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/06/bipartisan_tango_and_lawless_justice.html#ixzz2V3tXNW20
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook