Friday, May 30, 2008

Lieberman/Warner Bill Will Crush American Taxpayers

There is a lot of important things happening this coming week in Washington and they all seem to be directed at cause harm rather than being helpful to the American population.

I never know what to think about the logic that our legislators use when deciding what is the best course of action when voting. The fact that this bill was even contemplated as make me think they have absolutely no common sense at all.

The Lieberman/Warner bill on global warming is based on a fraudulent information provided by individuals that have an agenda that doesn't include the well being of the American citizen. The information that they use is based on junk science, that is science without hard evidence found from legitimate real time research.

Did you ever wonder why Al Gore refuses to debat 'man made' global warming?

Take a few minutes and look how this bill will effect your state which means how it will effect your family now and in the future.

This is serious stuff and it is happening right now. It will effect you now, and It will effect everything you do or ever wanted to do.

Call your representative and ask them to vote this down. Now you know the battle is joined so you can keep the faith.


From the Heritage Foundation -
May 22, 2008

Effect of the Lieberman-Warner Global Warming Legislation on States
by William W. Beach, Ben Lieberman, David Kreutzer, Ph.D. and Nick Loris
WebMemo #1930

The Senate's leading climate-change bill, while aiming to combat global warming by reducing carbon dioxide in the air, actually poses "extraordinary perils" for Americans and the economy, according to a new study from The Heritage Foundation.

The study, produced by Heritage's Center for Data Analysis (CDA), forecasts severe consequences—including crushing energy costs, millions of jobs lost and falling household income—if Congress enacts the so-called Lieberman-Warner bill.

What follows are 50 state-by-state breakouts of the impact the bill would have on jobs and the economy.

Alabama (chart)
Alaska (chart)
Missouri (chart)
Montana (chart)
Nebraska (chart)
Nevada (chart)
New Hampshire (chart)
New Jersey (chart)
New Mexico (chart)
New York (chart)
North Carolina (chart)
North Dakota (chart)
Ohio (chart)
Oklahoma (chart)
Oregon (chart)
Pennsylvania (chart)
Rhode Island (chart)
South Carolina (chart)
South Dakota (chart)
Tennessee (chart)
Texas (chart)
Utah (chart)
Vermont (chart)
Virginia (chart)
Washington (chart)
West Virginia (chart)
Wisconsin (chart)
Wyoming (chart)

Arizona (chart)
Arkansas (chart)
California (chart)
Colorado (chart)
Connecticut (chart)
Delaware (chart)
Florida (chart)
Georgia (chart)
Hawaii (chart)
Idaho (chart)
Illinois (chart)
Indiana (chart)
Iowa (chart)
Kansas (chart)
Kentucky (chart)
Louisiana (chart)
Maine (chart)
Maryland (chart)
Massachusetts (chart)
Michigan (chart)
Minnesota (chart)
Mississippi (chart)

How Lieberman-Warner Would Affect the Price of Gasoline (chart)

No comments: