Monday, June 22, 2015

Politics And Fossil Energy : Russia Moves Ahead, Again


 
   
Oh wait, do you think Mr Obama believes that making sure the rest of the world will not have a chance at prosperity by stopping natural gas exports from America, the leader in natural gas, and supports a tyrant like Russia when ever he can. Why is the middle east on fire? Why is he so supportive of the Iranian nuke deal? Wonder no longer.

I wonder who's side is he on? I think we know.

Even better, remember his buddy Hugo Chavez, the communist leader, now dead from Venezuela? And now his outreach to Cuba's Castro, a communist, that at this time is attacking and arresting its citizens have the audacity to want freedom?

Why does Mr Obama seem to like tyrants so much?

Political Versus Market Energy Economics
Source: Santiago Bello, "Political Versus Market Energy Economics," National Center for Policy Analysis, June 15, 2015.

June 18, 2015

With news of a consensus on its financing structure, details of a proposed natural gas pipeline called the Turkish Stream are expected to be finalized as early as June 18th. The pipeline, which is estimated by internal sources to cost over $2 billion, will originate in Russia, pass through Turkey and end in Greece. The move seems very strategic of Russia — one of the largest exporters of gas in the world — which has shown interest in the financial backing of Greece's new leadership under leftist hardliners, says NCPA research associate Santiago Bello.

The U.S. Department of State (DOS) warned that expanding Europe's dependence on Russian gas would only increase political instability in the region and could reduce price competitiveness of natural gas in Europe, however members of Greece's ruling party, Syriza, quickly rebuked the observations and labeled them as attempted blackmail. Members of the DOS even went so far as to say that Turkish Stream in itself is not an economic investment, and there are perhaps a few reasons to believe so:
  • The offshore portion of Turkish Stream completely circumvents other European countries in almost a comical fashion given the alternative price of simply building land-based pipelines through Ukraine… this costly act of political angst immediately made the marine portion of the pipeline $600 million more expensive;
  • According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Russian gas has been losing market share with almost every passing year for over ten years, while European demand for gas has fallen and stagnated, no doubt due to Europe's lethargic growth numbers:
At the aggregate level, natural gas is an extremely profitable energy resource, which is seeing double-digit growth across many different countries, mainly in the developing world. However, mature economies such as those in Europe have not characterized themselves as extremely profitable or high-growth markets, meaning that they are among the least likely areas to see attractive returns on expensive fossil energy infrastructure projects like Turkish Stream.
 



No comments: