Teacher Tenure on Trial
Source: Adrienne Lu, "Teacher Tenure and Dismissal on Trial," Stateline, April 1, 2014.
April 3, 2014
Last week marked the end of a two-month-long trial in California in response to a lawsuit filed by the nonprofit group Students Matter on behalf of nine public school students, says Stateline.
Eric Lerum, vice president of national policy for Students First, a student advocacy group, says that California's personnel policies are antiquated. "If we know what the importance and impact of a teacher is, we should be putting policies in place that allow us to get the best teachers in front of as many kids as possible."
- California's tenure laws are incredibly generous toward teachers.
- After just 18 months on the job, teachers can be given permanent employment status, and firings are mainly based on seniority, not performance.
- The plaintiffs charge that these tenure and layoff rules are hurting students: the rules leave so many ineffective teachers in classrooms that students -- often low-income and minority students -- do not receive the education guaranteed them by the state constitution.
- It is the first lawsuit to charge that personnel policies are responsible for denying equal education opportunities.
- North Carolina and South Dakota have ended their tenure systems, and Arizona has made firing poorly performing teachers an easier task.
- Similarly, Connecticut has made it easier for schools to decline to renew teacher contracts.
- Some districts have experimented with performance pay, and other states are linking tenure with teacher evaluations.
Eric Lerum, vice president of national policy for Students First, a student advocacy group, says that California's personnel policies are antiquated. "If we know what the importance and impact of a teacher is, we should be putting policies in place that allow us to get the best teachers in front of as many kids as possible."
No comments:
Post a Comment