Education Pilot Program : Electronic ID Tags

Okay, you decide what this is all about - but from my perspective, it's governmental control of the children, where they go and what they do as well as what they learn. But it's not just their location in school, but it's bringing them under the influence of a small group of people that believe they are smarter then the rest of us and know what's best.

As parents, be on guard against all such mind and body control. Universities are already totally under the influence of agendas that want to "fundamentally" change our way of life. This kind of this is only the beginning for K through 12 schools.

Those of us who are old enough remember how this was used a few decades ago and how the out come was catastrophic.

Mark of the Beast
(author unknown)
"You have to take the Mark of the Beast," Steve Hernandez said during a protest outside his daughter's school. "This is just indoctrination of this. This is not the Mark of the Beast, but this is how it starts."


As an update to the "War on You" file, we originally made a mention in mid-October of two schools in San Antonio introducing "optionally mandatory" photo ID cards with RFID tracking chips for all students.

Andrea Hernandez of Northside Independent School District (NISD) refused to wear the ID badge, citing religious reasons. In response, the school suspended her to other non-RFID schools in the district until she was willing to comply.

"There is something fundamentally disturbing about this school district's insistence on steamrolling students into complying with programs that have nothing whatsoever to do with academic priorities and everything to do with fattening school coffers," said John Whitehead of Rutherford Institute in an interview with Wired.

Whitehead, Andrea's outspoken attorney, says the school has no legal grounds to make Andrea wear the Smart ID and is leading the case against the RFID tags.

Apparently, this case doesn't concern just Mr. Whitehead and his client...
"We've gotten so much press attention around the country," Mr. Whitehead said, "the whole country's watching this. "This is the pilot program and the pilot case, so it's very important."

And since Andrea's suspension, the school has caught a lot of heat about the true intentions of the program. "These 'student locator' programs," says Whitehead, "are ultimately aimed at getting students used to living in a total surveillance state where there will be no privacy, and wherever you go and whatever you text or email with be watched by the government."

The schools aren't "putting these chips on to protect kids," Whitehead argues. "They're doing it to make money."

To the dismay of the school's coffer holders, it seems the courts agree. Last week, a judge made a temporary restraining order against the school permanent, overruling their decision and allowing Hernandez to return to school RFID-free.

"Usually, when judges rule on temporary restraining orders in your favor, that's how they're leaning," Whitehead explains. "It would take quite a bit of some kind of evidence on constitutional arguments, which the school does not have."

The judge's final ruling is expected to be released tomorrow. Alas a victory for Hernandez will only slow, not stop, the advance of an American police state. Consider a few defensive measures here.