What does it say about our society when we allow mass killers to enter our legal systems as equals to our own citizens? What also does it say about us when our own high court decides they have rights and benefits that many of our own citizens don't have or can't afford?
We're not talking about disadvantaged peoples or the poor that pour into our country for medical treatment and or just a way to not starve to death - we are talking about people that want to kills all and have tried to do just that on the battle field. These are people that have dedicated their lives to killing anyone that disagrees with their way of life - they have a philosophy of death to all nonbelievers.
A large majority of Americans know the difference between right and wrong and live their personal lives under laws that were established two thousand years ago. This fantastic country was founded under those same laws and has become the most powerful and free country in the world and in all history.
How can five people decide for me and you what is right and what is wrong? That is what the five liberal Supreme Court justices have done granting terrorists rights and benefits that hundreds of thousands have died to preserve for us over the years since our founding. Now they have decreed that anyone that wants to kills all of us and fails in their task, is captured will get a free ride back to freedom and another chance to kill us again.
Where is the common sense in this? Who in their right mind would allow this to happen? What law maker could possibility believe the founding fathers had this in mind when they wrote the Constitution?
Well, actually this should be easy enough to answer - the United State Senate and the Supreme Court has very few members that have their right mind. Their complete lack of responsibility to the American people and to the Constitution precepts is made evident every time they open their individual or collective mouths.
They embarrass us all and they desecrate all those that gave their lives for this country.
Keep the faith while we attack this ignorance and duplicity among our anointed royalty - then we will know how to advance the battle for Freedom and Democracy.
DON'T CATCH - KILL
By RALPH PETERS
June 24, 2008 --
THE first beneficiary of Bar ack Obama's promise to expand health-care access could be Osama bin Laden.
The senator would rather see Osama captured, not killed, then put into our federal system for trial. That means the terror master would get better medical treatment - for free - than many Post readers can afford.Is that 'really' what Americans want? To spend millions of dollars protecting a captive bin Laden and millions more treating his kidney problems?Is 'that' an effective reply to 9/11? Does it pass 'any' common-sense test?
Recent events should have made it clear - again - that captive terrorists are overwhelmingly a liability. The meager intelligence we get interrogating them is rarely commensurate with the array of financial, moral and legal costs involved in keeping them locked up. Worst of all (as I've repeatedly argued), a jailed terrorist, not a dead one, is the true "martyr."
Incarcerated terrorists become celebrated causes for our domestic left and rallying points for foreign fanatics. The dead just rot.
A few weeks ago, a well-planned terrorist assault on a prison in Kandahar, Afghanistan, freed dozens of Taliban midlevel managers and perhaps 200 terrorist foot soldiers. What benefit had we gained by taking these butchers prisoner instead of killing them on the battlefield? They merely lived to fight another day.
Almost simultaneously, our Supreme Court ruled that terrorists who slaughter Americans should enjoy legal protections meant for US citizens. I respect and admire the Supremes, but this decision drives home the truism that "Only God is perfect."
A dead terrorist is a good terrorist.
Keeps costs down, too.To be clear: I do not advocate executing prisoners. We should treat any terrorist we capture rigorously, but with basic decency. I would only condone forceful interrogation methods in the most exceptional cases (there are always exceptions in real life, once you leave the rarefied air of the law library or the campus).
But it 'is' my belief that our conventional military and special-operations efforts should emphasize killing terrorists on the battlefield or in their lairs - conditions where it is entirely legal to do so. Taking these murderers prisoner should be an accident, not a goal. Once a terrorist raises his hands in surrender, we must honor the pertinent conventions. But effective military and intelligence operations shouldn't give him the chance to wave a white rag.
Certainly, we should do all we sensibly can to avoid harming the innocent. Effective targeting demands sound intelligence work (ours has gotten much better). And, once in a great while, we'll decide that a senior terrorist 'should' be taken alive for interrogation. But the left-wing arguments against killing those who do all they can to kill us are simply wrong. You 'can' kill your way out of terrorist challenges - it's been done countless times through the centuries. (That's what's happening to Al Qaeda in Iraq today.)
And killing terrorists doesn't put us on a "slippery slope." Killing Osama or Ayman al-Zawahiri wouldn't inevitably mean that our Special Forces would then turn to assassinating Iowa aldermen or Alabama church deacons.
The greatest left-wing fallacy in the War on Terror is the conviction that protecting the rights of terrorists is more important than protecting the rights of the innocent. It is utterly wrong to imagine that, by according exaggerated legal protections to terrorists, we strengthen the legal basis of our society.
Our government's basic justification for existing is the protection of its own citizens.There is nothing heroic or noble about defending a fanatical mass murderer's "rights." The nobility lies in protecting the masses of innocent human beings who obey the law. When anyone chooses the path of terror, he or she leaps beyond all constitutional guarantees.
Over and over again, our military has found that escaped or released terrorist prisoners kill again. And hard-core terrorists can't be rehabilitated:
The redemption of human monsters is a myth.
No terrorist captured abroad should ever set foot on American soil. No terrorist taken overseas should ever enter a US courtroom. And no terrorist of any kind should ever receive free health care that working Americans can't afford for their families.No special diets, either. Let 'em eat corn dogs.The greatest weapon we could apply to fighting terrorists is common sense.
Ralph Peters' new book, "Looking for Trouble," hits stores next week.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment