Wednesday, November 30, 2005

The Truth about the Left

This is just a snip from a larger article in the American thinker written by Vasko Kohlmayor - he pins down the true meaning and heart of the liberal left -


The War on Terror has brought on many complex problems and challenges. Perhaps none is more critical than the conduct of the political Left which is apparently set on sabotaging our efforts. Unable to come up with a logical explanation, political observers either throw up their hands in bewilderment or ascribe the Left’s posture to some irrational nihilistic impulse. But such conclusions are neither satisfactory nor correct.

The Left’s sabotage of this war is a deliberate attempt to give relief to the other side. This is because their corresponding views on capitalism and the West make Islamic radicals and the Left natural allies. The Left seeks to weaken us from within in order to help those whose shared worldview binds them in a common pact. Once we understand the nature of this stealth partnership, the reasons behind the Left’s often seemingly inexplicable actions will become alarmingly apparent.

Liberals in Retreat

President Bush gave another great speech today at the Navel academy. He left no question as to what his plans are for the war in Iraq. He promised as long as he was Commander and Chief, we would not leave Iraq until we have complete victory over the terrorists. With force and conviction he once again explained what we have accomplished and what the future will be.

The Democrats hated the speech - the lame-stream-media was sure that he was going to set a schedule to withdraw the troops - how foolish of them - of course, they aren't used to dealing with a President that has values. I guess that's why they look so foolish so often. I think their managed news department needs to be reviewed.

When John Murtha gave his 'cut and run' speech, I wondered then what his purpose was, given that he knew, as well as anybody, that we are actually winning the war in Iraq.

I believe all of the loud mouthed liberals know exactly what is going on in that country and that is what is scaring them the most - they know that we are winning but their whole agenda is based on the premise that we have to lose the war and have the whole world look down on us as a corrupt super power that is out of control, just as John Kerry proclaimed before the 2004 elections that he lost. I can hear them now in one big booming voice ' see, we told you so'.

As I said yesterday, the liberal Democrats have no morals - they have no values to guide them. All they have is the guide book given to them by the puppet masters called, as you may remember from past posts, Demofantesy.

Really, as a guide it isn't much because the puppet masters still control everything that the Democrats do including what they say. If you look closely, you can see the string attached to their mouths as well as the the rest of their bodies. How else can one explain the stupid things that they say as they bounce around from one position to another.

Before the new assault by Bush, all Democrats, along with their media whores, proclaimed the war a failure. All those dead American boys for nothing. Bring them home now. All is lost. John Murtha was only the latest to make a fool of himself. Nancy Pelosi is also a gem.

Now they see it didn't work to destroy Bush by bringing the country to it's knees, they have proclaimed that they have always been for a just ending to the war. What?

John Kerry, of all people, attacked the president saying that he and many other senators have always supported the position that we had to gain a winning foothold in Iraq before we would start withdrawing the troops. Did you ever wonder where he got the nick name 'flipflop'. The liberal Democrats have no problem changing their position on any subject as the situation demands.

it's clear to me that the liberals see that the news of Iraqi successes in their economy, military, education and infrastructure can not be hidden from the general public now that the Bush administration in on the attack. False press releases and out and out lies by the Democrats have always worked before, but now the tide is turning, the liberal Democrats must dance to a different tune to meet the changing situation.

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

liberals Gene Pool

Why is it so hard for people like Richard Clarke, Congressmen Murtha and others to understand what is going on in the middle east and, essentially, everywhere else in the world? What back ground experience do these people have, or lack, that would propel them in a direction that would mean certain defeat for this country? What do they hope to gain by surrendering our national respect and pride? If put to the test, we would even fail John Kerry's World
test - how bad is that?

Most of the world leaders know what the function of the United States is, and that is to lead everyone else as the only remaining super power. They do not like us because of our influence around the world, but they also know, down deep in their pitiless hearts, that without our military might, financial heavy weight status and sense of moral justice, the world would be set adrift, resulting in catastrophic collapse.

Who would hold the moral compass? France? Germany? - yeah, right - just look at their ability to conrol their own people. Who in this country would hold the compass without George Bush or Dick Cheney? What Democrat in the news today would be able to stand up and take the raigns of government and lead? Who would you trust to lead? Joe Lieberman? Maybe.

I believe that the liberal Democrats have no idea who they are or understand the consequences of there actions in demanding surrender and defeat at the hands of the terrorists. I also believe the people that follow the liberal Democrats are as badly disillusioned as the European community.

They have slipped their anchor and are now adrift in a calm sea of prosperity. They are a generation that lives on the edge - in debt up to their eye balls but moving forward in an economy that is showing strong growth and more promise for the future than any since the early 90's. But it's the me gereration all over again. They seem not to have any roots. They always look for the easy way out, the quick kill.

As always happens in real life, the wind will come up on the lake and start rocking the boat, and without an anchor, our freeloaders are in a world of hurt. In the end, of course, someone has to pay the piper that lead these people astray. Where will the Democrats stand on these real life problems?

With the middle east in flames and a European community in total disarray, fighting for their very lives against an immigrant population that wants what everybody else has and they want it now, the American economy sliding into recession due to high taxes and social programs that are out of control, what do you think the answer will be from the Democrats that demanded isolation, that we mind our own business and bring the troops home now. What will they say as to why we let all of this get out of control? Do you think they will take the responsibility for their actions? I think not -

The Democrats always have a way out - they will blame someone else for not having the foresight to see this coming. They will spin, lie and twist in the wind, but there always seems to be enough people around to give them credit. How can that be?

This brings us back to who are these people are and, really, where do they come from. Some of the people in the boats on the lake are our neighbors and relatives. You have to ask how did they get into this mess in the first place? Where did they get the idea that there wasn't a tomorrow?

But then where do the liberals politicians come from? I believe they came from a distant gene pool that started forming shortly after the earth's crust cooled and have been a source of pain and anguish for us all ever since.

Really, they don't think like the rest of us, they have no sense of community or family or country. They live for the moment. They take whatever is within their grasp and they believe that they are entitled to it as well. They have no sense of remorse.

They are not like the rest of us in America, they are mentally and physically different. How they evolved this way can only be explained by close investigation into our dim past. As we have all seen in the media, some are worse than others but there is no telling when one will step up and be the worst one yet -

Be alert and stand your ground - luckily there are more of us than there is of them. Hey, they are easy to spot as well; when something bad happens, just watch for those that run for cover. This is a great country!!



Monday, November 28, 2005

Bush in Kyoto Japan

Go figure, Bush is not the bumbling goof that the left thinks he is. But as long as they, the liberal left, think is just a 'cowboy', they will always underestimate him and they will always come off looking like sour grapes, i.e., losers.

In Japan, he really laid it on the line. Of course it was mostly about how things that are changing in the Asian hemisphere or the Pacific Rim, if you will, and of the things that need to be changed in the future. China was the main topic here.

What a great speech. It was all about how China has to change to meet it's obligation to future generations and how it's people will, must, embrace democracy of some kind to realize their full potential. He held up Taiwan as a good example of a people who rose to their potential after generations of struggle building their own free and democratic society. China, I sure, did not find this to their liking.

No less important was the transformation of the Japanese, he proclaimed. He was explaining how the Japanese people have a democracy that is different but yet the basic foundation of human rights and freedom reigns supreme and that they will always have the support of the American government and a friend in the American people.

This speech was a high water mark of his Asian tour. We haven't heard to much about it in the lame-stream-media, so you know it was a success.

The speech told a lot about who Bush is in that he has not wavered from his agenda on freedom and democracy for all peoples and nations. World leaders need not try and second guess what he is about, they know by his consistent and hard driving beliefs that have propelled him to free 50 million people in Afghanistan and Iraq.

It has not been easy or cheap but he saw what had to be done. He attacked!! He took the fight to the enemy. The terrorist understand who he is and they fear him. He is not afraid to handle the tough problem. He doesn't shrink from the responsibility of placing this country at risk to defend the principles that it was founded on. Strong leaders of this country have always risen to meet and defeat the enemy. But from our recent history of inaction and hand wringing, the terrorists didn't think we would do anything to defend our selves. President Bush proved they were dead wrong.

As long as America stands strong and fast to its ideals and beliefs in freedom and democracy for everyone, we will win the peace. But if we allow the naysayers and the weak-of-will to dominated with their agenda of isolation and defeatism, then we will lose the war for peace and security for our selves and future generations. There is no turning back the clock to a past time when everything seemed to be all sun shine and blue water. All that went away when the Dotcom bubble burst and the Twin Towers were turned into dust.

As the old saying goes and you know it's true, 'you can never go home'. President Bush is showing us the way, leading by example, so now all we have to do is follow. What a concept.

Sunday, November 27, 2005

First In -

I just finished reading a great book call First In - An Insiders Account of How the CIA Spearheaded the War on Terror in Afghanistan by Gary C. Schroen

Shortly after 9/11, President Bush ordered the CIA to send in a forward team of agents to help organize the Afghan resistance armies, the Northern Alliance, to attack and destroy the entrenched Taliban terrorists that controlled much of Afghanistan including Kabul.

One of the CIA's main objectives was to get the Northern Alliance and their assorted war lords that they controlled to operate and communicate as a unit and to coordinate air attacks on the Taliban when the time was right.

Maybe the main objective was to kill or capture as many of the leaders of the Taliban and Al- Qa'ida as possible, especially Osama bin Ladin, the terrorist directly responsible for the attack on the United States.

It reads like a novel but it is a factual account of a hand full of trained expert agents in everything from communication, weapons, combat tactics, diplomacy and languages with a heavy dose of experience of dealing with hostel third world countries. They proved to be up to the job.

I also read General Tommy Frank's book called The American Soldier which gave the over view of the war to reclaim Afghanistan. He told of the organizing of the Air Force and Special Forces units that were required to be deployed with the Northern Alliance units as they drove the terrorists out of kabul. This paved the way for Hamid Karzai to take the rains of an interim government and eventually win the presidency in free elections.

It's a must read to get the back ground of how we went on the offensive and attacked and killed some of those forces that attacked us. Unfortunately we didn't have the opportunity to kill bin ladin, but I believe we are getting closer every day.

Friday, November 25, 2005

Multicluralism - Bah Humbug

Multiculturalism seems to be the coming trend in this country - the liberal elites us it as a form of equalizing the pressure of the on rushing of the new middle class; the hard working and loyal family man and woman that wants something better for themselves and their off spring other then servitude offered by the left, and the new immigrants that seem to not want to assimilate with the American idealism of all men created equal with freedom for and the pursuit of happiness.

I believe most of the immigrants that are in this country are family based and religious Christians which means they have a base of decency that is founded on laws that have been handed down from the earliest Christians. That is Christian values and morals.

It's estimated that there are over 10 million illegal immigrants in this country today and more arriving every day. Most of these are Spanish and Christian from Mexico. Most by far do not seek to do this country harm. Many speak mostly Spanish and little English, but you almost never hear of a protest march demanding more programs to make life easier for them. Every now and then there is some trouble in California, but that doesn't represent the majority.

The left wants to make sure that these people never get a chance to rise above the poverty level just like the choke hold that they have on the black community, because if they begin to have a sense of independence and demand their chance to make a life in this country and vote their conscience, the liberal Democrats are done.

The blacks are trying to get out from under the heel of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to make their presence felt in the community. It has always been amazing to me why the black community votes Democrat. What have they done for them? Why is it that a majority of successful blacks are Republicans and the struggling blacks are Democrats, not all, but most. It has been this way for decades.

Multiculturalism is just a tool that the left uses to created class warfare. Keep the Hispanics speaking Spanish and the blacks, gettospeak, so they can not assimilate and therefore never challenge the left elites for control of this country. The liberal agenda has always been to keep them down on welfare, and stupid, not attending school, and confused by listening to Jesse Jackson. The puppet masters believe If everyone speaks different languages, no one can communicate to try and get ahead. What a great way to get a class war going.

Look at what's happening in France and the Netherlands. Huge groups of ethnic Muslim youth that have never been allowed to be part of French society - the French did this on purpose. They gave them every opportunity to be anything but French.

It's a struggle that will last for something into the future here in America, but I believe the tide is turning in favor of the people. They are more in tune with what is important to the survival of this country. More and more people are tired of the continual drum beat of disinformation that the liberal media claims to be the news about how the lower classes, hard working ethnic people, are not part of the American experience. They are being left behind - baloney - These stories are fabrications. They are nothing but wedges that the liberals use to try and foster discontent in working American families of all ethnic groups.

The following is a short snippet from an article that was in the Weekly Standard by Leo McKinstry. As far as I'm concerned, this sums up what multiculturalism is to a tee:

As an ideology, multiculturalism is a corrupted form of Marxism in which race and nationality replace class. Like Marxism itself, it is an ideology that must be opposed if we are to preserve a country founded on the proposition that all men are created equal and endowed with certain unalienable rights.

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Fighting for America

On this day of days in our history, George Washington declared that we should give thanks to God for all our bounty and our great country. Amen to that.

America is the last great anchor that keeps the world from sliding into a black hole of violence and terrorism. Many Americans on this day hate what we stand for and have contempt for those that stand up and be counted for Freedom and Democracy.

With all of the bounty that we have here, one wonders how these people have come to the conclusion that we are the problem and that the best way to live in this world is on our knees or in mass graves. We have a choice.

The following is from an article in the Whisleblower Magazine by David Kupelian. It's only a few paragraphs of a larger article, but I believe it points up what we have to recognize as the physiology of terrorism and how it is playing out in America as we speak.

How terrorism works

On one level, terrorism works by simply causing us so much pain, suffering
and dread of future terror that we eventually weaken and give in to the
terrorists' demands. But the ultimate goal of terrorism is to capture our
hearts and minds – to convert us.

What? How can terrorizing us transform our attitudes in favor of the
terrorists' viewpoint? Wouldn't we recoil in horror and, if anything, move
farther away from sympathy toward the perpetrators? Not necessarily.
Remember, militant Muslims "convert" individuals to Islam by threat of
death. Why shouldn't they try the same tactic on entire societies?
Stop and consider what happens when we're intimidated and frightened by
terrorism, or even the threat of it. Wonder of wonders, some of us start to
sympathize with our enemy.

There's a funny thing about appeasement. It's hard to give in to evil
without first agreeing with that evil, at least a little. We have to allow
our minds to be bent, our previous values and perceptions altered, even
slightly; we somehow have to see the terrorists as not quite totally evil.
"Yes, they may be angry and even murderous, but after all, don't they have
legitimate grievances against us? Maybe we brought on this attack by our
past actions. Maybe we're at fault. Maybe their cause is just. Maybe we're
the real terrorists."

Does that sound like an exaggeration? Do you remember Cindy Sheehan, so
lionized by America's "mainstream press" as the courageous public face of
the antiwar movement? She referred to Islamic terrorists flocking to Iraq
to kill American soldiers as "freedom fighters." Meanwhile she calls the
president of the United States a "lying bastard," a "jerk," an "evil
maniac," a "gangster," a "war criminal," a "murderous thug" and – of course
– a "terrorist."

To become an appeaser, you have to sympathize with the enemy, either
overtly like Sheehan, or secretly. How else can you look at yourself in the
mirror and justify giving in to evil?

The question is, how do we come to side with those who are intent on
destroying us?

I think it is time for all of us to take a look at what these people are saying and how they mean to change the way we live.

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Give Thanks for America

I believe it is essential that we stop for a few minutes sometime this week end and reflect on what we have and where we live.

No matter where you are on the career pay scale or what rung of the corporate ladder you have reached, this land his given you and me everything. Most important of these gifts is the freedom to be who ever or what ever you think you can be. Through hard work, sacrifice and common sense in your travel to your definition of success, America was the key ingredient that made it happen.

We take it all for granted that we are able to move to other parts of the country if we want, anytime we want, attend religious services of our choosing, vote, protest or be nothing at all - there are all kinds of programs to take care of those who have no ambition, self discipline or the will to succeed. We do care about our neighbors. We spend treasure and lives to help those in need.

We are so lucky to be living in America. I thank God ever day for this privilege. I thank God for the men and women that are fighting and dying for me in all parts of the world and they have done this many times before.

Our freedom is not free. As the saying goes, 'there is no free lunch', - somebody has to pay. We have so many people to thank for our success. It all started several hundred years ago when brave men stood firm and gave up all that they had in worldly positions including their lives for a principle.

We must stand firm now so that those that follow us will say they gave all they had to ensure freedom for future generations. We have no choice, it's who we are and it's what we do and have done since the beginning. Land of the free and home of the brave - God Bless America!

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Room at the Top

I wonder if it ever occurred to anyone on the left that they have never proposed an alternative plan to what President Bush is doing and has done for this country and the world. Not once have I heard or read where Harry Reid or one of his ink had stood before congress and laid out a proposal that was different from the President's and that would take this country forward.

Don't hold your breath, it's not going to happen. It would be like asking your dog for the time of day - - -

The Democrats are a party of the negative, where as the Republicans are a party of the positive. President Bush has made several good proposal on the domestic policy front concerning Social Security reform, the economy, trade, heath care to some degree and picking supreme Court judges, most of the time. Immigration needs a lot of work.

But foreign policy, though, has been the shining star in his administration. It's easy to see his accomplishments because now everyone hates us, which means we are leading the way for others to follow. Everyone loved Clinton and he lead us nowhere.

Even members of the Presidents own party, the so called moderates, are part of that negative clan. They don't understand what it means to jump on the band wagon as it pulls away from the platform. They're left standing wring their collective hands wonder who will explain to the conservative public how they got left behind along with the liberal Democrats.

Bush can't wait for the moderates to make up their minds if they will support him or not - many have said they need to govern from the center and be more inclusive with the opposition. What a laugh! How can they govern while sitting on the fence waiting to see which way the wind is blowing.

The opposition isn't going to do that because their agenda is set in stone. By hook or by crook they want and will get back into power. As we speak they are sneaking up on the fence sitting Republicans ready to cut their collective political throats. The morons never learn. The liberals never take prisoner. Some conservatives think they know the democrats and the best way to get along is to reach out. Remember that word inclusive? - heh - Right! Bull roar!

The liberal Democrats are not doers. They are not innovative or exhibit traits of self discipline. They're carpet baggers, hangers-on, blood suckers, fat, out of work relatives and, of course, politicians of the first rank. They are always looking for the easy way out; a scapegoat. Just look what eight years of Bill Clinton did the this country. They have no intention of doing anything constructive or far reaching. They are the party that takes the payroll to the bank but instead of making a deposit, they skips town with the whole thing.

The Democrats are always complaining that President Bush does everything wrong but they never show us how they would do it better.

There is a saying that I have always found interesting when it comes to people complaining about those that are rich or have accomplished great things :
"There is plenty of room at the top but no place to sit" You have to love that -

Monday, November 21, 2005

Listen and Learn

Roy Moody was right on the money when he said " The greatest motivational act one person can do for another is to listen" hits the nail on the head concerning the rhetoric in the Congress these past several days.

unfortunately most of the members of the angry left have a bad habit of listening only to their own rhetoric and therefore have become very confused on determining what is reality and what is fantasy. Their play book doesn't cover original thought, so when it occurs in a conversation, panic sets in.

The liberal Democrats rely on the Demofantasy manual, supplied by the puppet masters, to supply all of their talking points, but has made no provision for producing logical counter points to the proposals made by the opposition.

When Vice President Cheney attacked the Senate criminals today, he made several good points that the anti-America thugs and despots in that sorted body should have taken to heart. He listed them plainly and matter of factually. All they had to do is listen to what he had to say and use common sense and a little history to come to a conclusion that they are wrong headed in their blind charge to defeat the President on the war.

Jean Schmidt said it from the floor of the House of representatives, Murtha was a coward and not a Marine, and received cries of fowl play to the extent the house leader demanded order- heh -

She was on top of her program - and did the Democrats listen and learn? - absolutely not - they had no idea what she was talking about. Coward, indeed, why he's a Marine that served his country twenty five years ago. Quick, circle the wagons, get out the mattresses, this was the call to arms, this is going to be a long one.

The liberal media elites were all over this 'put down' of a true hero and favorite son of America, but when the Republicans demanded a vote to see if all the Democrats would actually stay hunkered down with Murtha, it was 403 to 3 against the brave Marine of by gone days - the puppet masters flicked their wrists, the strings jumped and the Demofastists all voted like war heroes.

The puppet master decided that it was best not to have the public see who the liberal Democrats really were. Physical and moral cowards. True socialists.

Now the charge is on by the Bush Administration to defend itself, finally. This is only the first round in what I hope will be a good 'smack down' of the liberal left ant-everything Democrats in the weeks to come.