Climate Change 'Global Warming' Not Settled Sceince : A Fraud Scienctists Say

This is not new - for years scientists have exposed the global warming, being caused by man, as a fraud. Thousands of scientists, 'Scientists Against Global Warming', have stepped forward years ago showing evidence that what has been seen as "settled science" in fact was just managed news for the purpose of getting government grants and establishing an agenda that sought to control the development and production of fossil fuel and eventually eliminated it as they claimed it caused 'green house gases' ,CO2, that is destroying the planet.

But with all the hype from a willing main stream media that is completely complaisant in advancing the agenda of this environmental fraud, many citizens are very willing to accept as fact what they see and hear regarding climate change from the press. That it isn't true doesn't enter the discussion.

Unfortunately it's easier, in this busy world we now live in, to just accept the head lines as fact then to take the time to be skeptical of what they hear and read. The media leaders are aware of this lack of skepticism and perpetuate the lie.

Former NASA Scientists Challenge Government Narrative On Global Warming
April 19, 2013 by Ben Bullard

PHOTOS.COM

A new study group composed of former NASA scientists is challenging the mainstream narrative on the validity of global warming.

About 20 scientists, most of them former members of the U.S. space program’s Apollo Team (the team that put America on the moon) organized The Right Climate Stuff research team last year to re-examine the belief that human-generated carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are creating a global warming crisis.

The team invited a number of scientists both for and against the conventionally accepted theory of global warming to study the issue, but stipulated that all presentations had to be backed by data.

A year later, the team has come out with a sort of progress report that indicates the way it’s leaning so far. The report makes six assertions:

1. The science that predicts the extent of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming is not settled science.
2. There is no convincing physical evidence of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming; most of the alarm results from output of unvalidated computer models.
3. Computer models need to be validated before being used in critical decision-making. “Our manned aerospace backgrounds in dealing with models of complex phenomena have convinced us that this rule must be followed to avoid decisions with serious unintended consequences.”
4. Because there is no immediate threat of global warming requiring swift corrective action, scientists have time to study global climate changes and improve prediction accuracy.
5. The U.S. government is overreacting to concerns about anthropogenic global warming. More carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would be beneficial for forest and crop growth to support the Earth’s growing population, so control of carbon dioxide emissions is not an obvious best solution to hyped-up concerns regarding anthropogenic global warming.
6. A wider range of solution options should be studied for global warming or cooling threats from any credible cause.

The findings aren’t unique among scientists who dissent from the mainstream take on global warming. The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change organized in the early 2000s as a research team united by a lack of a standing agenda on environmental policy.

“Because we are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, we are able to look at evidence the [U.N.-backed] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ignores,” explains the group’s website. “Because we do not work for any governments, we are not biased toward the assumption that greater government activity is necessary.”