Yikes! ObamaCare was never designed to be a workable solution to provide health care for everyone, it was designed to bring the population under the control of the federal government. To believe anything else means you are generically altered, therefore insane and a progressive socialist Democrat.
Most States Will Lose Money Expanding Medicaid
March 18, 2013
Source: Drew Gonshorowski, "Obamacare and the Medicaid Expansion: How Does Your State?" Heritage Foundation, March 5, 2013.
Medicaid expansion has been touted by proponents as a no-brainer because it will save states money. However, this appears to be true only for states with already bloated Medicaid programs. For the majority of states, expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will cost money, says Drew Gonshorowski of the Heritage Foundation.
- Forty of the 50 states are projected to see increases in costs due to Medicaid expansion.
- Only New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Vermont and Wisconsin stand to save money.
- For these the states, restructuring their existing programs will allow them to transfer substantial cost to the federal ledger.
- States are unlikely to cut payments because the ACA already cuts federal Medicaid payments.
- Between 2014 and 2020, $18.1 billion will be cut out of federal Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital funding and $22.1 billion will be cut from Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital funding.
- Federal cuts will likely push hospitals and clinics to push for more -- not less -- supplemental state payments.
Medicaid expansion will cost most, if not all, states money and increase pressure on state legislators who must balance their budgets with the need for providers to recoup their costs.
No comments:
Post a Comment