Thursday, May 10, 2012

Wind Power Wastes Money and Energy

Here is a lot of proof that wind power is not ready for prime time - ! but this really doesn't matter to the environmentalists that have a gripe on the nations wallet.


If this source of electrical generation is so viable why not allow it to expand on it own? Why not let it compete with gas, oil and coal? Oh wait, that would mean no access to taxpayers money to line the pockets of progressive liberal environmentalist and their political friends in Washington.

Remember what this is all about, power and control and nothing else.

Why We Need to Terminate Big Wind Subsidies

Source: Paul Driessen, "Why We Need to Terminate Big Wind Subsidies," Townhall.com, May 8, 2012.


The American wind power lobby has engaged in a full-court press to expand the role of wind in America's energy sector. Pushing for bills at both the federal and state levels, industry advocates like the American Wind Energy Association insist that subsidies for their products will produce huge returns for American consumers in clean, renewable electricity, says Paul Driessen at Townhall.com

However, a large coalition of citizens around the country finally seems to have had its eyes opened to the truly disingenuous claims of the lobby, urging representatives and senators to run to ground wind-supporting bills. Substantial reasons to oppose the lobby can be found in their impact on energy production alone.

•Turbines average only 30 percent of their "rated capacity" -- and less than 5 percent on the hottest and coldest days, when electricity is needed most.
•In fact, turbines frequently draw electricity from the grid to keep blades turning when the wind is not blowing.
•Moreover, despite tens of billions in subsidies, wind turbines still generate less than 3 percent of U.S. electricity.

Their harmful impact on the energy industry is not the only reason to oppose turbines' continued government support: further reasons can be found in their economic and environmental impacts.

•Wind has never been able to compete economically with traditional energy, and there is no credible evidence that it will be able to in the foreseeable future.
•This is especially true given the current bottoming out of electricity rates associated with abundant natural gas production.
•Furthermore, as Spain, Germany, Britain and other countries have learned, wind energy mandates and subsidies drive up the price of electricity.
•Environmentally, the manufacturing of turbines, their transportation and installation, and the laying of dense networks of transmission lines produce substantial emissions and create a significant footprint.
•Wind turbines, transmission lines and backup generators also require vast amounts of crop, scenic and wildlife habitat land.
•U.S. wind turbines also slaughter nearly half a million rare, threatened, endangered and otherwise protected flying creatures every year.
•There is no evidence that even thousands of U.S. wind turbines will affect future global temperatures by more than a few hundredths of a degree.



No comments: