Plastic Bag Ban A Bogus Agenda

Again, who are the people that started this campaign to get rid of plastic bags without good evidence of how we all can benefit? Why aren't they asked these questions and then demand answers made the front and center agenda of the 'news' media? Sure I know, they are progressives, liberal left socialists and all they want is what's best for all of us!

Guess what, as even the most unaware citizen will know if they given the chance to decide on what's best for themselves, they will say they can make those decisions, not someone who thinks they are the smartest person in the room.

Plastic Bag Ban Will Not Achieve Goals
Source: Jay Beeber, "Plastic Bag Ban Will Put Los Angeles In Landfill," Reason Magazine, May 23, 2012.

The city of Los Angeles is set to impose the nation's harshest regulation on disposable shopping bags. By prohibiting the distribution of both plastic and paper bags, the city council claims it will attain a number of benefits that are direly wanted by its citizens. However, careful analysis of each supposed benefit shows that the ban is unlikely to provide any such value, says Jay Beeber in Reason Magazine.

First, proponents of the ban claim that it will reduce the amount of waste produced by the city and therefore reduce the size of necessary local landfills.

•California's Statewide Waste Characterization Study shows that "Plastic Grocery and Other Merchandise Bags" consistently make up just 0.3 percent of the waste stream in the state.
•This compares strikingly with organic waste such as food and yard clippings (which make up 32 percent) and construction debris (30 percent).
•Therefore, the effect of eliminating free grocery bags on the amount of waste generated in the city would be insignificant.

Second, ban advocates argue that in addition to reducing aggregate waste, it will reduce the amount of waste that remains in public areas in the form of litter.

•However, litter studies from across the country demonstrate that, on average, plastic retail bags make up only about 1 percent to 2 percent of all litter.
•Furthermore, previous bans have not been shown to directly address this issue.
•In San Francisco, for example, plastic bags comprised 0.6 percent of litter before the city banned plastic bags and 0.64 percent a year after the ban took effect.

Third and finally, supporters of the ban contend that it will support air quality, citing the completely fallacious figure that 12 million barrels of oil are used annually in the manufacture of plastic bags.

•In reality, plastic bags made in the United States are not derived from oil; they're made from a byproduct of domestic natural gas refinement.
•Additionally, the reusable bags used as a substitute are usually imported from overseas -- a process that involves substantial emissions from cargo ships.
•This doesn't even account for the fact that the materials necessary to make reusable bags usually are not recyclable and require enormous energy inputs into agriculture (cotton).