Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Israel Defends It's Self Against Western and Eastern Left Terrorists

Just what is Israel suppose to do about Arab terrorist killing it's people? Would we stand by and let that happen in America? Well , maybe, now with Obama at the controls.

Great article by Ralph Peters -


DAMNED IF THEY DO
By RALPH PETERS

December 29, 2008

DEAD Jews aren't news, but killing terrorists outrages global activists.
On Saturday, Israel struck back powerfully against its tormentors. Now
Israel's the villain. Again.

How long will it be until the UN General Assembly passes a resolution
creating an international Holocaust Appreciation Day?
Israel's airstrikes against confirmed Hamas terrorist targets in the
Gaza Strip were overdue, discriminating and skillful. So far, this
retaliatory campaign has been a superb example of how to employ
postmodern airpower.

Instead of bombing empty buildings in the dead of night in the hope of
convincing bloodthirsty monsters to become peace-loving floral arrangers
- the US Air Force version of "Shock and Awe" - the Israeli Defense
Force aimed to /kill/ terrorists.
Israel's attack aircraft appear to have accomplished that part of the
mission. As I write, some 300 terrorist dead have been reported in Gaza,
while the propaganda-savvy information office of Hamas has strug- gled
to prove that 20 civilians died.

Given the fact that Hamas adheres to the terrorist practice of locating
command sites, arsenals and training facilities in heavily populated
areas, the results suggest that the IDF - supported by first-rate
intelligence work - may have executed the most accurate wave of
airstrikes in history, with a 15-to-1 terrorist-to-civilian kill ratio.
The bad news is that it still won't be enough. While Israel has
delivered a painful blow against Hamas, it's still not a paralyzing hit.
The only way to neuter such a terror threat - even temporarily - is to
go in on the ground and scour every room, basement and underground
tunnel in a region.

That would mean high Israeli casualties and, of course, condemnation of
Israel's self-defense efforts by every self-righteous, corrupt and
bigoted organization and government on earth, from Turtle Bay to Tehran.
What have been Israel's "crimes?" Not "stealing Palestinian land," but
making that land productive, while exposing the incompetence and sloth
of Arab culture.

Israel's crime isn't striking back at terror, but demonstrating, year
after year, that a country in the Middle East can be governed without
resort to terror. Israel's crime hasn't been denying Arab rights, but
insisting on human rights for women and minorities.
Israel's crime has been making democracy work where tyranny prevailed
for 5,000 years. Israel's crime has been /survival/ against overwhelming
odds, while legions of Arab nationalists, Islamist extremists and
Western leftists want every Jew dead.

But Israel's greatest crime was to expose the global cult of victimhood,
to prove that hard work, fortitude and courage could overcome even
history's grimmest disaster.

Was it a crime to hand Gaza back to Palestinian authorities, to give
peace a chance? Look what Israel received in return for trading land for
peace.

Let us /never/ forget the fundamental truth that, while Israel longs to
live in peace with its neighbors, those neighbors openly profess the
desire to eliminate Israel and exterminate its people.
Indeed, Arab and regional jealousy toward Israel is so all-consuming, so
/necessary/ to excuse the Arab art of failure, that even these judicious
airstrikes will hardly make a dent in the terrorist threat.
Unless Israel sends in ground forces for the long haul - and thousands
of IDF reservists are being mobilized - there will be, at best, a
temporary respite from terror attacks. Even a new occupation of Gaza
would not fully solve the problem.

A crucial point about interfaith and interethnic conflicts that we
sheltered Americans refuse to understand is that, all too often, there's
just no good solution - and not even a bad solution, short of acts of
barbarism.

It's a rare conflict that results in an enduring peace. Unintended
consequences abound. At times, you fight just to buy time, to gain
breathing space - or merely to frustrate an enemy's designs for a
limited period.

That's the situation Israel faces: No hope of an ultimate victory, but a
constant fight to survive. Enemies who believe their god ordains their
actions can't be placated. For faith-fueled terrorists, such as the core
members of Hamas, the struggle with Israel's a zero-sum game. Compromise
is, at most, an expedient tool, never an acceptable end state.
What will we see in the coming days? Much depends on Israel's resolve.

The most probable scenario is that Hamas will continue launching terror
rockets for a few weeks to salve its wounded vanity and maintain the
image of "resistance," but will ultimately reduce its attacks against
Israel - while it rebuilds its cadres and restocks its arsenal.
Israel will have bought time, not peace.

What might Israel have done better? It's /essential/ to take out the top
terrorist leaders. But Israel's government remains reluctant to target
the cowardly Hamas leaders hiding in Damascus - or even the top
terrorists remaining in Gaza.

For terrorist bosses, the rank-and-file are disposable and replaceable.
You can't just kill the gunmen. You have to kill the names.
We may sympathize with the average Palestinian family, exploited by
/generations/ of corrupt leaders and now caught in yet another round of
violence. But let us never forget that Israel hasn't fired thousands of
blind rockets into Palestinian cities, that Israeli suicide bombers
don't attack Arab restaurants and bus stops, and that Israel seeks to
avoid harming civilians - while Hamas seeks to kill as many civilians as
possible.

In a world where there are no good answers, Israel just answered as best
it could. The world's response? "How dare Jews defend themselves."
Humanity doesn't progress. It just changes clothes.

No comments: