Is Kavanaugh Telling The Truth? Is Ford Lying? Results Matter!

It is about understanding a simple truth about right and wrong. But this seems to be a stumbling block for those among us who have an agenda for destruction at any cost. Being right has nothing to do with it, only being loud and obnoxiously ignorant and with criminal intent to destroy. 

Right Wisconsin Magazine 

Now that the investigation is over, who should we believe?

James Wigderson - Editor : RightWisconsin

Dear Readers,

Like you, we're a little distracted around here by the success of the Milwaukee Brewers. As I'm typing this, the Brewers are winning Game 1 against the Colorado Rockies. But as much as we want to escape into the national pastime, our attention is also drawn to a different umpire, and the stakes are much higher than a baseball game.

The Democrats got what they wanted. They got an FBI investigation, the seventh investigation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh's professional life. And, as we expected, nothing new was found.

So will Democrats back down and support Kavanaugh's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court? Not likely. In fact, swing state Democrats are actually coming out against his nomination. It's no longer the charges against him, but whether he allegedly threw ice across a bar and how vigorously he defended his reputation when he spoke before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Suddenly Kavanaugh, who has never raised an eyebrow before with how he conducts himself, is now considered to lack the temperament to be a Supreme Court Justice.

Heck, some liberals aren't even willing to do that stretch. Even though the charges against him are unproven, Kavanaugh has to prove that a party that the alleged witnesses say never took place actually never took place - even though there is no accurate description of where or when it supposedly occurred. If he doesn't prove that something didn't occur when nobody can provide any evidence it actually occurred, then there will be an asterisk* next to his name forevermore.

Benjamin Wittes, writing in The Atlantic, is willing to take the risk that defeating Kavanaugh will set a terrible precedent:

I am also keenly aware that rejecting Kavanaugh on the record currently before the Senate will set a dangerous precedent. The allegations against him remain unproven. They arose publicly late in the process and, by their nature, are not amenable to decisive factual rebuttal. It is a real possibility that Kavanaugh is telling the truth and that he has had his life turned upside down over a falsehood. Even assuming that Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations are entirely accurate, rejecting him on the current record could incentivize not merely other sexual-assault victims to come forward—which would be a salutary thing—but also other late-stage allegations of a non-falsifiable nature by people who are not acting in good faith. We are on a dangerous road, and the judicial confirmation wars are going to get a lot worse for our traveling down it.

Wittes adds that he would vote against the nomination because of the asterisk factor. "I would also do it because whatever the truth of what happened in the summer of 1982, Thursday’s hearing left Kavanaugh nonviable as a justice," Wittes wrote. And then Wittes added, "He should remain a nominee, I argued, only if his defense would be sufficiently convincing that it would meet what we might term the 'no asterisks' standard—that is, that it would plausibly convince even people who vociferously disagree with his jurisprudential views that he could serve credibly as a justice."

So for Kavanaugh, the standard is now so high for Democrats that the only way he should be confirmed is if Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), who rejected Kavanaugh's nomination without any consideration, would now support his nomination.

It's at this point that I'm tempted to agree with Martha Laning, the chairman of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, who wrote on Facebook, "Really tired of white men not investigating situations before explaining it away."

Of course, she wrote that on the same day Democratic gubernatorial candidate Tony Evers (the whitest white man we know) said on Twitter he agreed with Baldwin in calling for a "full investigation" and then used the hashtag "#believesurvivors" indicating how much of an investigation he needed to find Kavanaugh guilty. By the way, we're tired of pale white guys like Evers explaining away misconduct by men, too.

Republicans should approve Kavanaugh's nomination and end this farce. He has had his good name destroyed in this process, yet he has continued to soldier on defending himself to anyone that will listen. Just because the Democrats won't listen doesn't mean they should be rewarded for their behavior.

James Wigderson
Editor
RightWisconsin

Who is An Expert? : It Depends On Common Sense

And here is the rest of the story concerning the definition of an expert. One definition is being more then twenty miles from home.

Psychiatrist vs. Bartender

Ever since I was a child, I've always had a fear of someone under my bed at night. So I went to a shrink and told him: “I've got problems. Every time I go to bed I think there's somebody under it. I'm scared. I think I'm going crazy.”

“Just put yourself in my hands for one year" said the shrink. "Come talk to me three times a week and we should be able to get rid of those fears.”

“How much do you charge?” “Eighty dollars per visit,” replied the doctor. “I'll sleep on it,” I said.

Six months later the doctor met me on the street. “Why didn't you come to see me about those fears you were having?” he asked. “Well, eighty bucks a visit, three times a week for a year, is $12,480.00 A bartender cured me for $10.00.

“Is that so?” With a bit of an attitude he said, “And how, may I ask, did a bartender cure you?” “He told me to cut the legs off the bed. There’s nobody under there now.”

It's always better to get a second opinion.

The ''M'' word Explained : Comedian Lists Muslims in Joke Line

Here's an interesting situation where the unthinkable, the political incorrect  meets the reality of every day life for everyone that isn't a radical Muslim.

The "M" Word...by comedian Jeff Foxworthy

Have you ever wondered why it's OK to make jokes about Catholics, Jews, Christians, the Pope, the Irish, the Italians, the Polish, the Hungarians, the Chinese, the French (including French Canadians), the elderly, bad golfers, men/women, blacks/whites, etc, but its insensitive to make jokes about the Muslims?

Well, it's time to level the playing field and be politically incorrect, by including our friends, the Muslims, on this grandiose list.

So Jeff Foxworthy did his part to include the Muslims on his list ...

1. If you grow and refine heroin for a living, but morally object to the use of liquor, You may be a Muslim.

2. If you own a $3,000 machine gun and a $5,000 rocket launcher, but can't afford shoes, You may be a Muslim.

3. If you have more wives than teeth, You may be a Muslim.

4. If you wipe your butt with your bare hand, but consider bacon to be unclean, You may be a Muslim.

5. If you think vests come in two styles, Bullet-proof and suicide, You may be a Muslim.

6. If you can't think of anyone that you haven't declared jihad against, You may be a Muslim.

7. If you consider television dangerous, but routinely carry explosives in your clothing, You may be a Muslim.

8. If you were amazed to discover that cell phones have uses, other than setting off roadside bombs, You may be a Muslim.

9. If you have nothing against women and think every man should own at least four, then you, too, may be a Muslim.

10. If you find this offensive and do not forward it, you are part of the problem here in North America but if you delete this, you are most likely a Muslim.

Bill Clinton, Hero, The Tefflon Man : Taking Power From The Little People

Bill really doesn't have to hide from anyone because of his sexual adventures, getting BJ's in Oval Orffice of the White House or raping seveal women was just for fun. Nothing to see here. The progressive socialsit liberal democrats love him and for good reason, he took power in the election by lying and he took power from the women he raped and never looked back.

He is the most Tefflon man ever in the world that loves tyrants and mental degenerates.

And it's one of the reason why the progressive socialist liberals hate Judge Kavanuagh, he and his friends believe there are laws and conscience to be reckoned with. Judge Kavanaugh is a perfect example of what a good and honest man looks and acts like.

democrats on the other hand don't believe in conscience, naturel or legislative laws. It is only about getting and keeping power and by any means necessary. People are just pawns to be used and abused at their leisure.

The press and the world at large will always grant him a free ride. As much as we are frustrated with social media that is biased toward progressive socialists, it is the tool at hand that will always follow Bill and others like him with a pathological indifference to personal tragedy among others.

The indifference to physical and moral suffering is the real face of progressive socialsit liberalism.

Wait For It! : Peter Peter Pumpkin Eater (Humor)

Just saying, things can go wrong even when you do everything possible to make sure they don't.

Good way to start the day.

Who Is Responsible For Failure? : Politicians Or Voters Or Both.

It's interesting to understand what's at stake for our country considering the elections next November 6th. It's not just that common sense might lose and lose badly when progressive socialist liberal democrats would take power, but perhaps something much worse. Many people who willingly vote democrat for no other reason then they always have, and therefore eliminate common sense from our country's political discourse, but have no idea of the consequences they will set in motion.

Given what has transpired during the Kavanaugh hearing from the progressive socialsit liberals attacking judge Kavanaugh for no other reason other then to prevent him from taking his place on the Supreme Court as a Conservative believing in the Constitution as the rule of law, but what they are doing is to set the stage for any other Conservative candidate as well, for any office that the democrats believe it is their personal birthright to control, for ever, that will be nominated and therefore must be destroyed.

This is who progressive socialist democrats are and always have been. Vicious, despicable and amoral members of a far left collective dedicated to the destruction of the American civil society as founded more the 240 years ago. To get and keep the power for control of all out comes, it is necessary to do that by any means necessary. Any means. There are no limits.

And if that's not enough, just think of all those that have given their last full measure to defend this last bastion of freedom and liberty, but then have some people like these democrats piss on their graves just to gain more power over others. It's a capitulation to the worst in the human corruption of spirit and ethics. But they are democrats.

But what about all of the voters that will line up to vote for the destruction of country and therefore their personal lives and that of their families due to ignorance or misinformation, are these voters no better then the depraved politicians that are leading the charge to cause harm and or destroy our society based on the rule of law?

Is ignorance of 'natural law' an acceptable reason for a gross failure to be informed?

Can we say then due to ignorance, misinformation and voters that are grossly uninformed on the actually events and conditions that exist in our country and the real world, can they be considered ''collateral damage'' and must accept responsibility for the failure of our society due the those they elected to lead our country?

But how do you hold people responsible for their actions when they have no clue what they are doing to start with. They live by the standard of ''When ignorance is bliss, it is folly to be wise''. It's just easier then having to make decisions based on reality.

Einstein's Formula About Speed And Direction : A Prophetic Political Variation

It really is about common sense. But what is so fearful about the coming election is there are so many people that are clueless, horribly uninformed and misinformed about just about everything that is going on around them.

When stupid is accepted as the new norm, only chaos and conflict result.  The variation of this famous formula here is pretty much on the mark given how Donald Trump and the Republicans have backed the ship of state out of the ditch where Barrrack and the progressive socialist liberal democrats left  it two years ago.

In nearly ever aspect of the countries condition, domestically or our foreign policy decisions, we are doing much better, in fact America has been reborn to give everyone a chance for a better life where it was declared by Barrrack that success and prosperity is a thing of the past.

And yet, ask most any porgressive democrat what they think about the direction of our leader is taking us, they will say, in unison, he has to be defeated, impeached, destroyed. 

Success scares the hell out of democrats. It makes them look like the failures they really are. Never vote democrat. It is about individual freedom and liberty to be what ever you want to be. Not dependent and subservient.           

                       E = mc ² (well, a variation)

 1.  If you were to strip naked and run around in a circle at the speed of 186,282 miles/sec (the speed of light), it would theoretically be possible for you to screw yourself.

2. However, since you are not physically capable of achieving that speed at your age, you can also accomplish the same result by voting democratic in the November election.

History Is Repeating Itself? : A Return of lynchings

History is a funny thing. No matter how hard some people deny it or scrub it from our books, it all comes back to one place in time for everyone can see who is responsible. Who did this and why? 

Who is to be believed? What is necessary for truth to prevail? Politicians?

Was Christian Ford lying or just a pawn to be used and abused like she herself says she was by others? Like those pictured here will deny it ever happened because they believed it was right and proper or some how have some doubt as to it legal implications. Back then it was the ideology of a  political party. The only thing missing in this picture here are the white pointy sheets.

Now today, what has changed in the politics of destruction? Are the same kind of people returning to finish the job they started so many years ago? Is history just repeating itself?

Maybe it won't result in people in opposition to the accepted narrative of destruction being hung from a lamp post or a tree, but none the less, those that have an opinion that differs with the mob will suffer the consequences that will kill them just the same by denying them the right to be innocent until proven guilty.

The Champion For Truth Emerges : Lindsey Graham

Finally, someone we can believe in. Someone that understands how the Republican and Conservative base really feels about progressive socialist liberal democrats stealing our freedom and liberty. Republicans and Conservatives really believe the porgressive socialsit liberal democrats what more the just power, they actually want to destroy everyone and everything that stands in their way, including the country itself if necessary.

Lindsey explains just how angry, frustrated and fearful

the Republican base really is as the watch the progressive

socialist democrats destroy our country's heritage.

democrats Will vote Their Consciense : Doing Exactly As They Are Told

Who would ever believe this story? Really? Millions of voters voted for Barrrack the second time. Given that, anything the democrats do is beyond the realm of reality.

democrat voters are a special breed. Uncompromised and 

uncomplicated. Just tell them where to make their mark.