But in the case of the BP oil spill, it wasn't Jones Act that stopped the clean up because foreign ship could not get into the area, it was that Mr Obama didn't want to clean up the mess before it reached the shore so he could us the oil that reached the shore as a club for his war on fossil energy against oil companies.
President Bush during Katrina temporarily stopped this law to help with the clean up. Mr Obama had no intention of doing this. So much could have been done to save the shore line in Louisiana as it took more then 60 days for the oil to reach the shore. But what good would that do for Mr Obama and his parties agenda hating fossil energy to attack the oil companies.
American Shipping Law Raises Prices for Consumers
Source: Jared Meyer, "Jones Act Is Still Jeopardizing America's Ports," Economics21, December 2, 2014.
December 4, 2014
A largely unknown federal statute requires that all goods being shipped by water between American ports must be transported on American-made and American-owned ships that have American crews. Why do we even have such a law? Jared Meyer of Economics21 says it originated in 1920, when a senator from Washington wanted to ensure that his state's ships would be used to transport goods to Alaska. Today, the law still has strong support from coastal states and unions.
What does the Jones Act mean for consumers? Nothing good, says Meyer -- because the law reduces competition, it raises costs on consumers who are forced to pay higher prices. He also notes that the law has kept much-needed goods out of states; when New Jersey ran out of road salt last winter, a foreign-owned vessel was available to bring the salt to the state, but it was stopped by federal officials due to the Jones Act, and New Jersey never received the shipment. Similarly, foreign ships were available to assist in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, but the Jones Act prevented them from aiding in the cleanup efforts.
Without competition from foreign shippers, American companies have less incentive to innovate, and high American shipping costs can deter business deals. Meyer notes that 80 percent of the difference between American and foreign ships is due to the cost of the American crew, whose expenses tend to be 4.5 times more than crew expenses on foreign ships.
The Houston Chronicle reports that foreign ships can transport crude oil from the Gulf to Canada for $2 per barrel, while it costs America's Jones Act-compliant ships $5 to $6 per barrel to take crude oil from the Gulf to America's Northeast.
What does the Jones Act mean for consumers? Nothing good, says Meyer -- because the law reduces competition, it raises costs on consumers who are forced to pay higher prices. He also notes that the law has kept much-needed goods out of states; when New Jersey ran out of road salt last winter, a foreign-owned vessel was available to bring the salt to the state, but it was stopped by federal officials due to the Jones Act, and New Jersey never received the shipment. Similarly, foreign ships were available to assist in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, but the Jones Act prevented them from aiding in the cleanup efforts.
Without competition from foreign shippers, American companies have less incentive to innovate, and high American shipping costs can deter business deals. Meyer notes that 80 percent of the difference between American and foreign ships is due to the cost of the American crew, whose expenses tend to be 4.5 times more than crew expenses on foreign ships.
The Houston Chronicle reports that foreign ships can transport crude oil from the Gulf to Canada for $2 per barrel, while it costs America's Jones Act-compliant ships $5 to $6 per barrel to take crude oil from the Gulf to America's Northeast.
No comments:
Post a Comment