How to Fight Islamofacism/Terrorists - Freedom of Speech

Here is a good example of how we, as individual citizens, can fight back against the monsters that want to destroy us. We have the right to our opinion and the freedom to express that opinion in anyway that we want as long as it is within the law of the land. Does this sound like rocket science?


The right to freedom of speech is something that the New Socialist Progressive Party, the liberals, wants to restrict or eliminate - they, the party, believe it is divisive, or in their minds, challenges their agenda. A true believer never wants a dissenting opinion that challenges their beliefs. The church of Obama and the church of global warming. There can be no debate. The facts are in, discussion is over.


The progressives believe there can not be any debate when it comes to the socialist agenda. Case in point, why do you think the universities have such a problem when a conservative is invited to speak on campus?


Freedom of speech is only free as long as you agree with the socialist progressive agenda.


This author lives in the heart of socialist country, the east coast. It's powerful and sensible. The article by Allen Dershowitz will posted next.


Keep the faith, the battle is joined.


FIGHTING BACK by an east coast conservative

Over the last five years I have given a lot of thought to what we must do to defend our society and culture from the attacks being mounted upon it by the Islamofacists, and the following sums up the conclusions I have come to, pleasant or not.


In the essay included below, Alan Dershowitz, never one of my favorite people, addresses what is perhaps the key issue in our war with Islamic Facism, the lack of distinction between combatants and civilians.


Western Society's unwillingness to regard non-uniformed individuals among the enemy as combatants is perhaps one of the most destructive side effects of Political Correctness and Multi-Culturalism run wild. In a perfect world, we would be able to avoid killing non-combatant civilians in the course of fighting, but we do not live in such a world. Yes we have precision weapons that enable us to avoid large scale destruction of non-targeted habitations and populations, and yes it makes sense to use all weapons carefully.


Avoiding unnecessary death and destruction is in accord with our [Western] moral and ethical principals and conscience, but counts as nothing to an enemy who believes that dying as a suicide bomber is the path to bliss.


During WWII the Allies killed hundreds of thousands of German and Japanese civilians during aerial bombing missions, and it was considered regrettable but necessary to win; we did it, and we won. Today, we are fighting an enemy that recognizes no moral or ethical limitations on its efforts to kill infidels, and Western society's intellectual dishonesty and moral squeamishness gains it nothing but more dead soldiers AND civilians.


Today the Islamofacists are using the dishonest pretensions of the Radical Left, and their handmaidens in the mainstream media, to weaken our will to win and even our will to survive. If the Western World does not wake up and recognize that the doctrine of cultural equivalence is equivalent to "drinking the coolaid" we will indeed be destroyed.


There are enormous practical and ethical differences between Islamic Culture, as it is practiced, and Western Christian Culture, and those differences are between a free society that recognizes and values individual rights, and a 14th Century theocratic dictatorship, based upon hate, violence, conquest and intolerance.


Western society must recognize that its values are distinct from those of Islam, that they are based upon recognition of the inherent worth of the individual, a respect for life and liberty, and religious tolerance. The defense of these Western values does not demand perfection from our military, but only a reasonable effort to avoid unnecessary death and destruction in the Process Of Achieving Victory.


Unreasonable restrictions upon our military are tantamount to aiding and abetting the enemy. Without victory in this war we have had forced upon us, all our cherished Western morals and ethics are no more than dust blowing in the wind! As Dershowitz recommends we need new rules for dealing with Islam, a culture of death, and in my opinion, those rules should include at least the following:


Anyone who knowingly or unknowingly, aids the enemy, is in fact, an enemy combatant and should be treated as such. During battle situations, our military, must be the ultimate judge of who is an enemy and who is not, and they MUST not be second guessed by a hoard of petty fogging lawyers bent upon making a reputation for themselves.


Media representatives allowed access to our military operations must be restricted to those who can be trusted not to make propaganda for the enemy.


Media operations must clearly understand that publishing information that may lead to death or injury of US military or civilian personal is considered treason and will be treated as such.