Muslim Terrorists in Suicide Training

Is this how it really works? - we make lite of this but there are thousands that have been killed by these insane people -

This is good for a laugh but we all have to worry a little about how these people think and what impact they have on us in this country - real Muslims in America and elsewhere have a problem deciding what and who to believe. Their lives depend on it.


Everyone seems to be wondering why Muslim terrorists are so quick to commit suicide. Let's see now...

No Jesus
No Christmas No television
No cheerleaders
No Nude Women
No car races
No football
No soccer
No pork BBQ
No hot dogs
No burgers
No chocolate chip cookies
No lobster
No nachos
No Beer nuts
No Beer !!!!!!!!
Rags for clothes and towels for hats.
Constant wailing from the guy next-door because he's sick and there are no doctors.
Constant wailing from the guy in the tower.
More than one wife.
You can't shave.
Your wives can't shave..
You can't shower to wash off the smell of donkey cooked over burning camel dung.
Your bride is picked by someone else.
She smells just like your donkey.
Then they tell you that when you die it all gets better!

I mean, really, is there a mystery here?

Leon Panetta Another Inside Man for Democrat National Committee?

I find it almost impossible to believe that Leon Panetta will, in any sense, be good for the CIA - given his background with the Clintons, and that he is a liberal like most everyone associated with Obama or the Clintons, why wouldn't he use the CIA to build an agency that will be used by the Democrat National Committee to undermine any conservative attempts protect this country from foreign influence. Liberal Democrats look to high profile socialists for inspiration on population control.

Remember socialism is about control of populations by intimidation and fear and what better way of doing that then with people that have the inside intelligence on how to do that, i.e. the CIA.

It isn't lost on most of us that the liberal Democrats love foreign tyrants that use their power to crush opposition with violence in any form. Hugo Chavez in Venezuela , Kim in North Korea, Castro and his brother in Cuba and Putin in Russia to mention only a few. Witness the big wet kisses that Jimmy Carter gave Chavez when Jimmy lied about election fraud in Venezuela. Socialist liberals all.

Also, why wouldn't he use his power to hire people that would be sympathetic to his way of thinking when it comes to attacking a Republican administration like they did George Bush's. Isn't this standard procedure for Democrats? If this is only part of the Democrat agenda to "change" America, then why not use the FBI as well. They can work together - it worked great in the old Soviet Union for awhile, remember.

Given what happened last November 4th, it can happen here as well. Oh, wait - they have already done this with fifty years of Democrat control of congress. Just think about all of the people in the State Department and the courts that are under the thumb of the DNC. Bad people, nah - just good liberal Democrats.

What a plus for the DNC, though, to have a man on the inside of such an agency as the CIA - if the conservatives ever win another election, the DNC can use loyal troops buried deep in the agency to leak information to embarrass or crush a conservative administration, like they did to George Bush. Is this a shadow government at work? Maybe.

The only thing we can "hope" for is all those that voted for freedom last November will rise up and demand common sense. Now that is real "hope we can believe in".

Keep the faith.

Some in D.C. Pleased With Panetta Pick

Critics have voiced dismay and even anger over President-elect Barack Obama’s choice of Leon Panetta as the new CIA director — but not everyone in Washington is distressed with the decision.

“I actually think Panetta is a good choice,” a source in the U.S. intelligence community told Newsmax about the selection of President Clinton’s former chief of staff, who has no experience with the intelligence community.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the new chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, was reportedly fuming that Obama picked Panetta without consulting with her. She issued a statement making it clear she preferred a career intelligence professional.

And veterans in the intelligence community are not going to be happy with Panetta’s selection either, the source disclosed.
“Intel careerists hate the idea. So does Senator Feinstein. This makes me think it could be a good appointment.

“The reason may be that Panetta may actually try to clean up the intel bureaucracy or at least hold it accountable.

“Panetta might be among the least objectionable Clintonites. It would be interesting to review his thoughts about the Lewinski affair. Did he back Obama or Hillary Clinton? If not Clinton, why not?”

The source added, “CIA careerists have been sticking it to the Bush administration for eight years. Maybe they will get what’s coming to them.
“One former CIA officer is so angry at this appointment, he told me his reaction in ‘unprintable.’”
Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., an outspoken critic of the CIA, expressed cautious optimism over Panetta’s selection.
The ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee had urged Obama to select a civilian for the post to signal a sharp break with the agency’s troubled past.

“Mr. Hoekstra has called for a new direction and change in the culture at the CIA for some time,” said spokesman Jamal Ware.

“Whether it’s Mr. Panetta or someone else, it is important that the agency move in a new direction.”

"In God We Trust" : Vote for America on NBC

Here is a site run by NBC taking a poll on whether or not to remove "In God We Trust" from our currency - to remove 'In God We Trust' from our coins and paper money is just another move on the left to drive Christianity out of our country and install socialism in it's place.

The liberal establishment wants us all to believe they are the only savior that we need. You decide!

I don't know if this will change anything but copy and paste the URL below then vote -

Keep the faith - In God WE do trust, not the Marxist socialists.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10103521/

Bush Rejects Israels Request to Attack Iranian Nuke Factory

We have to wonder just what Obama will do to stop the Iranians from completing and using a nuclear device. I'm sure Israel will be the first to find out if he is unsuccessful.

Keep the faith!

(Associated Press)

Bush Thwarted Israel's Iran Strike Plan
Saturday, January 10, 2009

WASHINGTON – President George W. Bush rejected a plea from Israel last year to help it raid Iran's main nuclear complex, opting instead to authorize a new U.S. covert action aimed at sabotaging Iran's suspected nuclear weapons program, The New York Times reported.

Israel's request was for specialized bunker-busting bombs that it wanted for an attack that tentatively involved flying over Iraq to reach Iran's major nuclear complex at Natanz, where the country's only known uranium enrichment plant is located, the Times reported Saturday in its online edition. The White House deflected requests for the bombs and flyover but said it would improve intelligence-sharing with Israel on covert U.S. efforts to sabotage Iran's nuclear program.

The covert efforts, which began in early 2008, involved plans to penetrate Iran's nuclear supply chain abroad and undermine electrical systems and other networks on which Iran relies, the Times said, citing interviews with current and former U.S. officials, outside experts and international nuclear inspectors who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The covert program will be handed off to President-elect Barack Obama, who will deciding whether to continue it.

According to the Times, Bush decided against an overt attack based on input from top administration officials such as Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who believed that doing so would likely prove ineffective and could ignite a broader Middle East war.

Israel made the push for permission to fly over Iraq for an attack on Iran following its anger over a U.S. intelligence assessment in late 2007 that concluded Iran had effectively suspended its development of nuclear weapons four years earlier. Israel sought to rebut the report, providing evidence to U.S. intelligence officials that they said indicated the Iranians were still working on a weapon.

Gordon Johndroe, spokesman for the National Security Council, declined to comment Saturday.

In an interview with The Associated Press earlier this week, Stephen Hadley, Bush's national security adviser, said he believed that Iran is the biggest challenge Obama will face in the Middle East and that more sanctions will be needed to force Tehran to forgo its nuclear ambitions and support for extremists. He said the Bush administration has been trying to "shore up and store up leverage" to bequeath to the Obama administration.

Last month, Obama suggested that a combination of economic incentives and tighter sanctions might work. Tehran rejected the proposal. Obama also has said he would pursue tough-minded diplomacy.

© 2009 Associated Press.

Sara Palin Interviewed : Sara "Talks Truth to Power"

Sara takes it to the liberal left wing media elites - she is on top of her program and I love the way she talks "Truth to Power". She is one of us.

Keep the faith and watch some of the interview on Youtube.com

Sarah Palin: Media Goes Easy on Kennedy
Thursday, January 8, 2009 7:23 PM

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin believes Caroline Kennedy is getting softer press treatment in her pursuit of the New York Senate seat than Palin did as the Republican vice-presidential nominee because of Kennedy’s social class.

“I’ve been interested to see how Caroline Kennedy will be handled and if she will be handled with kid gloves or if she will be under such a microscope,” Palin told conservative filmmaker John Ziegler during an interview Monday for his upcoming documentary film, “How Obama Got Elected.” Excerpts from the interview were posted on YouTube Wednesday evening.

“It’s going to be interesting to see how that plays out and I think that as we watch that we will perhaps be able to prove that there is a class issue here also that was such a factor in the scrutiny of my candidacy versus, say, the scrutiny of what her candidacy may be.”

Palin said she remains subject to unfair press coverage of her and her family.

“Is it political? Is it sexism?” she asked. “What is it that drives someone to believe the worst and perpetuate the worst in terms of gossip and lies?”

She observed that Katie Couric and Tina Fey have been “capitalizing on” and “exploiting” her.
“I did see that Tina Fey was named entertainer of the year and Katie Couric’s ratings have risen,” she said. “And I know that a lot of people are capitalizing on, oh I don’t know, perhaps some exploiting that was done via me, my family, my administration. That’s a little bit perplexing, but it also says a great deal about our society.”

The Alaska governor said that when she sees some of the coverage of her daughter Bristol especially “the momma grizzly rises up in me.”

Looking back on the Couric interviews, Palin said she knew things were not going well after their first session and asked the McCain campaign to pull the plug on the remaining sit downs but insisted the campaign made her go through with the rest.

“I knew it didn’t go well the first day, and then we gave her a couple of other segments after that. And my question to the campaign was, after it didn’t go well the first day, why were we going to go back for more?” she said. “Because of however it works in that upper echelon of power brokering in the media and with spokespersons, it was told to me that, yeah, we are going to go back for more. And going back for more was not a wise decision either.”

Palin criticized Couric for the way CBS “spliced it together,” saying that “so many of the topics brought up were not portrayed as accurately as they could have, should have, been.”

She also expressed frustration with Couric’s characterization of her since the interviews. After being shown a clip of Couric complaining to David Letterman that no post-election interviewer has asked Palin why she would not tell the CBS anchor what newspapers she reads, the Alaska governor responded: “Because, Katie, you’re not the center of everybody’s universe.”

New Pelosi Government Shuts Out Minority Rights

Who knew? Brother, this sure is a surprise!! The new head of the shadow government, Nancy Pelosi, that has come out of the darkness were she has be hiding and running an organization that is dedicated to stopping anything the Republicans try to accomplishment by legal or illegal means.

Witness the leaks in the New York Times, stark results of Democrat operatives in the CIA and the State Department leaking state secrets to embarrass George Bush. That these leaks have killed government agents or soldiers means little to Pelosi. After all, what's more important, national security or getting back into power?

She has decided to take control of the country by setting up new rules that will effectively close off debate and render the Republican minority powerless. She wants a complete lock on anything that she wants to accomplish. This, of course, means the Obama Chicago gang will not be a significant factor in how things get accomplished.

The conventional wisdom here is the congress can do what ever they want as the new president doesn't have a clue to what's going on. I believe this is true, but even so, given how Obama got elected and his Chicago background of gangland thugs and terrorists, and as things go in Chicago, out comes differ from those Pelosi is use to coming from San Fransisco. Maybe one morning Pelosi will wake up and find she has been fitted with a concrete overcoat and will be going 'swimming with the fishes'.

Is Obama powerless here? hmmm Time will tell, but in any event, the rules for minority rights that the Republicans set up when they took power in 1994 are about to go by the boards now that the Democrats are in power. This is just one more sign of the liberal grab for complete power to control all aspects of our lives.

Keep the faith - we are getting more reinforcements every day to do battle.


John Fund Blasts Speaker Pelosi on 'Reforms'
Friday, January 9, 2009
By: David A. Patten

The rule changes Speaker Nancy Pelosi is steamrolling through the House of Representatives contradict President-elect Barack Obama’s bipartisan promises, and also fly in the face of Pelosi’s own pledge to “insure the rights” of the minority party.

That’s the view of Wall Street Journal columnist and author John Fund, who documented Friday how Pelosi’s tune has changed in a bid to drown out the voices of Republican minority opposition in Congress.

The recent rule changes engineered by Pelosi, for example, end term limits for committee chairmanships. This is a major reversal of GOP reforms ushered in by the 1994 ”Contract With America.”

Term limits, Fund writes in a commentary titled “Pelosi Turns Back the Clock on House Reform,” helped “inject new ideas and merit into Congress.”

Pelosi’s rule changes partially restore the old Democratic, seniority-based system of chairmanships.

“Can this really be the ‘change’ that voters wanted last November?” Fund asks rhetorically. “Wags are already joking that Democrats are really delivering ‘senility you can believe in.’”

The rule changes passed Tuesday also severely restrict the legislative maneuver called a “motion to recommit” - a century-old maneuver that the minority party uses to send bills that reach the floor back to committees, where they can be endlessly debated.

GOP representatives used the tactic 50 times in the last session, mostly to stave off hidden tax hikes buried in larger bills.

Fund points out that Pelosi’s new rules sharply contradict positions she took before Democrats came to power. In 2004, Fund says, Pelosi rolled out a "Bill of Rights" to protect the interests of the party not in power.

"When we [Democrats] are shut out, they are shutting out the great diversity of America," Pelosi warned at the time. “We want a higher standard."

Just prior to becoming Speaker, Pelosi spoke of "bipartisanship" and her plans "to ensure the rights of the minority." Now that Democrats have consolidated their power, however, things are obviously different.

One of the ironies of Pelosi’s power grab, Fund points out, is that conservative “Blue Dog” Democrats are among the losers under the new rules because they often lack seniority.

Fund quotes Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, who observes: "All those nice pro-life, gun-owning young Democrats recruited to run by Rahm Emanuel will never have any real influence now. They were useful in getting Democrats a majority, but now they'll be in the back of the bus."

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Obama's Tax Plan Will Destroy American Dream for Generations

Obama's tax plan is one that will destroy our economy if he follows through on his campaign promises - but not only will he make all of pay more in taxes but we will pay more for fuel to run our cars and heat and cool our homes.

He plans to take our 401K's and eliminate the tax free investment of this plan or get rid of it altogether. Obama also wants to tax all sales on the Internet as well as hit garage sales.

What Obama wants is a country completely crushed under a huge federal government that will control all aspect of our lives. Hey, who voted for this guy in the first place?

Keep the faith


President Obama and the Coming Stock Market Crash

How destructive to the U.S. economy would a Barack Obama presidency be?
An exclusive Newsmax analysis warns: There could be a very rough time ahead.
Beneath Obama's flowery rhetoric lies a dangerous economic plan that will wreak havoc on the American economy.

Obama plans to return to the failed policies of high taxation coupled with an expansion of government spending.

Worse, Obama says he is absolutely committed to almost doubling the capital gains rate — something he will easily accomplish with a Democrat Congress.

In the coming months — when investors realize that Obama will raise the cap gains rate — there could be a stampede of asset sales as investors rush to take their profits now to avoid Obama's doubling of the tax rates next year.

Indeed, Obama makes no bones about his plans to go on a tax rampage. Not only would he increase the capital-gains tax rate from 15 percent to as much as 28 percent, he wants to allow the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts to expire in 2010, which effectively raises taxes on Americans by tens of billions of dollars.

He also wants to do away with the $102,000 FICA payroll tax cap, which means anyone making over $102,000 would pay an additional 7 percent in taxes on earned income.
And the loan dividend tax rate George Bush implemented? Under President Obama it will be DOA!

Rahm Emanuel Makes Millions As Investment Banker

This is what Obama calls 'change' and transparency in the 'new way' of government. Obama is showing us that he is no better than anyone else in Chicago. Who knew?

This is from NewsMax - Keep the faith!

Rahm Made Millions at Investment Bank

Congressional dealmaker and incoming White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel made millions of dollars brokering deals of another sort as an investment banker.
Emanuel was a fundraiser for Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, directed the Bill Clinton presidential campaign’s finance committee and was a senior adviser to Clinton in the White House, where he helped broker the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Congress.

But after he left his post in 1998, political friends helped him land a job with the investment banking firm Wasserstein Perella, and Emanuel made out nicely when the company was bought by investment bank Dresdner Kleinwort, Barron’s columnist Jim McTague reported.

Emanuel’s biggest deal was investment bank Goldner Rauner’s purchase of the alarm company SecurityLink from SBC Communications for $479 million in 2000. In what McTague calls “perhaps the greatest coup,” Emanuel convinced SBC to provide 80 percent of the funding for the purchase.

By the time Emanuel left the firm in January to prepare for what was to be a successful run for Congress, he had made $16.2 million in 2.5 years, The New York Times reported.
During his stint as an investment banker, Emanuel also helped utility company Unicom in an $82 billion merger with Peco Energy, which created Exelon, a utility with nearly $19 billion in annual revenue.

Exelon has 17 nuclear reactors, the most in the U.S., and McTague wonders if Emanuel will “recuse himself on nuclear-energy issues.”

Survey : Active Military Uncertain of Obama's Leadership

Given Obama's history and education, there isn't any reason for the active military to trust anything that our new president has to say.

With Obama's history and experience, he has no experience with anything military other than being associated with the Chicago thugs in ACORN, which everyone knew about before the election, with the underbelly of Chicago political corruption, and his association with the 'urban terrorist' organization, ACORN, where is the rocket science that seems to be needed to figure out that Obama is not here for us.

Even during the campaign he said all along he wanted to 'change' America to a more 'inclusive and fair' society, that is, level the playing field by taking from the productive and give to unproductive. He stated that he would go over seas and talk sense to our enemies - he stated something to the effect, ' we need to be more up-front with who we are, and after I explain to them that we mean no harm, the hatred that now exist for America all over the world will not exist. We need not solve these problems by force of arms.'

Little wonder the active military has one eye on their backs when they go to work. Obama did not hide his preference for Islamist terrorists, as most democrats do, as he never hid his distaste for the military or America itself. Evidence the lack of a flag pin on lapel or holding his hand over his heart or saying the pledge to the flag of our great country when he was on the campaign trail. Obama does not like this country as it is or how it has been for the last 250 years.

Socialism is the new trend now as witnessed by over sixty million people voting for him in November.
are all these people ignorant or just don't care anymore about anything except 'what's in it for me". Obama's background, and his vision for the future of this country, is not lost on the military.

Keep the faith - we have the best military in the world - thank God!!

NewsMax Article

Respondents to the survey of more than 1,900 active-duty subscribers to Army Times, Air Force Times, Navy Times and Marine Corps Times newspapers say much of the uncertainty lies in Obama's lack of military service and experience in leadership abilities.

"Being that the Marine Corps can be sent anywhere in the world with the snap of his fingers, nobody has confidence in this guy as commander in chief," one lance corporal who asked not to be identified said in a follow up interview with The Times.

Other issues causing uncertainty among the ranks are Obama’s stated 16-month timetable for pulling combat troops out of Iraq and his call to end the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy to allow gays to serve openly in the military.

Half of all respondents say they disapprove of Obama’s plan to withdraw troops from Iraq within 16 months of taking office on Jan. 20. A slightly higher percent say they support the plan to leave the country by the end of 2011.

The survey shows eight out of 10 respondents say the U.S. should have gone to war in Afghanistan and express optimism the U.S. will succeed there. A majority support plans to boost the number of troops in Afghanistan, while 30 percent say troops will need to stay for more than a decade to achieve its goals.

A higher percentage of respondents say outgoing President George W. Bush has their best interests at heart over Obama. Nearly half described their political views as conservative or very conservative. Slightly more than half said they consider themselves Republicans, 22 percent independents and 13 percent Democrats.

One-third of respondents say they are optimistic about the newly elected president, including eight out of 10 black service members.

The survey notes that responses are not representative of the opinions of the military as a whole, and that the survey group overall under-represents minorities, women and junior enlisted service members, and over-represents soldiers.

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

New Clock Watches Obama's Remaining Time in Office

If you ever wonder how much time is left before Obama leaves office, check this site out and you will know to the second -


Click here: My New clock