I find it almost impossible to believe that Leon Panetta will, in any sense, be good for the CIA - given his background with the Clintons, and that he is a liberal like most everyone associated with Obama or the Clintons, why wouldn't he use the CIA to build an agency that will be used by the Democrat National Committee to undermine any conservative attempts protect this country from foreign influence. Liberal Democrats look to high profile socialists for inspiration on population control.
Remember socialism is about control of populations by intimidation and fear and what better way of doing that then with people that have the inside intelligence on how to do that, i.e. the CIA.
It isn't lost on most of us that the liberal Democrats love foreign tyrants that use their power to crush opposition with violence in any form. Hugo Chavez in Venezuela , Kim in North Korea, Castro and his brother in Cuba and Putin in Russia to mention only a few. Witness the big wet kisses that Jimmy Carter gave Chavez when Jimmy lied about election fraud in Venezuela. Socialist liberals all.
Also, why wouldn't he use his power to hire people that would be sympathetic to his way of thinking when it comes to attacking a Republican administration like they did George Bush's. Isn't this standard procedure for Democrats? If this is only part of the Democrat agenda to "change" America, then why not use the FBI as well. They can work together - it worked great in the old Soviet Union for awhile, remember.
Given what happened last November 4th, it can happen here as well. Oh, wait - they have already done this with fifty years of Democrat control of congress. Just think about all of the people in the State Department and the courts that are under the thumb of the DNC. Bad people, nah - just good liberal Democrats.
What a plus for the DNC, though, to have a man on the inside of such an agency as the CIA - if the conservatives ever win another election, the DNC can use loyal troops buried deep in the agency to leak information to embarrass or crush a conservative administration, like they did to George Bush. Is this a shadow government at work? Maybe.
The only thing we can "hope" for is all those that voted for freedom last November will rise up and demand common sense. Now that is real "hope we can believe in".
Keep the faith.
Some in D.C. Pleased With Panetta Pick
Critics have voiced dismay and even anger over President-elect Barack Obama’s choice of Leon Panetta as the new CIA director — but not everyone in Washington is distressed with the decision.
“I actually think Panetta is a good choice,” a source in the U.S. intelligence community told Newsmax about the selection of President Clinton’s former chief of staff, who has no experience with the intelligence community.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the new chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, was reportedly fuming that Obama picked Panetta without consulting with her. She issued a statement making it clear she preferred a career intelligence professional.
And veterans in the intelligence community are not going to be happy with Panetta’s selection either, the source disclosed.
“Intel careerists hate the idea. So does Senator Feinstein. This makes me think it could be a good appointment.
“The reason may be that Panetta may actually try to clean up the intel bureaucracy or at least hold it accountable.
“Panetta might be among the least objectionable Clintonites. It would be interesting to review his thoughts about the Lewinski affair. Did he back Obama or Hillary Clinton? If not Clinton, why not?”
The source added, “CIA careerists have been sticking it to the Bush administration for eight years. Maybe they will get what’s coming to them.
“One former CIA officer is so angry at this appointment, he told me his reaction in ‘unprintable.’”
Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., an outspoken critic of the CIA, expressed cautious optimism over Panetta’s selection.
The ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee had urged Obama to select a civilian for the post to signal a sharp break with the agency’s troubled past.
“Mr. Hoekstra has called for a new direction and change in the culture at the CIA for some time,” said spokesman Jamal Ware.
“Whether it’s Mr. Panetta or someone else, it is important that the agency move in a new direction.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment