Barack Obama has no intention of defending the American destiny of providing a chance for freedom and Democracy for everyone under the boot of oppression. What Obama wants is to be wearing that boot and have it firmly planted on the neck of anyone that won't conform to his socialist agenda. His entire history points to this as his reason for existence.
As more information comes to light about who Barack Obama is, we get a clearer picture of his Chicago activities from the very beginning which shaped his rise to power. Stark among the new findings is he sought out Bill Ayres, the terrorist, and not Bill Ayers going to Obama. His intentions all along, from the get-go, were purely socialist, if not completely Marxist.
Obama sought out Ayers to get a foot hold in the radical community that he knew he would need to advance his agenda of socialism. Obama read Saul Alinsky's book on terrorism.
Obama used ACORN for the same reasons - he knew they were corrupt but he knew as well that this would work for him to as a community organizer in urban Chicago, an area ripe for 'change' - this man is no fool.
Obama used ACORN to intimidate banks and then congress to allow low risk home loans to individuals without jobs and or even illegals without jobs and no social security numbers. This was completely supported by all of the Democrats in congress and they went so far as to make it illegal NOT to make loans to risky individuals. When banks complained they would lose money, the Democrats ordered Fannie and Freddie, that is tax payer money, to back these bad high risk loans. This all started in the late 90's with Bill Clinton, Janet Reno, Jammie Gorlick Chirs Dodd, Barine Frank, Schumer and other Democrats.
As it wound up, the disaster that we have now, investigators found that over 50% of the loan documents that are held by Fannie and Freddie were high risk. It was also found that over 5 million of these loans are individuals that do not have jobs and no social security numbers or false social security numbers on the applications.
When Fannie and Freddie came under fire and were fined for fraud in their booking keeping, bigger bonuses for Raines and Gorlick, Franklin Reines, Democrat, was fired, Fannie and Freddie fined Billions but nobody made any effort to change the way things were done except the Republicans.
The Democrats to the man and woman, Gorlick, defended the two institutions as being sound. They screamed the Republicans were trying to deny the poor the same rights as the rich. This oversight was saugh by the Bush Administration in 2003, 2005, John McCain and Bush, 2006, 2007 and 2008. In all the Republicans tried 17 times to bring 'oversight' to these financial monsters. No luck! Why? Democrats!
Barack Obama will attack foreign policy in the same manner as Peters points out in this article - Obama has no intention of standing up against aggression from oppressive nations that want to gain new territory, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, really any communist socialist tyrant as this is an Obama quest for himself, or those nations that want to take back lost countries - lost to freedom and Democracy, Russia. Jimmy Carter just loves these guys.I believe Obama will do nothing to defend Israel or any other country that faces attack from a Muslin dominated countries. He will not defend Iraq. The Democrats abandoned the Vietnamese. Remember, Obama is not about helping the oppressed, i.e. the Palestinians, he is about joining the oppressors.
Keep the faith, the struggle goes on!
AMERICA THE WEAK
By RALPH PETERS
/October 20, 2008/ --
http://www.nypost.com/news/p/obama_barack/obama_barack.htm
IF Sen. Barack Obama is elected president, our republic will survive, but our international strategy and some of our allies may not. His first year in office would conjure globe-spanning challenges as our enemies piled on to exploit his weakness. Add in Sen. Joe Biden - with his track record of calling every major foreign-policy crisis wrong for 35 years - as vice president and /de facto/ secretary of State, and we'd face a formula for strategic disaster.
Where would the avalanche of confrontations come from?*
Al Qaeda
Pandering to his extreme base, Obama has projected an image of being soft on terror. Toss in his promise to abandon Iraq, and you can be sure that al Qaeda will pull out all the stops to kill as many Americans as possible - in Iraq, Afghanistan and, if they can, here at home - hoping that America will throw away the victories our troops bought with their blood.*
Pakistan
As this nuclear-armed country of 170 million anti-American Muslims grows more fragile by the day, the save-the-Taliban elements in the Pakistani intelligence services and body politic will avoid taking serious action against "their" terrorists (while theatrically annoying Taliban elements they can't control). The Pakistanis think Obama would lose Afghanistan - and they believe they can reap the subsequent whirlwind.*
Iran
Got nukes? If the Iranians are as far along with their nuclear program as some reports insist, expect a mushroom cloud above an Iranian test range next year. Even without nukes, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would try the new administration's temper in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf.*
Israel
In the Middle East, Obama's election would be read as the /end/ of staunch US support for Israel. Backed by Syria and Iran, Hezbollah would provoke another, far-bloodier war with Israel. Lebanon would disintegrate.*
Saudi Arabia
Post-9/11 attention to poisonous Saudi proselytizing forced the kingdom to be more discreet in fomenting terrorism and religious hatred abroad. Convinced that Obama will be more "tolerant" toward militant Islam, the Saudis would redouble their funding of bigotry and butchery-for-Allah - in the US, too.*
Russia
Got Ukraine? Not for long, /slabiye Amerikantsi/. Russia's new czar, Vladimir Putin, intends to gobble Ukraine next year, assured that NATO will be divided and the US can be derided. Aided by the treasonous Kiev politico Yulia Timoshenko - a patriot when it suited her ambition, but now a Russian collaborator - the Kremlin is set to reclaim the most important state it still regards as its property. Overall, 2009 may see the starkest repression of freedom since Stalin seized Eastern Europe.*
Georgia
Our Georgian allies should dust off their Russian dictionaries.*
Venezuela
Hugo Chavez will intensify the rape of his country's hemorrhaging democracy and, despite any drop in oil revenue, he'll do all he can to export his megalomaniacal version of gun-barrel socialism. He'll seek a hug-for-the-cameras meet with President Obama as early as possible.*
Bolivia
Chavez client President Evo Morales could order his military to seize control of his country's dissident eastern provinces, whose citizens resist his repression, extortion and semi-literate Leninism. President Obama would do nothing as yet another democracy toppled and bled.*
North Korea
North Korea will expect a much more generous deal from the West for annulling its pursuit of nuclear weapons. And it will regard an Obama administration as a green light to cheat.
NATO
The brave young democracies of Central and Eastern Europe will be gravely discouraged, while the appeasers in Western Europe will again have the upper hand. Putin will be allowed to do what he wants.*
The Kurds
An Obama administration will abandon our only true allies between Tel Aviv and Tokyo.*
Democracy activists
Around the world, regressive regimes will intensify their suppression - and outright murder - of dissidents who risk their lives for freedom and justice. An Obama administration will say all the right things, but do nothing.*
Women's rights
If you can't vote in US elections, sister, you're screwed. Being stoned to death or buried alive is just a cultural thing.*
Journalists
American journalists who've done everything they can to elect Barack Obama can watch as regimes around the world imprison, torture and murder their foreign colleagues, confident that the US has entered an era of impotence. The crocodile tears in newsrooms will provide drought relief to the entire southeastern US.
Sen. John McCain's campaign has allowed a great man to be maligned as a mere successor to George W. Bush. The truth is that an Obama administration would be a second Carter presidency - only far worse.Think Bush weakened America? Just wait.
Ralph Peters' latest book is "Looking for Trouble: Adventures in a Broken World."Home
No comments:
Post a Comment