Saturday, February 13, 2016

Objma's ObjmaCare's "Covered California" : A tragic & Systematic Failure

This below is unconfirmed even though the site pointed to where this information came from is really Covered Ca. But taken in it's entirety, this 'testimonial' is interesting and does ring many bells of how ObjmaCare is only a tool used by the progressive socialist liberals to slowly but surly take control of our society with the "fundamental change" promised by Mr Objma.
And given the hard facts that we all know to be true now as "we have found out what's in ObjmaCare", curtesy of Nancy Pelosi's statement before only the democrats voted for it, the facts ring true as to the total failure that is ObjmaCare.
But if the truth be known, it isn't a failure at all, it is working as designed.
(Author Unknown)
I'm a 54 year old consulting  engineer and make between $60,000 and $125,000 per year,  depending on how hard I work and whether or not there are work projects out there for me.  My girlfriend is 61 and makes about $18,000 per year, working as  a part-time mail clerk. 
For me, making $60,000 a year, under  ObamaCare, the cheapest, lowest grade policy I can buy,  which also happens to impose a $5,000 deductible, costs $482  per month. 
For my girlfriend, the same exact  policy, same deductible, costs $1 per month. That's  right, $1 per month. I'm not making this up.  Don't believe me? Just go  to http://www.coveredca.gov/,  the ObamaCare website for Ca., and enter the parameters  I've mentioned above and see for yourself.
By the way,  my zip code is 93940. You'll need to enter that.  So OK, clearly ObamaCare is a scheme that involves putting the cost burden of healthcare onto the middle and upper-income  wage  earners.
And before I make my next points,  I'd like you to think about something:  I  live in Monterey County, in Central Ca. We have a large land  mass but just 426,000 residents - about the population of  Colorado Springs or the city of Omaha.  But we do have a large Hispanic  population, including a large number of illegal aliens, and  to serve this group we have Natividad Medical Center, a  massive, Federally subsidized county medical complex that  takes up an area about one-third the size of the Chrysler Corp. assembly plant in Belvedere, Illinois.  
Natividad has state-of-the-art  operating rooms, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance  Imaging, fully equipped, 24 hr ER, and much  more. If  you have no insurance, if you've been in a drive-by  shooting or have overdosed on crack cocaine, this is where  you go. And it's essentially free, because almost  everyone who ends up in the ER is uninsured. Last yr, 2,735 babies were born at  Natividad. 32% of these were born to out-of-wedlock teenage  mothers, 93% of which were Hispanic.  Less than 20% could demonstrate  proof of citizenship, and 71% listed their native language  as Spanish. Of these 876 births, only 40 were covered under  [any kind of] private health insurance. The taxpayers paid  for the other 836. 
And in case you were wondering about the entire population in this area - all 2,735 births - less than 24% involved insured coverage or even partial payment on behalf of the patient to the hospital in exchange for services.
Now consider this: If I want  to upgrade my policy to a low-deductible premium policy,  such as what I had with my last employer, my cost is $886  per month.  But my girlfriend can upgrade her  policy to the very same level, for just $4 per  month.  That's right, $4 per month.  $48 per year for a zero-deductible, premium healthcare  policy - the kind of thing you get when you work at IBM  (except of course, IBM employees pay an average of $170 per  month out of pocket for their coverage).  I  mean, it's bad enough that I will be forced to subsidize  the ObamaCare scheme in the first place. But even if I  agreed with the basic scheme, which of course I do not, I  would never agree to subsidize premium policies.  If  I have to pay $482 a month for a budget policy, I sure as  hell do not want the guy I'm subsidizing to get a better policy, for less than 1% of what I have to fork out each  month for a low-end policy.  Why must I pay $482 per month for  something the other guy gets for a dollar?  And why should the other guy get  to buy an $886 policy for $4 a month? 
Think about this: I have to pay  $10,632 a year for the same thing that the other guy can get  for $48.  $10,000 of net income is 60 days of full time work as an engineer; $48 is something I could  make collecting aluminum cans and plastic bottles, one day a  month. 
Are you with me on this? Are you  starting to get an idea what ObamaCare is really  about? 
ObamaCare is not about dealing  with inequities in the healthcare system. That's just  the cover story.  The real story is that it is a massive, political power grab.  Do you think anyone who can insure himself with a premium  policy for $4 a month will vote for anyone but the political  party that provides him such a deal?  ObamaCare is about enabling,  subsidizing, and expanding the Left's political power  base, at taxpayer expense.  Why would I vote for anyone but a  Democrat if I can have babies for $4 a month?  For that matter, why would I go to  college or strive for a better job or income if it means I  have to pay real money for healthcare coverage? Heck, why  study engineering when I can be a schlub for $20K per year  and buy a new F-150 with all the money I'm  saving?  And think about those $4-a-month  babies - think in terms of propagation models. Think of just  how many babies will be born to irresponsible, under-educated mothers. Will we get a new crop of brain  surgeons and particle physicists from the dollar baby club,  or will we need more cops, criminal courts and  prisons?  One thing you can be certain of:  At $4 a month, they'll multiply, and multiply, and  multiply. 
ObamaCare: It's all about income redistribution and multiplying political power.
 
 

No comments: