Just like the old tail about if you remove the main from a lion, he will no longer be a lion. Or remove the spots from a leopard he will then be just a big cat.
Mr Objma and the other progressive socialist liberal democrats are who they are, and always have been, and no amount of soothing words can change that. History is riff with examples of political treachery committed by democrats, but it's just that now the amount of treachery and the severity is so much worse that it threatens our way of life.
The progressive socialists believe there time is now, especially with Objma as president, to do what they have always believed their right of passage, and as Mr Objma has promised, to "fundamentally change America".
It doesn't take rocket science to understand Mr Objma and what he means by "fundamental change" for America if the voting public has been awake over the last 7 years, Mr Objma is a progressive socialist at the least or if the truth be known, much much worse.
Here's question I would like answered, if Mr Objma regrets his past history, does he regret the reason he changed his name?
Of course, it seem plain to see that a majority of voters are not awake but sound asleep and have no intentions of waking up, that is until their sleepy world of denials is disrupted by reality and by then all will be lost.
Obama the Obstructionist
Katrina Trinko / @KatrinaTrinko
What a shock. Now that he’s at the White House—and facing GOP opposition to appointing a new Supreme Court justice in the mere months before a new president is elected—President Barack Obama seems to have changed his tune a decade after serving as a U.S. senator.
As we detail in this video, Obama used to think it was appropriate for senators (including himself) to block judicial nominees. In fact, he filibustered Justice Samuel Alito’s confirmation to the Supreme Court along with circuit court nominees Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor, and Leslie Southwick.
But White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Wednesday that Obama sees things a little differently now. Speaking about filibustering Alito’s nomination, Earnest said, per The Hill, “That is an approach the president regrets.”
https://youtu.be/0BazcDd-yG8
It took only 3,670 days for Obama to reach this conclusion. No doubt that doesn’t have anything to do with the fact that he’s now in the White House and the GOP controls the U.S. Senate.
Watch the video above to see then-Sen. Obama’s own words on judicial nominees. And then check out the one below of Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., another liberal politician who was singing a different tune when George W. Bush was president.
https://youtu.be/I5Zy2Bul_WY
Mr Objma and the other progressive socialist liberal democrats are who they are, and always have been, and no amount of soothing words can change that. History is riff with examples of political treachery committed by democrats, but it's just that now the amount of treachery and the severity is so much worse that it threatens our way of life.
The progressive socialists believe there time is now, especially with Objma as president, to do what they have always believed their right of passage, and as Mr Objma has promised, to "fundamentally change America".
It doesn't take rocket science to understand Mr Objma and what he means by "fundamental change" for America if the voting public has been awake over the last 7 years, Mr Objma is a progressive socialist at the least or if the truth be known, much much worse.
Here's question I would like answered, if Mr Objma regrets his past history, does he regret the reason he changed his name?
Of course, it seem plain to see that a majority of voters are not awake but sound asleep and have no intentions of waking up, that is until their sleepy world of denials is disrupted by reality and by then all will be lost.
Obama the Obstructionist
Katrina Trinko / @KatrinaTrinko
What a shock. Now that he’s at the White House—and facing GOP opposition to appointing a new Supreme Court justice in the mere months before a new president is elected—President Barack Obama seems to have changed his tune a decade after serving as a U.S. senator.
As we detail in this video, Obama used to think it was appropriate for senators (including himself) to block judicial nominees. In fact, he filibustered Justice Samuel Alito’s confirmation to the Supreme Court along with circuit court nominees Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor, and Leslie Southwick.
But White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Wednesday that Obama sees things a little differently now. Speaking about filibustering Alito’s nomination, Earnest said, per The Hill, “That is an approach the president regrets.”
https://youtu.be/0BazcDd-yG8
It took only 3,670 days for Obama to reach this conclusion. No doubt that doesn’t have anything to do with the fact that he’s now in the White House and the GOP controls the U.S. Senate.
Watch the video above to see then-Sen. Obama’s own words on judicial nominees. And then check out the one below of Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., another liberal politician who was singing a different tune when George W. Bush was president.
https://youtu.be/I5Zy2Bul_WY
No comments:
Post a Comment