If you are student of history at all or just have even the smallest ability to understand finances, it becomes readily apparent that Bernie is not an independent senator but a total socialist, or what I call a 'neo-communist'.
Now I know using that term is outrageous in America as we know that anyone that lives in this country and enjoys all of the benefits that America promises, under our Constitution, which affords every individual the right to the pursuit of happiness without a government overseeing what you do or want, right?
But given the rhetoric from Bernie, and if you know his past history which is steeped is the socialist agenda, he is not just an independent socialist but a full acknowledged supporter of the communist manifesto which states, and he shamelessly refers to this in every speech he makes about what the population must do to make sure all citizens have the same benefits that everyone else has, no matter their place in life. It's also the big tent theory that covers everyone. Mr Objma's big tent was "the life of Julia".
Fundamentall change anyone? Transformation the new wave? The new norm?
The communist manifesto states clearly "from each according to their abilities and to each according to their needs". Doesn't Bernie's message have that certain ring to it that opens the door for all to come and be welcomed into the arms of the all powerful government that will give you everything no matter if you earned it or not? Come one, come all, everything is free. Others will pay the price.
But on the flip side as the saying goes, 'the government that is big enough to give you everything is big enough to take everything away from you as well'. Something to think about.
No comments:
Post a Comment