Or is Mr Objma cultivating new ground by his ideology of progressive socialist fundamental change to our society? Or worse then fundamental change, a forced radical change like in centuries past?
But his isn't a new agenda or ideology as the democrats in our past are responsible for the deaths of millions in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam when they pulled the funding from the south forcing the country to collapse under the attack from the north and the Khmer Rouge under Pol Pot in Cambodia to purge, commit genocide, and murder more then 2.8 million people.
The democrats did this as well for politics. The North was on their last legs as told in his book by the North Vietnamese General Gap, but were saved by the students and democrats that couldn't allow Nixon a victory.
Why should Mr Objam be seen as any different then the democrats from the past?
No comments:
Post a Comment