This is puzzling in that the South Africans can see what has taken place in so many other African countries that have decided to take absolute power as the center policy of their government's agenda.
And yet South Africa appears to be taking the same path to self destruction. Why is that?
What is telling as well, a reporter from Kenya stated back in 2008 that Barrrack Ogbjma was no better then an ''African Colonel''. Why would she say this? What did she see a decade ago that virtually no one else did?
Is there really no way to escape the grip of absolute power for people that believe they are ''The ones'' to make the plunge without consequence? Transformation of civil society from independence to dependence was in force for eight years in America. The country plunged into decline. Now South Africa plunges into self destruction.
Was it Ronald Reagan that said that the loss of freedom is only one election away?
And yet South Africa appears to be taking the same path to self destruction. Why is that?
What is telling as well, a reporter from Kenya stated back in 2008 that Barrrack Ogbjma was no better then an ''African Colonel''. Why would she say this? What did she see a decade ago that virtually no one else did?
Is there really no way to escape the grip of absolute power for people that believe they are ''The ones'' to make the plunge without consequence? Transformation of civil society from independence to dependence was in force for eight years in America. The country plunged into decline. Now South Africa plunges into self destruction.
Was it Ronald Reagan that said that the loss of freedom is only one election away?
South Africa Will Go the Way of Zimbabwe If It Doesn’t Change Course
South Africa has been thrown into the news because of President Donald Trump’s recent tweet that he instructed his secretary of state to “closely study” alleged land seizures from white farmers in South Africa.
Earlier this year, a land confiscation motion was brought by radical Marxist opposition leader Julius Malema, and it passed South Africa’s Parliament by a 241-83 vote.
Malema has had a long-standing commitment to land confiscation without compensation. In 2016, he told his supporters he was “not calling for the slaughter of white people—at least for now.”
The land-grabbing sentiment is also expressed by Lindsay Maasdorp, national spokesman for Black First Land First, a group that condones land seizures in South Africa. He says, “We are going to take back the land, and we’ll do it by any means necessary.” The land confiscation policy was a key factor in the platform of the new president, Cyril Ramaphosa.
I have visited South Africa several times, in 1979, 1980, and 1992. My three-month 1980 visit included lectures at nearly all South African universities. The 1992 return visit, two years after apartheid ended and two years before democratic elections, included lectures on my book “South Africa’s War Against Capitalism.”
During each visit, my counsel to South Africans, particularly black South Africans, was that the major task before them was not only ridding the nation of apartheid but deciding what was going to replace it.
That’s an important question. William Hutt, the late University of Cape Town economist who was an anti-apartheid voice within the academic community, wrote in his 1964 book, titled “The Economics of the Colour Bar,” that one of the supreme tragedies of the human condition is that those who have been the victims of injustices or oppression “can often be observed to be inflicting not dissimilar injustices upon other races.”
South African Farmer Reports on What Is Really Happening in His Country Regarding Land Seizure
In 2001, Andrew Kenny wrote an article titled “Black People Aren’t Animals—But That’s How Liberals Treat Them.” Kenny asked whether South Africa is doomed to follow the rest of Africa into oblivion. Kenny gave a “no” answer to his question, but he was not very optimistic because of the pattern seen elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa.
He argued that ordinary Africans were better off under colonialism. Colonial masters never committed anything near the murder and genocide seen under black rule in Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, Nigeria, Mozambique, Somalia, and other countries, where millions of blacks have been slaughtered in unspeakable ways, including being hacked to death, boiled in oil, set on fire, and dismembered. Kenny said that if as many elephants, zebras, and lions were as ruthlessly slaughtered, the world’s leftists would be in a tizzy.
Ghanaian economist George Ayittey expressed a similar complaint in his book “Africa Betrayed”: “White rulers in South Africa could be condemned, but not black African leaders guilty of the same political crimes.”
Moeletsi Mbeki, a brother of former South African President Thabo Mbeki’s and deputy chairman of the South African Institute of International Affairs, an independent think tank based at the University of the Witwatersrand, said in 2004 that Africa was in a spiral of decline. “The average African is poorer than during the age of colonialism,” he said.
Zimbabwe, South Africa’s northern neighbor formerly called Rhodesia, was southern Africa’s breadbasket. That was prior to the confiscation of nearly 6,000 large white-owned commercial farms during the 1990s. By the turn of the century, Zimbabwe was threatened with mass starvation and was begging for food.
Added to that tragedy, Zimbabwe experienced history’s second-highest inflation rate. It reached 79.6 billion percent in mid-November 2008. (In 1946, Hungary experienced the world’s highest inflation rate, 41.9 quadrillion percent.)
South Africa leads in mining, food production, and critical infrastructure, such as power production and railroading, in southern Africa. But it’s going the same way as Zimbabwe, spelling disaster for the entire southern part of Africa.
What’s needed most right now is for South Africans to adopt some of the principles enunciated by Nelson Mandela, one of which is, “You will achieve more in this world through acts of mercy than you will through acts of retribution.”
No comments:
Post a Comment