One of the best statements that Facebooks Sandberg said that is the grist of this discussion, they relied on ''third party fact checkers'' for content ratings.
They took an oath. Yikes! 'See, it's those other people that attacked Conservatives content.'
Just imagine having Politifact check your content if you are a Conservative. Politifact is progressive and liberal, their history has proven them biased.
This is crazy. Social media and their fact checkers are progressive liberals. You can remove the spots form a Leopard but guess what is left is still a Leopard.
This is not news - this is ''fact'' and Politifact has been taken to task for it. But guess what, they don't care. What hoot!! Politifact uses their ''truth-O -Meter'' for fact checking what is fake news when in fact the 'truth O meter is just a tool, a club to beat Conservative content to dust.
Goodness. Is there a good reason to believe anything they said? Or what they explain how they are in process of making changes to bring a better product to the market? Are these people ethical or moral given their history of political corruption? Really??
Come on, they are progressive socialsit liberal democrats! And also given that nearly every newspaper, television station is controlled by progressive liberal democrats, as well as most universities and secondary educational systems in the country, why would the social media companies be any different?
They took an oath. Yikes! 'See, it's those other people that attacked Conservatives content.'
Just imagine having Politifact check your content if you are a Conservative. Politifact is progressive and liberal, their history has proven them biased.
This is crazy. Social media and their fact checkers are progressive liberals. You can remove the spots form a Leopard but guess what is left is still a Leopard.
This is not news - this is ''fact'' and Politifact has been taken to task for it. But guess what, they don't care. What hoot!! Politifact uses their ''truth-O -Meter'' for fact checking what is fake news when in fact the 'truth O meter is just a tool, a club to beat Conservative content to dust.
Goodness. Is there a good reason to believe anything they said? Or what they explain how they are in process of making changes to bring a better product to the market? Are these people ethical or moral given their history of political corruption? Really??
Come on, they are progressive socialsit liberal democrats! And also given that nearly every newspaper, television station is controlled by progressive liberal democrats, as well as most universities and secondary educational systems in the country, why would the social media companies be any different?
6 Key Moments From Social Media Hearings
On Capitol Hill Wednesday, Facebook’s chief operating officer and Twitter’s CEO testified about foreign entities and the use of social media platforms to influence the United States’ elections.
Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg and Twitter’s Jack Dorsey answered questions from the Senate intelligence committee on topics including foreign influences and “fake news.”
Dorsey also appeared before the Energy and Commerce Committee Wednesday afternoon to discuss Twitter’s transparency and accountability.
Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Larry Page, chairman of Google’s parent company Alphabet, declined the Senate intelligence committee’s invitation to attend and testify at the meeting, according to Fox News.
President Donald Trump recently tweeted harsh criticism of Google, tweeting on Aug. 28 that the platform is “rigged” in its showing of conservative news and “Trump news” in searches.
Here are six takeaways from the hearings.
A Promise to Combat ‘Fake News’
Sandberg told senators Wednesday during the Senate intelligence committee hearing that her company is working to eradicate fake news from Facebook. “I think we have learned a lot, and I think we are going to have to continue to learn because as we learn, our opponents learn and we keep up,” Sandberg said, adding:
''We are working on technology and investments in people, making sure fake news is disseminated less on the platforms, transparency in actions in taking down bad actors, and we have seen everywhere from Mexico to Brazil to other places around the world these same techniques deployed differently and each time we see it, I think we get smarter. I think we see the new threat and we are able to connect the dots and prevent those threats going forward.
Defining Twitter’s Nonpartisan Stance
Dorsey, in the House hearing before the Energy and Commerce Committee, said Twitter does not favor one party affiliation over another. “I want to start by making something very clear: We don’t consider political viewpoints, perspectives, or party affiliation in any of our policies or enforcement decisions,” Dorsey said. “Period.”
He said impartiality is the guiding standard of Twitter because users and observers “gather from all around the world to see what’s happening and to have a conversation about what they see.”
Monitoring Activity and Content From Harmful Countries
Sandberg said her company has been successful in taking down international accounts that could pose harm. “Just two weeks ago we took down 650 pages and accounts from Iran, some were tied to state-owned media, and some were pretending to be free press, but they weren’t free press, and so it depends how you define a hoax, but I think we are certainly seeing them misuse information campaigns,” Sandberg said.
Eliminate Fake Content and Accounts
Facebook is working to eliminate all fake accounts and content on its site, Sandberg said.
“We believe that at any point in time it was 3 to 4 percent of accounts [which are fake],” she said.
“In the short run or over the long run, it doesn’t benefit us to have anything inauthentic on our platform,” she added.
Preventing Conservative Bias
Dorsey told the House Energy and Commerce Committee Wednesday afternoon that Twitter is working to correct what led to the alleged shadow banning of some prominent conservatives on Twitter. Shadow banning refers to situations where an account isn’t banned but Twitter makes it harder to find the account and/or the tweets posted by the account.
“We use signals, usually hundreds of signals, to determine and to decide what to show, what to down rank, or potentially what to filter,” Dorsey said. “In this particular case, as I mentioned in my opening, we were using a signal of the behavior of the people following accounts, and we didn’t believe upon further consideration—and also seeing the impact which was about 600,000 accounts, pretty broad-based—that that was ultimately fair and we decided to correct it.”
Dorsey said the process continues to evolve, but his company wants to be judged on fairness. “We also decided it was not fair to use a signal for filtering in general,” Dorsey said, adding:
''It is important for us to, one, be able to experiment freely with these signals and to have the freedom to be able to inject them and also to remove them, ’cause that is the only way we are going to learn. We will make mistakes along the way and the way we want to be judged is making sure that we recognize those and that we correct them.
Continuing Education for Greater Social Media Best Practices
Sandberg said Facebook is working to implement practices and programs to better serve and educate users on how the platform works.
“We have worked on media literacy programs, we have worked on programs and public service announcements around the world that help people determine if this is real news or not and help people be educated,” she said. “I think one of the most important things we’re doing is that once a piece of content has been rated as false by our third-party fact-checkers, if you are about to share it, we warn you … and so you are educated as you are about to take that critical step.”
No comments:
Post a Comment