As we all know, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are the third rail of politics which, even a hint that reform might cause some voters to have to make changes in their personal lives, is out of the question.
Politicians do not have the stomach to make the hard decision or political will as ideology and agenda which drives the mind set for getting votes, will not allow them to solve the Social Security problem.
As usual in progressive politics, it just easier to let others, some time in the future, do the heavy lifting. For now, it's 'take the money and run', keep the votes coming our way, keep the money flowing even though we are broke and going further in debt.
And when it all comes to a disastrous end, and it will, it's enviable, the checks will stop going out, the progressive socialist that brought us the problem will always have a 'straw man' to roll out as the reason for the failure, the Republicans and Conservatives that wouldn't help us democrats to solve the problem when it needed to fixed.
That it will be a bold face lie is of now consequence, this tactic has been used for decades by democrats and it has worked every time. And given our political atmosphere that exists of our 'right' to free stuff, it will keep on working, for now.
Infinite Social Security Solvency Projections
Source: "2015 Technical Panel on Assumption Methods," Social Security Advisory Board, September 2015.
October 8, 2015
The 2015 Technical Panel on Assumptions and Methods reviewed the assumptions specified by the Board of Trustees and to evaluate the methods used by the Office of the Chief Actuary to project the future financial status of the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds.
Social Security's actuaries and Trustees have an enormously difficult task — projecting demographic and economic developments over the next 75 years and conveying to Congress and the public, in a comprehensible fashion, the health of the program and the associated risks.
Since Social Security operates basically on a pay-as-you-go basis, the number of people paying into the system compared with the number of people receiving benefits is a key component of program cost.
Given the enormous uncertainty of long time horizons, Social Security solvency projections based on calculations to infinity should not be continued. However, should be done if and only if the government prioritizes a deeper discussion of the long-term sustainability of the Social Security system's finances.
Social Security's actuaries and Trustees have an enormously difficult task — projecting demographic and economic developments over the next 75 years and conveying to Congress and the public, in a comprehensible fashion, the health of the program and the associated risks.
Since Social Security operates basically on a pay-as-you-go basis, the number of people paying into the system compared with the number of people receiving benefits is a key component of program cost.
- The large increase in fertility rates in the post-war period followed by the sharp reduction and flattening out of fertility rates in subsequent decades to the present explain in large measure the changing fortunes of the OASDI trust funds being experienced now.
- Immigration is a volatile, unpredictable, poorly-understood, and increasingly politically-driven process, and that the long-range projections of immigration are exceptionally challenging.
- The rise in Social Security Disability Insurance claims over the past three decades stems from: rising incidence; population aging; and female catch-up in insurance coverage and incidence.
Given the enormous uncertainty of long time horizons, Social Security solvency projections based on calculations to infinity should not be continued. However, should be done if and only if the government prioritizes a deeper discussion of the long-term sustainability of the Social Security system's finances.
No comments:
Post a Comment