Why is this a mystery? This is just the result of 8 years of Barrrack's religious legacy jihad of ''transformation''. Barrrack believes there can be on other god but his god. The progressive socialist god.
That a university would attack a religious group that advocates for a God of faith and not the god of socialist government? That a university would demand religious groups cast aside their personal religious beliefs in favor of the accepted group-think agenda is some how strange?
The ideology of progressive socialism is 'everyone must be no different or better than anyone else'. To believe outside of the accept parameters of the group is unacceptable. And of course worst of all to believe their is an entity that is larger then themselves other then the group dynamics of socialsit thinking, is outrageously contemptuous and sacrilegious.
G
Individual freedom and the liberty to chose is condemned. And knowing this terrible fact, never vote democrat if liberty is to remain our guiding light for freedom.
That a university would attack a religious group that advocates for a God of faith and not the god of socialist government? That a university would demand religious groups cast aside their personal religious beliefs in favor of the accepted group-think agenda is some how strange?
The ideology of progressive socialism is 'everyone must be no different or better than anyone else'. To believe outside of the accept parameters of the group is unacceptable. And of course worst of all to believe their is an entity that is larger then themselves other then the group dynamics of socialsit thinking, is outrageously contemptuous and sacrilegious.
G
Individual freedom and the liberty to chose is condemned. And knowing this terrible fact, never vote democrat if liberty is to remain our guiding light for freedom.
Christian Student Group Sues University for Rejecting It as Official Club
After expelling several religion-based student groups from campus for “discrimination,” the University of Iowa is being sued for religious discrimination.
The University of Iowa chapter of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA was one of the student clubs kicked off campus for not conforming to a university rule that clubs must eliminate a faith-based precondition to serve in leadership.
InterVarsity Christian Fellowship consulted the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit legal group, and sued the university Monday for violating its First Amendment rights. The lawsuit states that on June 1, the university “abruptly emailed InterVarsity’s student leaders and instructed them that they had until June 15 to change their leadership-selection practices or be deregistered.”
The group responded by “emphasizing the importance of having Christian leadership” for the Christian club, the lawsuit says, but the school rebuffed it. “The university further stated that InterVarsity student leaders could not even be ‘strongly encouraged’ to agree with InterVarsity’s faith,” according to the suit.
The university has disallowed numerous other clubs for the same reason, including Muslim and Sikh groups, it says.
Becket senior counsel Daniel Blomberg said in a formal statement that “banning religious groups from having religious leaders just flattens diversity and impoverishes the campus.”
While the university singled out religious groups for supposed nonadherence with its nondiscrimination policy, Blomberg said, the school “has exempted or ignored leadership and membership restrictions set by other student groups, such as sports clubs, fraternities, and political organizations.”
The university will not comment under its policy on “pending or ongoing litigation,” Anne Bassett, the school’s media relations director, told The Daily Signal on Wednesday.
Kristina Schrock, president of the university’s InterVarsity group, said in a prepared statement:
'We’re grateful to have been part of the university community for 25 years, and we think that the university has been a richer place for having Sikh, Muslim, Mormon, Catholic, Jewish, atheist, and Christian groups. Because we love our school, we hope it reconsiders and lets religious groups continue to authentically reflect their religious roots.'
Ryan T. Anderson, a senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation and co-author of “Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination,” called the case an example of “how our liberties hang—or fall—together.”
“Students should be free to associate around a common cause or mission, including religious ones,” Anderson said. “And they should be free to advocate for that cause and live out that mission, and that requires the ability to select leaders who support the cause and embrace the mission.”
“How sad that in the name of diversity and pluralism the university would seek to curtail the freedoms that protect true diversity and principled pluralism,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment