democrats Blocking Supreme Court Nominee Confirmation : Do It Now! Get It Done!

Being a criminal is no reason to not voting like you are told.

Please, the progressive democrats will always have the ability to ignore criminals when it's in their best interest to do so. 

One of the best is Ted Kennedy, the top democrat guilty of negligent homicide and still a hero. He knew Jo Kepecthne was going to die as he watched her struggle for life in that sinking car. And why would he do this remains the question.

History has shown over and over again, democrats will align shoulder to shoulder when their leadership demands it. Not do so will bring consequences.

democrats understand what it means to be good and loyal members of the collective, as there are consequence for being individuals, that is having independent thoughts on policy.

democrat don't fear that 3 a.m. phone call, they fear that run-away car the runs over one of their children or their wife or being caught up in a drive by shooting. Hey, it could happen to anyone these days and the would-be un-loyal democrat understands this.

And as the democrats are destroying our election system, if they lose any election it's he Russians or Republicans, then why it isn't a stretch to believe the democrats are not ready to compromise the the Supreme Care nominee process as well.

The solution going foreword then is to neve vote for a democratic every again at any level of government. If you do you are knowingly compromising your own integrity.

Bill Clinton Got His Supreme Court Pick While Under Investigation. Trump Should Get His.

Thomas Jipping / August 24, 2018

Back in July, some Senate Democrats started demanding that the confirmation process for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh be delayed until after the Mueller investigation is finished.

None of them, however, explained the connection between the two.

Now, after Michael Cohen’s guilty plea and Paul Manafort’s conviction stemming from the Mueller investigation, they are at it again. They make no more sense today than they did a month ago, especially given that some of those senators have openly opposed Kavanaugh from the get-go.

As I wrote in July, President Bill Clinton was under criminal investigation in 1993 when he nominated Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The Senate voted 96-3 to confirm her nomination just 42 days later.

A year later, Clinton was actually under subpoena when he nominated Justice Stephen Breyer. The Senate voted 87-9 to confirm his nomination and no Democrat feigned concern or suggested delaying the confirmation process.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has said that the American Bar Association’s rating is the “gold standard” for evaluating judicial nominees.

Eighty percent of Trump’s nominees to the U.S. Court of Appeals received a “well qualified” rating from the ABA—a higher percentage than any of the previous five presidents of both parties. Yet most Democrats voted against more than three-quarters of those nominees.

Let’s be honest, these Senate Democrats oppose Trump’s every policy, nomination, decision, thought, word, and deed. So does it surprise anyone that senators who are unalterably opposed to the president and to his judicial nominees would scrounge around for some way to interfere with the Kavanaugh confirmation process?

Schumer said in 2009 that a nominee’s judicial record is the best way to evaluate a nominee. Yet most Senate Democrats refuse to look at the 700 opinions that Kavanaugh wrote or joined over a dozen years on the U.S. Court of Appeals.

So does it surprise anyone that senators who aren’t even pretending to examine this nominee’s record or evaluate his qualifications would grasp at straws to disrupt the confirmation process?

The time between Kavanaugh’s nomination and hearing will be 25 percent longer than the last several Supreme Court nominees. The Judiciary Committee has made public hundreds of thousands of pages of documents relating to Kavanaugh’s executive branch service.

Yet Senate Democrats insist on seeing emails from hundreds of George W. Bush administration staffers, with whom Kavanaugh did not work, about matters for which Kavanaugh was not responsible.

So does it surprise anyone that senators—many of whom announced opposition to Trump’s nominee before they even knew who it was—would make fake “arguments” that serve only to degrade the confirmation process even further?

No, none of this surprises anyone.