Friday, September 11, 2015

EPA Moves Again for More Control : Air Quality Models Wrong

How is it that on agency has the power to do what ever it wants no matter or wrong or illegal it may be? The EPA, using computer models that predicts future results is like the ones the use to predict climate change. They are flawed and have been proven wrong over and over again, and yet here we are being subjected to the same insanity on the cause of Asthma and other lung diseases.

That the facts here are of no consequence, it's simply the EPA knows it has the power to move forward with their ideology of control, no matter what anyone or any organization, even the congress of the United States, can stop them.

What more evidence do we need to once and for all stand up and say enough is enough, and vote out those that give this sinister and corrupt organization it power. The progressive socialist liberal democrats. Failing this will ensure our own demise.

The EPA's Next Big Economic Chokehold
Source:  Tony Cox, "The EPA's Next Big Economic Chokehold," Wall Street Journal, September 1, 2015.

September 9, 2015

Encouraged by advocacy and lobbying groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council and the American Lung Association, it is predicted that this fall, President Obama will set new, lower standards for ground-level ozone production to 60 parts per billion. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) predicts that lower man-made ozone levels will increase quality of life by reducing asthma and other respiratory diseases.
  • However, the National Institutes of Health does not attribute climate change or ozone levels to the cause of asthma.
  • Although ozone levels have fallen nationally since 2000, cases of asthma have increased.
  • The cost of the new regulation, as estimated by the National economic Research Associates, is the loss of millions of jobs and trillions of dollars over the next two decades.
When predicting that lower ozone levels will reduce cases of asthma and other respiratory disease, the EPA used a new and unproven statistical model that is inaccurate. Basing new regulations on this recommendation which impacts almost every sector of the economy would damage, not improve public interests.
 

No comments: