Saturday, August 03, 2019

Gillibrand Yesterday Loved Weinstine And Bill Clinton : Today She Hates Trump!


It all depnds on where you get your information and what you have a tendency to believe is reality! democrats again demonstrating their ability to ignore what has gone on before and how they approved of even the most sinister of individuals but find it so easy to explain how bad you are!

'Sure I have moved on from those days of fun as they don't help me to gain
the power that I need and want! A moral prostitution? I'm just being me'

Trump Exposes Those Behind The Curtain At The Levers of Power!


And this is what the progressive socialist liberal democrats hate the most about Trump, he understands the porblem!

And then the tweet that set it all in motion. Suddenly the curtain blocking
the light is pulled aside.


Baltimore Is A Problem For Progressives : The People Understand Why!


Hey that was then! This is now and it's completely different situations. Noting has changed on the ground of course, the poor and disadvanted are still there,  but the participants in the cover - up are much more important and political.

And when one considers that the 10 largest cities that are infested homeless and rats, are controlled they porgressive socialsist liberal democrats and have been for decades and in some cases  generaitons. 

Clearly, it's the mind set of institutional corruption of the leadership that brings such chaos to civil society. And worse it has been around for so long but nothing has been said or done about it until now that Donald Trump has decided to do something about it!

Little wonder those that are responsible hate him with uncontrolled viciousness. Losing the power for control is unacceptable!


The Rev Sharpton Is Here To Help!


Hey, nothing to see here. It's another edition of the good Reverend bringing balance and justice to a chaotic situation. This is what Sharpton does and does well. 

The history of Mr Sharpton tells a different story though, but never mind that, he is here to bring people together that have a special interest and a lot of lose money. He knows money is what makes things happen.


The color and smell of lose money is powerful!


Friday, August 02, 2019

Secretary Of DHS In Quatemala : Stop The Migration Here He Says!

Reagan was right and neatly always was right like he said ''Trust but verify'' about the nuclear deal with Russia. 

The same must apply here, but we shouldn't wait to verify this deal with Guatemala as the opposition in America and Guatemala is strong. 

We need to build the wall as high and as long is necessary across our southern border to prevent illegals from entering our country at anytime or anyplace other then regulated border crossings, ports of entry.

To do anything less is risking our national security. We will be at risk of losing our identity and sovereignty as a nation of citizens. 

DHS Chief Visits Guatemala to Secure Deal on Migrants
Jason Hopkins / /

Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan visited Guatemala to continue talks with the country’s top leaders after reaching a major agreement on U.S.-bound asylum-seekers.

McAleenan traveled Wednesday to Guatemala City, where he was to speak with officials about the “safe third country deal” recently signed by both countries, according to the Department of Homeland Security. The acting DHS chief, set to return Thursday, also was to engage with local leaders on several other initiatives that aim to reduce the flow of illegal immigration.

“Just arrived in Guatemala,” McAleenan tweeted Wednesday. “Looking forward to working to expand the partnership between Guatemala and the U.S. to stem the flow of illegal migration and disrupt human smuggling and transnational criminal organizations.”

The Trump administration announced Friday that it had reached the safe third country agreement with Guatemala, which requires its government to accept and hold U.S. asylum-seekers from other Central American countries.

For example, illegal immigrants from El Salvador and Honduras who pass Guatemala on their way to the U.S. must instead remain in Guatemala. The plans are expected to be executed during August.

The Trump administration has reached other deals with the Guatemalan government regarding the illegal immigration crisis. The Memorandum of Cooperation signed in May called on Guatemala to better enforce its own borders and stem the flow of migrants that leave its country.

However, until Friday, the tiny Central American country had resisted pressure from President Donald Trump to become a safe third country. Questions remain over whether Guatemala will abide by its side of the agreement—or if it’s even capable of doing so.

Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales’ term ends in January, and it is not yet known who his successor will be. The country will hold an election runoff Aug. 11 between left-wing candidate Sandra Torres and conservative Alejandro Giammattei. Both presidential hopefuls have expressed concern over the accord.

“There needs to be a thorough analysis of whether the minister had the power to sign an agreement with these international characteristics, and in any case the agreement has to go to Congress, whoever signed it,” Torres said of the deal.

Giammattei took to Twitter on the day the agreement was signed to announce his opposition.

McAleenan was expected to meet with both of the leading candidates during his trip and tout the benefits of remaining in the deal. A draft DHS memo obtained by BuzzFeed News indicates that McAleenan was willing to offer both candidates a return of U.S. aid.

For years Washington delivered millions in economic aid to Central American countries, but the Trump administration in June withheld the funds, citing their lack of cooperation on the immigration crisis.

Becoming a safe third country is extremely unpopular among Guatemalans. Citizens took to the streets to protest after Morales’ administration entered into the agreement.

Guatemala’s highest court will decide if the deal must be ratified by Congress, where opposition is strong, and if the interior minister had the legal authority to sign it.

Trump has also pressured Mexico on entering into a safe third country agreement, but Mexico President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has so far bucked his calls.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.




Crushing Debt : It's A Matter of Priorities. Do You Have Any?

Goodness, if all it takes is a little discipline in spending habits, why is it that so many among us find themselves deep in debt? Even those that don't have an income that is anywhere near to sustain unchecked spending and yet they continue to spend.

I think it has something to do with DNA. There has to be a gene that support common sense and logic. If you have it you will be able to do things in your life that sustains a life style of moderation and gratification that is equal to your native intelligence for self preservation.

If you don't have that gene, you will travel through life always on the edge of destruction, having to work way harder to survive then others that can understand what it will take to sustain a life style in moderation without subjecting themselves to the crushing weight of uncontrolled debt.

What it appears to be just a matter of an honest analysis of oneself as to just where they stand in the community of individuals. If you don't have a good education in the STEM disciplines and have a job that supports your educational skills, or you have a native intelligence that will allow you to work at just about any job that requires the ability to learn quickly and easily skills that don't require higher education and of those there are many.  

Then life will take on a new perspective that will bring satisfaction and personal reward of a job well done. In reality, there can not be a better outcome in your life then that! (Oh, other then don't vote democrat that is!)


When Debt Becomes a Life Sentence
Armstrong Williams / /

Debt is quickly becoming a new form of modern slavery in this country. With people becoming increasingly more willing to spend on consumer items and lifestyle enhancements before they actually earn the money, debt is increasingly common.

To be clear, there is both good and bad debt.

Good debt is the use of leverage to invest in a business or acquire new skills that can increase one’s earning capacity well beyond the cost of borrowing. Bad debt is using borrowed money to fund current expenses and lifestyle choices like vacations, clothing, and nights out on the town, and declining assets like cars and home appliances.

Since the Great Recession, many Americans should have been forced to cut back on their lifestyle spending because they were earning less income. But instead of tightening their belts, all too many people have chosen instead to finance lifestyle with debt.

That debt, in the form of credit cards and home equity loans, often comes at an exceedingly high price. Even borrowing for educational purposes has become a victim of lifestyle extravagance.

Student loan debt eclipsed all other forms of debt except for mortgage debt for the first time in 2018. According to Bloomberg, student loans surpassed home equity revolving debt, car loans, and even credit card debt in the aftermath of the Great Recession.

The reasons for this are myriad, but can mostly be attributed to the fact that other traditional forms of debt have become highly regulated, whereas student loan debt, most of it in the form of government subsidized and/or guaranteed loans, has become the new credit card.

As of last year, “Overall consumer debt reached a record $13.5 trillion,” Bloomberg reports, while student loan debt ballooned to a record $1 trillion. This begs the question: Did the students who borrowed over $1 trillion receive educational benefits that enable them to repay that amount?

The data suggests that the answer is no.

According to an article published by CNBC, the average millennial (classified as ages 18 to 34) “had about $36,000 in personal debt, excluding home mortgages, last year.”

Furthermore, more than half of all millennials (classified as ages 18 to 37) “don’t know when, or if, they’ll ever be able to pay off what they owe.” Almost 20% of those expect to die with some form of debt. For them, debt has become a death sentence. But it doesn’t have to be this way. In fact, it should not be this way.

Debt, in one sense, assumes that you know today what you will earn tomorrow and can therefore afford to spend it today. It also assumes that you can afford to save tomorrow in order to pay off the debt you incurred yesterday.

These assumptions about future earnings are almost always wrong. We never really know today if we will be able to pay off debt tomorrow; we don’t know what challenges tomorrow may bring—whether it is some unforeseen medical expense, a death in family, being laid off from a job, or some other catastrophic occurrence. The future is simply unpredictable.

Even good debt—debt incurred to purchase a home, invest in a business, or purchase additional education and earnings—should be questioned.

It appears that during the Great Recession, many Americans tried to ride out the downturn by borrowing to enroll in expensive educational courses—in programs that not only enabled them to purchase the skills, but also paid for their lifestyles, living expenses, clothing, and housing.

That’s why, despite the increase in salaries that millennials earn from advanced education, they are still finding it difficult, and in many cases impossible, to get out of debt.  Compound grossly inflated so-called educational debt with a further refusal to rein in personal spending, and you have a recipe for disaster.

Once they have graduated with their newly minted degrees and gotten jobs, folks still insist on keeping up with the Joneses. With a high-powered consulting firm or law firm job, or with a recent medical degree in hand, they feel entitled to both look and act the part. Thus, they go into further debt or use their income to fund their lifestyle rather than pay down their previous debt. As a result, many end up in a vicious cycle with no relief in sight.

But there is a way out.

Not only is there a way out, but there is also a way forward for those who truly want to live debt-free. It starts with aggressively disciplining one’s spending in the short term. This is not rocket science. You can generally pay down higher interest rate debt, such as student loan debt and credit card debt, by having less lower interest debt, such as mortgage debt.

It requires forgoing consumer purchases, such as a new automobile, vacations, clothing, and expensive electronics, in the short term. It also requires a bit of belt tightening in the short term that in the long term leads to freedom from debt and to prosperity.

Although we all fall down from time to time, that doesn’t mean we have to die and be buried under a mountain of debt. With a little discipline and hard work, we can reap a bountiful harvest of wealth and prosperity.

We can even create a legacy to pass down to our next generation—not only a monetary legacy, but also a legacy of discipline and achievement.

COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Who Is A Racist? :All People In Opposition to Progressive Socialism!

Photo
We demand the power for control! All others must obey
or become a bigot and a racist!
Truly we are at war within our own boarders ands with other people that claim to be Americans. By their actions it seems they are not as they presume singular power to demand other acquiesce, capitulate to their personal agenda and ideology of the absolute power to control.

If you decide your idea of living in America as a citizen isn't about a centralized authority being all things to all people, then you are a bigot and a racist.

Never vote democrat as they understand what it takes to be in total control our your life and that's you allowing it to happen!

Being a Racist Is Easy Today

Years ago, it was hard to be a racist. You had to be fitted for and spend money on a white gown and don a pointy hat. You celebrated racism by getting some burlap, wrapping it around a cross, setting it ablaze, and dancing around it carrying torches.

Sometimes, as did Lester Maddox, you had to buy axe handles for yourself and your supporters to wield to forcibly turn away black customers from your restaurant.

Or, as in the case of Theophilus “Bull” Connor, you had to learn to direct fire hoses and vicious police attack dogs against civil rights demonstrators.

Younger racists, along with their parents, had to memorize poems for whenever a black student showed up for admission to their high school or college. For example, “Two, four, six, eight, we don’t want to integrate!”

Of course, there were a host of racial slurs and epithets that could be hurled, with impunity, at any black person in your presence. In earlier times, you didn’t have to be sophisticated, but it took a bit of work, to be a racist.

Today, all that has changed. To be a racist today takes little effort.

For example, one can sit back in his easy chair and declare that he’s for across-the-board tax cuts. That makes you a racist. If you don’t believe me, think back to 1994 when the Republican-led Congress pushed for a tax cut measure.

Then-Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., denouncing the Republicans’ plan before a Manhattan audience as a form of modern-day racism said: “It’s not ‘spic’ or ‘n——-‘ anymore. [Instead,] they say, ‘Let’s cut taxes.'”

A few months later, Rangel compared the GOP’s “Contract with America” to measures in Nazi Germany saying, “Hitler wasn’t even talking about doing these things.”

Now one can be labeled a racist through a set of “microaggressions” listed in “Diversity in the Classroom, UCLA Diversity & Faculty Development” from 2014.

Here are a few statements one should avoid: “You are a credit to your race.” “Wow! How did you become so good in math?” “There is only one race, the human race.” “I’m not racist. I have several black friends.” “As a woman, I know what you go through as a racial minority.”

But most instances of microaggressions are less overt. There are college microaggressions such as a male student rolling his eyes when a female student speaks, or people not wanting to be in study groups with those of different races.

Perhaps the easiest way to be labeled a racist is to suggest that a wall be built on our border with Mexico in order to keep people from Mexico and points south from entering our nation illegally.

Also, a slam-dunk charge of racism is to say that the standard practice of separating children from parents is Nazi-like.

But imagine you are stopped with your child in the car and charged with a DUI in any of our 50 states. You’re going to be arrested and your child taken to protective child services. The identical practice on our southern border becomes racism.

As veteran journalist Brit Hume said about the uproar over President Donald Trump’s latest bomb-throwing: “Trump’s ‘go back’ comments were nativist, xenophobic, counterfactual, and politically stupid. But they simply do not meet the standard definition of racist, a word so recklessly flung around these days that its actual meaning is being lost.”

The president cleaned up his remarks a few days later saying: “These are people that hate our country. If you’re not happy in the U.S., if you’re complaining all the time, very simply, you can leave.”

By the way, leaving isn’t Trump’s idea. Many leftists pledged to flee America altogether if Trump were elected president.

The bottom line is that when leftists have no other winning argument, they falsely accuse others of racism. Republicans cower at the charge and often give the leftists what they want.

Black Americans who are octogenarians, or nearly so, need to explain what true racism is, not to correct white liberals but to inform young black people.

COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Thursday, August 01, 2019

NAACP Votes To Impeach Trump : It Was Obediently Unanimous!

With this unanimous proclamation from the NAACP to impeach the president means that this organization no longer has standing in the larger civil society, but has become totally biased and irrivlent to that civil society that supposedly represents the needs of back Americans.

Sadly, the NAACP, once proud and a strong advocate for black achievement and advancement in American sociality, but apparently is now just another weak and easily fooled organization believing the rants and ravings of the progressive socialist liberal democrat agenda and ideology of delusion and chaos to gain the power for control.

Know this before you vote in 2020, the progressive democrats have become obedient disciples to the apostasy of the liberal socialist establishment that demands acquiescence to their agenda and ideology where no one is free from control.

It's always about the power for control!

PhotoThe NAACP’s Hateful Call to Impeach the President

At the 110th NAACP annual convention in Detroit, delegates voted unanimously last week to call for the impeachment of President Donald Trump. The NAACP’s official Twitter account announced the news Wednesday, including the hashtag #WhenWeFightWeWin.

NAACP 
#BREAKING: NAACP delegates UNANIMOUSLY pass vote calling for the impeachment of President, Donald J. Trump at the #NAACPConvention.#WhenWeFightWeWin
11:31 AM - Jul 23, 2019

Many NAACP members and liberal lawmakers alike are tenacious about the president’s potential impeachment.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., known for her dislike of the president, might be more passionate than anyone else. Standing on stage at the convention, Tlaib stated that she is going “nowhere, not until I impeach this president.”

Well, Tlaib might be staying right where she is for a long time.

I couldn’t be further from concerned about whether Trump will be impeached. In fact, I wonder how possible it really is. Where is the evidence? What are the NAACP’s reasons behind wanting this? It just doesn’t like him? I hate to say it—well, not really—but it takes a lot more than mere hatred to achieve a goal as large as impeachment.

For more than two years, the left has mounted investigation after investigation to try to find evidence to impeach the president. Removing the president from office has been the agenda of the far left since Nov. 8, 2016—the day of the election.

Last week we saw the final hammer dropped on their dreams of impeachment during the two bizarre House hearings for former special counsel Robert Mueller.

The hearings, on the same day the NAACP announced its stand on impeachment, confirmed that after spending nearly two years and tens of millions to produce impeachable offenses by the president, no impeachable offenses exist.

The fourth and final expense report is due soon. The first three reports totaled approximately $6.8 million, $10 million, and $8.5 million, respectively. So the last one, if comparable to the others, would make the final dollar amount of Mueller’s probe between $32 million and $35 million.

The two Mueller hearings Wednesday proved a few things:

—Mueller was confused as to both the law and the facts. He did not know, for example, that the special counsel’s mandate did not authorize him to exonerate or not exonerate the president.

—Mueller filibustered by continuously asking that questions be repeated.

—It did not appear that he had written the report, and his legal analysis in many cases was simply flawed.

Because Democrats are unable to impeach Trump on serious, legitimate charges of collusion with Russians or obstruction of justice, they have taken up the banner of hate. They actually want to impeach the president because, they claim, he is a hateful racist. We now have officially entered into the land of the absurd.

Unfortunately for the 11% of Republicans and 64% of Democrats who want to impeach our president, the Mueller investigation did not yield anything new.

It is clear to see that this notion of impeachment, so passionately taken on by the NAACP, is fueled purely by hatred and nothing else. The cries for impeachment without any facts do the nation and the historic civil rights organization a disservice.

Calling racist every tweet from the president may keep the discussion relevant for a while, but it never will be grounds for impeachment.

With no evidence, something seemingly gallant and beneficial for America just turns into a waste of time and money.

A YouGov survey states that 45% of Americans oppose the president’s impeachment, which is more than the 36% that support it. Why don’t we just listen to America?

In the future, the NAACP should try to fight for something it might actually win, such as advocating policies to help black Americans, that is its mission, instead of rushing into a war doomed for failure—and blindly telling its followers, “It’s all going to be OK.”


Civil Right Panel Believes Barrrack Is Right : No Discipline For Minorities Students!

Photo
Here is a picture of what it means to have socialsit 
democrats in control of schools and civil society! 
Only chaos and conflict can and does result!
Nothing to see here, all is well. What you see is not reality. Reality is what we say it is.

To believe that the Civil Rights Panel has the best interesting at heart for civil society is to use the Hillary phrase for explaining the incomprehensible, ''We must have a willingness to suspend disbelief''.

Does it mean that the Civil Rights Panel members want to do us all harm?

Civil Rights Panel Wants to Bring Back Obama’s Race-Based School Discipline Policies. Bad Idea.
Jonathan Butcher / /

Washington late last year reversed a policy that was micromanaging the way teachers and principals kept order in classrooms. Now, a federal commission wants to limit local educators’ control again.

Teachers should be feeling whiplash.

In December, the U.S. Department of Education and the Justice Department rescinded federal directives that said Washington would investigate schools based on the number of times teachers and principals suspended or expelled minority students—even if the offending students had committed violence. A school could have lost federal funding as a result.

The rules came from a 2014 Obama administration letter sent to districts around the country instructing educators to limit such punishments, even if a student was a danger to his or her peers.
This 2014 letter mirrored the ideas from Broward County, Florida, where the school district limited suspensions and expulsions—and created a bureaucratic mess.

The accused February 2018 shooter at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School slipped through the school district’s discipline program. In middle school, educators referred the accused shooter to Broward County’s program, a set of interventions designed to “reduce student arrests.” But the district admitted last May that administrators have no record of what, if anything, was completed.

Following the tragic deaths of 17 students, faculty, and staff and the wounding of 17 others at the Parkland, Florida, school, Broward school officials have faced scrutiny for their handling of the shooting. Then-Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel and several deputies were fired in connection with the disaster.

Over the years, as other district administrators followed federal guidance and limited student discipline, teachers reported feeling less safe in school and increased levels of harmful student behavior, as reported by the Manhattan Institute.

Studies from Florida and Philadelphia have found that leaving disruptive students in the classroom is related to negative academic outcomes for the peers of the offending students.

But in 2018, after the Broward County tragedy, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos led the Federal Commission on School Safety, which conducted hearings around the country seeking input from educators. The commission released a report containing best practices from local schools on safety, mental health, and student discipline.

The final report also called for the rescission of the 2014 “Dear Colleague” letter, and the departments of Education and Justice followed the recommendation.

The Federal Commission on School Safety explained its recommendation in the final report:  The [2014 Obama administration] Guidance sent the unfortunate message that the federal government, rather than teachers and local administrators, best handles school discipline.

As a result, fearful of potential investigations, some school districts may have driven their discipline policies and practices more by numbers than by teacher input.

In a report released Tuesday, however, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights announced it had voted in favor of federal monitoring of school suspensions and expulsions, and criticized the use of exclusionary discipline.

The commission praised the 2014 guidance, saying the “Dear Colleague” letter “provided schools with important information about what the law is and how to address school discipline problems in a nondiscriminatory way.”

The Civil Rights Commission claims the guidance was just “detailed information about what the law is,” but the 2014 “Dear Colleague” letter sounded like Washington was looking for reasons to investigate.

The letter said schools should use “exclusionary discipline as a last resort” and contained an appendix with specific methods of data collection related to student discipline, restorative justice practices, and collaboration with law enforcement.

The commission’s recommendations would take a school’s focus off of school safety and student success in exchange for counting how many students of a particular race are disciplined, even if the students did something to warrant suspension.

The civil rights panel’s recommendations also suggest that federal agents should be more involved in local decision-making, taking authority away from parents, teachers, and school principals.

Parents and teachers know that all children are different and that situations involving punishment must be handled differently, specific to the circumstances.

In her dissent from the Civil Rights Commission’s recommendations, commission member Gail Heriot said that in schools with majority-minority student enrollment, “if teachers fail to keep order in those classrooms out of fear that they will be accused of racism, it is these minority students who will suffer the most.”

No children should be disciplined just because of the color of their skin. But the commission’s deference to the Obama administration’s heavy-handed letter favors bureaucrats over you and your child’s teachers.

DeVos and federal officials made the right decision last December in rescinding the Obama-era guidance. Parents and teachers, not federal bureaucrats, should make decisions about student safety.

The Mueller Report Grows More Intense? : democrats Demand The Truth Is There!


Still, the beat goes on! No matter the circumstances that are shown to be false, the progressive liberal socialist democrats continue to berate Donald Trump for something he didn't do.

But it's the narrative. It's not about the facts, it's ''the seriousness of the charge'' that matters to persuade people to the progressive's far left agenda that are not paying attention to what is  going on around them.

For the progressive socialsit liberal democrat, you are 'guilty until proven innocent' and with the agenda and ideology of the democrats, Republican and Conservatives will never be proven innocent. It's the agenda, the narrative and the ideology of the of the few to command the many.

It readily becomes clear that the leftist liberal democrats are never right in their personal attacks on people that they don't like, but they are never in doubt about their cause.

Another short sentence that explains the agenda of the sanctimonious and falsely righteous is, ''by the foulest means,the progressive democrats believe they are sanctified by their perceived nobility of their cause.'' All others must become obedient to their power or be eliminated from the debate.