I wonder if anyone is really surprised that Mr Ogbjma would actually try and go around congress to accomplish his religious jihad for transformation of the most powerful country in the world into a third world back-water nation that will have to wait on a Untied Nations directive to defend itself, all the while other nations like Iran pushes forward with it's nuclear programs.
And it's also not lost on anyone that once Mr Ogbjma leaves office he will seek to be Secretary General of the United Nations where he will begin his final push for his 'new world order' where all nations must obey a central authority.
It isn't lost on the rest of the world that without the Untied States as the leader in nuclear weapons, everyone else will be subjected to intimidation from those that have functional nuclear weapons programs. The result will be all other nations that find themselves in the crosshairs of belligerent states like Iran, China, North Korea, Russia and others, will decide they must have nuclear weapons as well to defend themselves.
I believe this is just one phase of Mr Ogbjma's strategic religious transformation plan, like he is doing at home with his religious jihad to divide the country by fostering class, ethnic and gender warfare, Mr Ogbjma is pitting all nations against one another that will ultimately end the chaos of world war.
What better way to gain control of world population then to bring chaos and destruction to all humanity. How much easier then for those that seek peace to understand that obedience and compliance to one and only one authority is their only option.
Obama Seeks to Circumvent Congressional Opposition by Advancing Nuclear Agenda at UN
Brett Schaefer / Michaela Dodge / @MichaelaTHF /
President Barack Obama has supported a ban on nuclear testing since his earliest days in office, but has been unable to rally support for ratification of a nuclear test ban treaty in the U.S. Senate.
Frustrated with this opposition and facing the end of his second term, The Washington Post reports, Obama will bypass Congress and seek a United Nations Security Council resolution that “would call for an end to nuclear testing” on the 20th anniversary of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. This is an extremely troubling decision that ignores fundamental concerns about such a ban and is dangerously erosive of the separation of powers outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
The Senate voted to reject ratification of the nuclear test ban treaty on Oct. 13, 1999. It did so for sound reasons. For example, the treaty does not define what constitutes a nuclear weapons test. Russia, and possibly China, conduct hydronuclear experiments that allow them to explore new weapons designs and train a more proficient workforce in the national nuclear laboratories.
Even worse, the treaty is not verifiable because one can conduct nuclear tests and experiments in very small spaces or can decouple weapons tests so they wouldn’t be detected. The treaty would not bring about a change of their behavior, nor make proliferation less likely. After all, the number of nuclear weapons states has increased since the U.S. stopped nuclear weapons tests. The test ban treaty remains problematic today. American nuclear weapons are aging and the U.S. has not conducted a test since 1992. As designs depart from the tested envelope, the uncertainty with respect to expected performance of nuclear warheads will increase.
The United States must preserve an option for conducting yield-producing experiments to make sure its nuclear warheads are safe, secure, reliable, and effective. Such is the cornerstone of strategic deterrence and assurance of U.S. allies.
Going to the U.N. Security Council and ignoring these fundamental concerns is a deliberate affront to the separation of powers detailed in the Constitution, particularly Article II, which states that the president shall make treaties only with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate. It continues a pattern, also used on the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris climate agreement, of circumventing Congress to advance the president’s priorities that lack congressional support. Worse, the resolution is unlikely to have any effect on the nuclear proliferating countries that the U.S. is concerned about. Countries like North Korea, for instance, have continued to test in the face of existing Security Council resolutions and sanctions.
German intelligence has also warned that Iran “is still making extensive attempts to acquire materials to further its nuclear program,” despite the nuclear deal negotiated by the Obama administration.
“What it really does is allow countries like Russia and China to be able to bind the United States over our nuclear deterrent capability without the scrutiny of Congress,” said Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn. “Should we ever decide we may wish to test, we could be sued in international courts over violating a United Nations Security Council resolution that Congress played no role in.”
And it's also not lost on anyone that once Mr Ogbjma leaves office he will seek to be Secretary General of the United Nations where he will begin his final push for his 'new world order' where all nations must obey a central authority.
It isn't lost on the rest of the world that without the Untied States as the leader in nuclear weapons, everyone else will be subjected to intimidation from those that have functional nuclear weapons programs. The result will be all other nations that find themselves in the crosshairs of belligerent states like Iran, China, North Korea, Russia and others, will decide they must have nuclear weapons as well to defend themselves.
I believe this is just one phase of Mr Ogbjma's strategic religious transformation plan, like he is doing at home with his religious jihad to divide the country by fostering class, ethnic and gender warfare, Mr Ogbjma is pitting all nations against one another that will ultimately end the chaos of world war.
What better way to gain control of world population then to bring chaos and destruction to all humanity. How much easier then for those that seek peace to understand that obedience and compliance to one and only one authority is their only option.
Obama Seeks to Circumvent Congressional Opposition by Advancing Nuclear Agenda at UN
Brett Schaefer / Michaela Dodge / @MichaelaTHF /
President Barack Obama has supported a ban on nuclear testing since his earliest days in office, but has been unable to rally support for ratification of a nuclear test ban treaty in the U.S. Senate.
Frustrated with this opposition and facing the end of his second term, The Washington Post reports, Obama will bypass Congress and seek a United Nations Security Council resolution that “would call for an end to nuclear testing” on the 20th anniversary of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. This is an extremely troubling decision that ignores fundamental concerns about such a ban and is dangerously erosive of the separation of powers outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
The Senate voted to reject ratification of the nuclear test ban treaty on Oct. 13, 1999. It did so for sound reasons. For example, the treaty does not define what constitutes a nuclear weapons test. Russia, and possibly China, conduct hydronuclear experiments that allow them to explore new weapons designs and train a more proficient workforce in the national nuclear laboratories.
The United States must preserve an option for conducting yield-producing experiments to make sure its nuclear warheads are safe, secure, reliable, and effective. Such is the cornerstone of strategic deterrence and assurance of U.S. allies.
Going to the U.N. Security Council and ignoring these fundamental concerns is a deliberate affront to the separation of powers detailed in the Constitution, particularly Article II, which states that the president shall make treaties only with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate. It continues a pattern, also used on the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris climate agreement, of circumventing Congress to advance the president’s priorities that lack congressional support. Worse, the resolution is unlikely to have any effect on the nuclear proliferating countries that the U.S. is concerned about. Countries like North Korea, for instance, have continued to test in the face of existing Security Council resolutions and sanctions.
German intelligence has also warned that Iran “is still making extensive attempts to acquire materials to further its nuclear program,” despite the nuclear deal negotiated by the Obama administration.
“What it really does is allow countries like Russia and China to be able to bind the United States over our nuclear deterrent capability without the scrutiny of Congress,” said Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn. “Should we ever decide we may wish to test, we could be sued in international courts over violating a United Nations Security Council resolution that Congress played no role in.”
No comments:
Post a Comment