Acosta Uses Chaos and Conflict As A Tool : Progressive Socialist Ideology For Power

The war goes on! And what is so unnerving for the porgressive socialsit liberal democrats is that they are beginning to see they are losing ground. Acosta is only the front man who when this battle is over will be kicked to the curb like all of the others that have been used and abused to attack America's civil society and her Constitution that guarantees the individual freedom to chose.

The bright spot is Donald Trump is continuing to push back against the mob of haters and spoilers in our free society.

The question that remains is why so many among us are unaware of the danger imposed by progressive socialists like Acosta and the main stream media, the porgressive socialist movement who demand the power for control?

Could it be that the people who vote for progressive socialism believe they are not qualified to rule themselves? Who exactly are these people and how did they arrive at this belief?

Acosta drives the narrative of chaos and conflict to 

gain back power for control.

As CNN’s Acosta Returns, White House Seeks ‘Decorum’ for Press

Fred Lucas / @FredLucasWH / November 16, 2018

CNN reporter Jim Acosta is back in the White House, and the Trump administration is working on rules for “decorum” during press conferences.

“People have to behave. We’re writing up rules and regulations,” President Donald Trump told reporters Friday afternoon, when asked about the court ruling. He said other reporters were treated unfairly, “because you had somebody interrupting you. With the rules and regulations, we will end up back in court and we will win.”

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, of the District of Columbia, granted CNN a temporary restraining to halt the Trump administration from blocking Acosta’s access to the White House, and ordered his press pass to be returned.

Asked what he meant about rules, Trump said, “decorum.” “You can’t take three questions and four questions. You can’t stand up and not sit down,” Trump said. “We want total freedom of the press. It’s more important to me than anybody would believe. But you have to act with respect when you’re at the White House, and when I see the way some of my people get treated at news conferences, it’s terrible. So we’re setting up a certain standard, which is what the court is requesting.”

The judge, who was appointed by Trump, cited the 1977 D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in the case of Sherrill v. H. Knight, which determined a press pass can’t be revoked for arbitrary or “less than compelling reasons.” Kelly noted that the White House did not provide a reason about safety or security in denying the pass.

In a packed courtroom Friday, the judge determined that Acosta, as CNN’s chief White House correspondent, faced “irreparable harm” from being unable to access the building.

Kelly stressed the “very limited nature of today’s ruling,” adding that he has “not determined a First Amendment interest” as of yet, which is part of the CNN litigation. Rather, he was only addressing CNN’s Fifth Amendment argument on due process.

He further said he was not addressing the plaintiff’s argument about viewpoint discrimination, but was only ruling that the White House should immediately reinstate Acosta’s credentials, and they should remain reinstated for the duration of the litigation. Both sides will be back in court next week. The judge ruled on a motion from CNN to restore the pass that allows Acosta to enter the White House for the duration of the lawsuit.

In a public statement, CNN stressed it is looking at the next step in the litigation.  “We are gratified with this result and we look forward to a full resolution in the coming days,” the CNN statement said. “Our sincere thanks to all who have supported not just CNN, but a free, strong and independent American press.”

Statement from CNN and @Acosta on today’s ruling: “We are gratified with this result and we look forward to a full resolution in the coming days. Our sincere thanks to all who have supported not just CNN, but a free, strong and independent American press. 48.4K  9:40 AM - Nov 16, 2018

Meanwhile, the White House seized on the judge refraining from ruling yet on the First Amendment argument.

“Today, the court made clear that there is no absolute First Amendment right to access the White House,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. “In response to the court, we will temporarily reinstate the reporter’s hard pass. We will also further develop rules and processes to ensure fair and orderly press conferences in the future. There must be decorum at the White House.”

The long feud between CNN and the Trump exploded after a testy exchange during a presidential press conference the day after the midterm election. After addressing a question, Trump refused to answer more Acosta questions and tried to move onto another reporter, but Acosta initially refused to give up the microphone to a White House intern who tried to take it.

The White House revoked the hard pass and didn’t specify if the move was temporary or permanent. Sanders said the White House revoked the pass because it could “never tolerate a reporter placing his hands on a young women just trying to do her job as a White House intern.”

The Media Research Center, a conservative media watchdog group, was dismissive of the claim of a First Amendment right to a White House pass early on.

“This isn’t a major victory, just as withdrawing the pass wasn’t a major loss,” Tim Graham, director of media analysis at the Media Research Center, told The Daily Signal. “CNN during this whole time hasn’t been truly impaired, since there they have a stable of White House reporters and producers. They’re rearranging the deck chairs on a big fat yacht of liberal bias.”