The question that should be addressed is how did it come to be that the mental hospitals were phased out? What was the reasoning then and what is the reasoning now for not opening them back up?
It stands to reason that this shouldn't be rocket science. People that commit violence, extreme violence, mass killings cannot be considered just depressed, low or confused, they are by definition mentally ill. Nobody commits extreme acts of violence against other human beings and not be mentally ill.
Now I'm not a doctor or play on TV, but at the same time I'm not a rocket scientist either or even dream of being one, still it's just common sense that neglecting treatment for mental illness as a priority, 'the mentally ill are not violent', is committing oneself to a guarantee of more extreme violence to our civil society.
It stands to reason that this shouldn't be rocket science. People that commit violence, extreme violence, mass killings cannot be considered just depressed, low or confused, they are by definition mentally ill. Nobody commits extreme acts of violence against other human beings and not be mentally ill.
Now I'm not a doctor or play on TV, but at the same time I'm not a rocket scientist either or even dream of being one, still it's just common sense that neglecting treatment for mental illness as a priority, 'the mentally ill are not violent', is committing oneself to a guarantee of more extreme violence to our civil society.
Our Approach to Severe Mental Illness Endangers Everyone
Jarrett Stepman
/
@JarrettStepman
/
Americans pour billions of their taxpayer dollars into treating mental illness, but the spending isn’t addressing the real crisis. Though most media coverage focuses on gun control after shootings take place, few reports pay attention to the increasing problem of untreated, severe mental illness.
As The Daily Signal previously reported, a massive deinstitutionalization of mentally ill people occurred in the past half-century.
How Better Treatment of the Mentally Ill Could Reduce Mass Shootings
In an article in National Review, the Treatment Advocacy Center’s executive director, John Snook, writes about how dramatic the move to deinstitutionalization has been:
''From its historic peak in 1955 to 2016, the number of state psychiatric-hospital beds in the United States plummeted almost 97 percent, in a trend known as ‘deinstitutionalization.’ There are now fewer beds per capita in the United States than there were in 1850. An analysis of the broader system of both inpatient and other 24-hour residential-treatment beds similarly found a 77.4 percent decrease from 1970 to 2014.
This change is having serious repercussions for the country.
A recent Heritage Foundation panel addressed this problem, outlining the depth of the crisis and how it is putting the mentally ill and the rest of society at increased risk.
Watch the video : https://youtu.be/F0Jdzi_bdCk
Dr. Sally Satel, a psychiatrist and resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute who is an expert in mental health policy, explained how, as a nation, we have muddled what it means to be mentally ill. A wide gap exists between general problems with mental health—such as depression and anxiety—and severe mental illness, Satel said.
Those with severe mental illness “can’t really function and participate in life,” she said. Worse, they increasingly are incarcerated instead of being treated. “An estimated 1 in 5 people in homeless shelters and approximately 20 percent of those in jail or prison were classified as having a severe mental illness,” Satel said.
These are individuals with conditions such as schizophrenia, crippling post-traumatic stress disorder that prevents them from leaving home, and other debilitating illnesses. “Severely mentally ill people are the ones who are populating our jails, unfortunately because our system clearly has problems; the infrastructure of the mental health system is bad in many places,” Satel said.
This is the most vulnerable population that is not getting proper treatment, in part because we have misallocated resources to treat conditions that are a lot less serious. “Severe mental illness and mental health are different things,” Satel said.
DJ Jaffe, executive director of Mental Illness Policy Org, a nonprofit organization devoted to informing the public about serious mental illness, said our misguided policies are hurting people with mental illness and putting everyone at risk. Jaffe said we are failing to make a distinction between a generally bad mental state and severe mental illness, which is about more than just being sad or depressed.
He brought up the case of President Ronald Reagan’s attempted assassin, who had delusions that shooting the president could land him a date with a Hollywood actress. “John Hinckley shot President Reagan because he knew for a fact that that was the best way to get a date with Jodie Foster,” Jaffe said. “That is serious mental illness, and we are failing people with it.”
Dealing with the issue is not just about spending more money. “In spite of the federal government spending $147 billion annually, states kicking in around another $50 billion annually, 400,000 seriously mentally ill are incarcerated, 140,000 mentally ill are homeless. Why is this?” Jaffe asked.
“The reason is we moved from a hospital-based system, which by definition served people with mental illness, to a community-based system that largely ignores those with serious mental illness,” he said.
The problem, Jaffe said, is that the system stopped focusing on the seriously mentally ill. Currently, 35 percent of them receive no treatment at all, he said. The solution, he said, is to shift priorities instead of just spending more money: Decrease mental health spending and start spending to address severe mental illness. “Replace mission creep with mission control,” Jaffe said.
The mental health industry has fueled this problem, he said, by misleading the government and the American people. “After every headline-grabbing act of violence like a Parkland or a Virginia Tech, the industry tries to convince government to not take steps to reduce violence by the mentally ill,” Jaffe said. “They pull out their favorite claim: ‘The mentally ill are no more violent than others.’”
This is nonsense, Jaffe said, and is based on cherry-picking the data in the studies. He said the actions of the health care industry prove its belief that the severely mentally ill are more dangerous:
''The studies show treatment works, no more, no less. And the industry knows the mentally ill are more violent than others. Psychiatric units are locked, cancer units aren’t. Psychiatric nurses wear panic buttons, those in heart units don’t. Outreach teams go out in pairs for their own safety.
The mental health industry is soliciting contracts to train police how to deescalate in situations involving the mentally ill, not people with psoriasis. So of course the untreated mentally ill are more violent than others, and the industry has led us to ignore that.
Instead of treating these potentially dangerous individuals, the mental health industry focuses on addressing “stigma,” Jaffe said. But this isn’t the problem. Our policies will have a healthy change when we start listing to the police, who have become the real experts on what is going on, Jaffe said.
People who should have been committed to institutions before they got dangerous are filling our prisons. Police are forced to deal with these people, many of whom have become “frequent flyers” who continually have run-ins with authorities.
“What closing psychiatric hospital beds did was it moved people from hospitals to jails. There are 10 times as many incarcerated as hospitalized now,” Jaffe said.
Americans pour billions of their taxpayer dollars into treating mental illness, but the spending isn’t addressing the real crisis. Though most media coverage focuses on gun control after shootings take place, few reports pay attention to the increasing problem of untreated, severe mental illness.
As The Daily Signal previously reported, a massive deinstitutionalization of mentally ill people occurred in the past half-century.
How Better Treatment of the Mentally Ill Could Reduce Mass Shootings
In an article in National Review, the Treatment Advocacy Center’s executive director, John Snook, writes about how dramatic the move to deinstitutionalization has been:
''From its historic peak in 1955 to 2016, the number of state psychiatric-hospital beds in the United States plummeted almost 97 percent, in a trend known as ‘deinstitutionalization.’ There are now fewer beds per capita in the United States than there were in 1850. An analysis of the broader system of both inpatient and other 24-hour residential-treatment beds similarly found a 77.4 percent decrease from 1970 to 2014.
This change is having serious repercussions for the country.
A recent Heritage Foundation panel addressed this problem, outlining the depth of the crisis and how it is putting the mentally ill and the rest of society at increased risk.
Watch the video : https://youtu.be/F0Jdzi_bdCk
Dr. Sally Satel, a psychiatrist and resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute who is an expert in mental health policy, explained how, as a nation, we have muddled what it means to be mentally ill. A wide gap exists between general problems with mental health—such as depression and anxiety—and severe mental illness, Satel said.
Those with severe mental illness “can’t really function and participate in life,” she said. Worse, they increasingly are incarcerated instead of being treated. “An estimated 1 in 5 people in homeless shelters and approximately 20 percent of those in jail or prison were classified as having a severe mental illness,” Satel said.
These are individuals with conditions such as schizophrenia, crippling post-traumatic stress disorder that prevents them from leaving home, and other debilitating illnesses. “Severely mentally ill people are the ones who are populating our jails, unfortunately because our system clearly has problems; the infrastructure of the mental health system is bad in many places,” Satel said.
This is the most vulnerable population that is not getting proper treatment, in part because we have misallocated resources to treat conditions that are a lot less serious. “Severe mental illness and mental health are different things,” Satel said.
DJ Jaffe, executive director of Mental Illness Policy Org, a nonprofit organization devoted to informing the public about serious mental illness, said our misguided policies are hurting people with mental illness and putting everyone at risk. Jaffe said we are failing to make a distinction between a generally bad mental state and severe mental illness, which is about more than just being sad or depressed.
He brought up the case of President Ronald Reagan’s attempted assassin, who had delusions that shooting the president could land him a date with a Hollywood actress. “John Hinckley shot President Reagan because he knew for a fact that that was the best way to get a date with Jodie Foster,” Jaffe said. “That is serious mental illness, and we are failing people with it.”
Dealing with the issue is not just about spending more money. “In spite of the federal government spending $147 billion annually, states kicking in around another $50 billion annually, 400,000 seriously mentally ill are incarcerated, 140,000 mentally ill are homeless. Why is this?” Jaffe asked.
“The reason is we moved from a hospital-based system, which by definition served people with mental illness, to a community-based system that largely ignores those with serious mental illness,” he said.
The problem, Jaffe said, is that the system stopped focusing on the seriously mentally ill. Currently, 35 percent of them receive no treatment at all, he said. The solution, he said, is to shift priorities instead of just spending more money: Decrease mental health spending and start spending to address severe mental illness. “Replace mission creep with mission control,” Jaffe said.
The mental health industry has fueled this problem, he said, by misleading the government and the American people. “After every headline-grabbing act of violence like a Parkland or a Virginia Tech, the industry tries to convince government to not take steps to reduce violence by the mentally ill,” Jaffe said. “They pull out their favorite claim: ‘The mentally ill are no more violent than others.’”
This is nonsense, Jaffe said, and is based on cherry-picking the data in the studies. He said the actions of the health care industry prove its belief that the severely mentally ill are more dangerous:
''The studies show treatment works, no more, no less. And the industry knows the mentally ill are more violent than others. Psychiatric units are locked, cancer units aren’t. Psychiatric nurses wear panic buttons, those in heart units don’t. Outreach teams go out in pairs for their own safety.
The mental health industry is soliciting contracts to train police how to deescalate in situations involving the mentally ill, not people with psoriasis. So of course the untreated mentally ill are more violent than others, and the industry has led us to ignore that.
Instead of treating these potentially dangerous individuals, the mental health industry focuses on addressing “stigma,” Jaffe said. But this isn’t the problem. Our policies will have a healthy change when we start listing to the police, who have become the real experts on what is going on, Jaffe said.
People who should have been committed to institutions before they got dangerous are filling our prisons. Police are forced to deal with these people, many of whom have become “frequent flyers” who continually have run-ins with authorities.
“What closing psychiatric hospital beds did was it moved people from hospitals to jails. There are 10 times as many incarcerated as hospitalized now,” Jaffe said.
No comments:
Post a Comment