Along with all of the other changes in our complicated lives in modern civil society, the new politics of dynamic leadership, we now are faced with having to decide what to do about our very existence on a personal level.
Given our belief in the preservation of life and consequences of suicide in biblical terms, how does one determine the worth of life without first understanding what it means by ending life as a conscience decision?
That this assisted suicide phenomena has spread this far and this fast in our supposedly enlightened society is disturbing and incredibly deceptive as to just how complicated the consequences are for the spirit of the patient and for the conscience of the relatives.
Assisted Suicide Dehumanizes Suffering, Opponents Argue
Rachel del Guidice / @LRacheldG /
Allowing physicians to help people kill themselves is a misguided “game-changer” in how society responds to suffering, a doctor who specializes in children’s medicine said during a Heritage Foundation event on assisted suicide. “Physician-assisted suicide redefines the concept of a medical good as never before,” Dr. G. Kevin Donovan, professor of pediatrics and director of clinical bioethics at Georgetown University, told the audience for the panel discussion.
“For the first time, we will plan to end suffering by ending the life of the sufferer,” Donovan said.
The event Monday, which featured Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., a sponsor of legislation on the topic, focused on the societal dangers of physician-assisted suicide.
Ryan T. Anderson, a senior research fellow at Heritage, called the widespread legalization of the practice “a grave mistake.” So far, five states plus the District of Columbia have legalized physician-assisted suicide. But, Anderson noted, 16 other states have introduced bills to allow it.
“Physician-assisted suicide comes with serious costs,” he said. “Too many people view it as purely a private matter between an autonomous adult who desires to die and another autonomous adult who can provide medical assistance to die.” Anderson was host of the event along with Kathryn Jean Lopez, a senior fellow at National Review Institute.
This Lawmaker Faults GOP Leadership for Not Blocking DC Assisted Suicide Law
Lankford said the issue is personal for him because someone in his own family could be targeted by proponents of assisted suicide. Their standard for proceeding, he noted, is a diagnosis that someone has six months or less to live. “I have a very dear family member … given a diagnosis of six months to live in 1981, and she is still kicking and is still a pretty amazing lady,” Lankford said.
So the standard is presumptuous, the Oklahoma Republican said:
Watch the video - https://youtu.be/9fzs1AZssVA
Also on the panel was Melissa Ortiz, the founder of Able Americans, an organization that seeks to give a voice to those with chronic illness and physical and mental disabilities. Ortiz said her own neurological disability helped convince her that society must reframe the discussion:
“I cannot tell you the number of times that people have addressed [my husband] to ask what I would like,” she said. “And before that they would ask my mother or my friends, because I couldn’t possibly answer for myself because I am in a wheelchair.” Ortiz said her family also was faced with a situation with a loved one where caring action made all the difference. Her father-in-law battled prostate cancer, which spread to the bone, and did not have “great doctors,” she said:
Physician-assisted suicide became legal in California on June 9, 2016. “We do not know how many people have taken advantage of assisted suicide because we are not allowed to know how many people have taken advantage,” Domingo said. “There is no tracking system that is open to any kind of public scrutiny at all.”Physician-assisted also includes a significant amount of unknowns, Domingo said. “What happens if you change your mind? What happens if you change your mind and then become incompetent and someone else in the house still thinks it is a good idea? These are very real situations that real families in California are right now facing,” she said.
Supporters of physician-assisted suicide, including Compassion & Choices, an organization advocating its legalization across the nation, argue that terminally ill individuals should have the choice to “end their suffering if it becomes intolerable.” Donovan said choosing death by opting for assisted suicide may be the least expensive path to take, but is dangerous for patients and physicians.
“In medicine we know that what is permissible becomes habitual, and what is habitual becomes standard care, and what is [the] standard of care becomes obligatory,” Donovan said. “We will be changing the standards of care for all physicians and all patients by changing this law for society and the profession.”
Given our belief in the preservation of life and consequences of suicide in biblical terms, how does one determine the worth of life without first understanding what it means by ending life as a conscience decision?
That this assisted suicide phenomena has spread this far and this fast in our supposedly enlightened society is disturbing and incredibly deceptive as to just how complicated the consequences are for the spirit of the patient and for the conscience of the relatives.
Something this strategic in our lives can be what seems so easy to legislate to solve such a complicated problem as life ending begs a lotto mentality. Just buy a ticket and hope you will be a winner. Actually having to make life be a success on your own terms is missing these days.
Is everyone looking for the free ride?
Assisted Suicide Dehumanizes Suffering, Opponents Argue
Rachel del Guidice / @LRacheldG /
Allowing physicians to help people kill themselves is a misguided “game-changer” in how society responds to suffering, a doctor who specializes in children’s medicine said during a Heritage Foundation event on assisted suicide. “Physician-assisted suicide redefines the concept of a medical good as never before,” Dr. G. Kevin Donovan, professor of pediatrics and director of clinical bioethics at Georgetown University, told the audience for the panel discussion.
“For the first time, we will plan to end suffering by ending the life of the sufferer,” Donovan said.
The event Monday, which featured Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., a sponsor of legislation on the topic, focused on the societal dangers of physician-assisted suicide.
Ryan T. Anderson, a senior research fellow at Heritage, called the widespread legalization of the practice “a grave mistake.” So far, five states plus the District of Columbia have legalized physician-assisted suicide. But, Anderson noted, 16 other states have introduced bills to allow it.
“Physician-assisted suicide comes with serious costs,” he said. “Too many people view it as purely a private matter between an autonomous adult who desires to die and another autonomous adult who can provide medical assistance to die.” Anderson was host of the event along with Kathryn Jean Lopez, a senior fellow at National Review Institute.
This Lawmaker Faults GOP Leadership for Not Blocking DC Assisted Suicide Law
Lankford said the issue is personal for him because someone in his own family could be targeted by proponents of assisted suicide. Their standard for proceeding, he noted, is a diagnosis that someone has six months or less to live. “I have a very dear family member … given a diagnosis of six months to live in 1981, and she is still kicking and is still a pretty amazing lady,” Lankford said.
So the standard is presumptuous, the Oklahoma Republican said:
This belief that somehow medicine can look over the shoulders of someone and tell someone exactly how long they [will] live begs the reality of just everyday care for individuals and … quite frankly, for those of us who are followers of God, just the belief in what God can choose to do in the life of an individual and the dignity of that person.Before the District’s physician-assisted suicide law went into effect Feb. 18, Lankford introduced a resolution attempting to halt its implementation. Donovan also said it is impossible for his fellow doctors to be completely accurate in judging the lifespans of patients because it is not something they have been trained to do. “There are at least a couple of things that doctors do not do well,” Donovan said. “And the first one is prognosticate the end of someone’s life because actually, we do not have much training in that and we do not have much data. Every patient is an individual.”
Watch the video - https://youtu.be/9fzs1AZssVA
Also on the panel was Melissa Ortiz, the founder of Able Americans, an organization that seeks to give a voice to those with chronic illness and physical and mental disabilities. Ortiz said her own neurological disability helped convince her that society must reframe the discussion:
We have got to change the conversation from talking about ‘the elderly’ and ‘the disabled’ to talking about people who are elderly and people with disabilities. When you take away that little ‘the’ … they become individuals with stories. Putting the ‘the’ in front of it makes them objects and objectifies them; dare I say, it makes them subhuman.Ortiz said she has experienced the reality of the “disabled” label.
“I cannot tell you the number of times that people have addressed [my husband] to ask what I would like,” she said. “And before that they would ask my mother or my friends, because I couldn’t possibly answer for myself because I am in a wheelchair.” Ortiz said her family also was faced with a situation with a loved one where caring action made all the difference. Her father-in-law battled prostate cancer, which spread to the bone, and did not have “great doctors,” she said:
I fired all the doctors and got him much better care … and he was with us for … 12 years after that. He would have missed knowing his only grandchild, and his only grandchild would have missed knowing him.Suffering and illness, Ortiz said, can be a way to “walk in victory”:
Suffering, internal illness is not always about us as individuals, the person doing the suffering. It is about the people around us and learning to walk out that suffering, not looking for a way to get out, but looking for a way to walk in victory.Kathleen Buckley Domingo, also on the panel and associate director for the Archdiocese of Los Angeles Life Ministry, said she is alarmed at how physician-assisted suicide has been handled in her state.
Physician-assisted suicide became legal in California on June 9, 2016. “We do not know how many people have taken advantage of assisted suicide because we are not allowed to know how many people have taken advantage,” Domingo said. “There is no tracking system that is open to any kind of public scrutiny at all.”Physician-assisted also includes a significant amount of unknowns, Domingo said. “What happens if you change your mind? What happens if you change your mind and then become incompetent and someone else in the house still thinks it is a good idea? These are very real situations that real families in California are right now facing,” she said.
Supporters of physician-assisted suicide, including Compassion & Choices, an organization advocating its legalization across the nation, argue that terminally ill individuals should have the choice to “end their suffering if it becomes intolerable.” Donovan said choosing death by opting for assisted suicide may be the least expensive path to take, but is dangerous for patients and physicians.
“In medicine we know that what is permissible becomes habitual, and what is habitual becomes standard care, and what is [the] standard of care becomes obligatory,” Donovan said. “We will be changing the standards of care for all physicians and all patients by changing this law for society and the profession.”
No comments:
Post a Comment